(Obviously a question of "national security"...)
Experts question decision not to name ISIS terrorists killed in Afghanistan drone strike
August 28, 2021 4:39pm Updated
Major Gen. William Taylor did not name the ISIS terrorists who were killed in the US drone strike in Afghanistan on Aug. 27, 2021.
Susan Walsh/AP
The failure of the Biden administration to name the two Islamic State terrorists killed in a US drone strike in Afghanistan on Friday has led some experts to conclude they were not high-value targets.
In a press conference Saturday, Major Gen. William Taylor only referred to the dead targets as a “planner” and “facilitator,” and would not say if they played specific roles in the airport suicide attack Thursday that killed 13 American soldiers and 169 Afghans. Islamic State Khorasan, or ISIS-K, was behind the attack.
“Normally if they get a high-profile guy they like to name him,” retired US Army Lt. Col Brian F. Sullivan told The Post.
“They keep talking BS about ‘eyes over the horizon’ but I think a lot of this is the administration blowing more smoke,” Sullivan added. “They’re throwing this up as if the US is reacting with strength and power. So that makes the score something like ISIS 200-US two. Who are they kidding?”
Experts question decision not to name ISIS terrorist killed in Afghan strike
They can name the six kids they killed earlier today in another drone attack.
Or today's missile attack:
Rockets target U.S. troops as Afghanistan withdrawal enters final stage
Reuters
Rockets target U.S. troops as Afghanistan withdrawal enters final stage | Reuters
So you keep asserting, but you and others, have yet to provide any evidence of the clause "rules" allegedly ignored.
What is, a preliminary Reuters report, with no evidence as to who the perpetrators were, where the missiles came from, who ....
Currently, you have a
U.S. completes withdrawal from Afghanistan - Axios
The last U.S. military planes have taken off from Kabul's airport, marking the end of the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and of the efforts to airlift thousands of U.S. citizens and vulnerable Afghans as the country fell to the Taliban, CENTCOM Commander Gen. Kenneth McKenzie confirmed on Monday evening.
The state of play: The U.S. facilitated the evacuation of over 120,000 people, including 5,000 Americans, but up to 250 Americans and thousands of Afghan allies were still attempting to leave the country. The airport had come under attack in the final days of the operation, potentially spurring the Pentagon to complete its withdrawal ahead of President Biden's Aug. 31 deadline.
McKenzie said the Kabul airlift was the largest civilian evacuation mission executed by the U.S. military. He said the "vast majority" of Americans who hoped to flee were evacuated.
He said the last flight left at 3:29 pm ET on Monday. The evacuation of U.S. civilians ended about 12 hours earlier, he said.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
...folks decide for themselves what is in their own best interest...few like having their own best interest decided by others...
...yep...the US fifth column (evangelicals, QAnon folks, redneck militias, incels and far-right media) got its revenge on US life in general when tRump was elected...they tasted power and liked the feeling...
Last edited by tomcat; 31-08-2021 at 09:51 AM.
Majestically enthroned amid the vulgar herd
This is the fuck up of all fuck ups, no doubt.
Whom ever was the brains behind this evacuation, you should be taken to Afghanistan and live out your days with one of the passport holding families left behind.
I take it that Biden would have been given advice from his Armed Forces etc. What were they thinking?
I think that the Brits and Aussies asked for a bit more time, but Uncle Sam said no? Is this correct?
Pretty much - the French and Brits want to set up a cordon around the airport - why not, the Brits can get their arses kicked there a second time and a first for the French.
What they don't seem to understand is that they are operating on foreign soil. Sovereign foreign soil. Then Taliban decide who is and isn't allowed and for how long . . . as much as that irks people.
It's an untenable situation, wherever the cordon is drawn the Talibs can simply widen theirs and not let anyone through - even easier for them to see who worked for the foreigners as they simply search one after the other.
The people are fucked.
The Brits went to war in Afghanistan three times in the past, if you do not include this recent debacle. They got their asses kicked all three times.
Anglo-Afghan Wars | History, Significance, & Facts | Britannica
I think this was partly domestic politics in the UK, Boris wanted to show the voters that he was a caring soul. He knew very well that the August 31st date was a contracted obligation with the Taliban (thanks again Bsnub for the confirmation) and that Biden would keep to the agreement. Boris could just go back to the faithful and tell them that he had tried his best. I do not think for even one moment that he expected Biden to break the deal with the Taliban.
Now, having kept his end of the deal, Biden can at least ask the Taliban for assistance in repatriating foreign nationals who want to leave. It could happen. Time will tell.
Secretary Blinken's remarks on our efforts in Afghanistan since August 14 and the way forward
Excellent - to what was he referring? Do you have a link? Do you understand that many missions have been accomplished even since yesterday? Mluvit Anglicky? (forgive me if my tense for 'speak' is incorrect, I'm
worried that <please no names here> might not like it.
And maybe you haven't seen it this time or are just making shit up again - or wilfully taking it out of context
Last edited by panama hat; 31-08-2021 at 11:26 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)