Thread: Mueller's Russian Interference investigation

Exactly.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

I know exactly what Mueler's got; a big fat nothing burger.

And some fat and happy worthless lawyers.

The only reason for the investigation was the precious inconsolable Hilarybots could not accept that Hilary Clinton was an absolute shit candidate who was destined to lose.
What a fucking clown show!

I think it might have had more to do with the 17 intelligence agencies that all stated categorically that Russia interfered with the election.

You know, rather more than your obsession with old Hillary.

It's actually kinda funny that some ranting and demented loon who drinks his own piss thinks that he has the inside info and scoop on Mueller's investigation.

Because piss-drinking, ranting and demented, loons are ranked approx. #123,987,234,563,128th on the list of reliable sources.

^always parading your ignorance...

Oh, Earl's gone and proven me wrong.

With a cut 'n paste of a meme.

*Splutter*

We noted then that the 17 separate agencies did not independently declare Russia the perpetrator behind the hacks; however, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence speaks on behalf of the group.

<snip>

Aftergood said it’s fair to say the Director of National Intelligence speaks for the intelligence community, but that doesn’t always mean there is unamity across the community, and it’s possible that some organizations disagree.
But in the case of the Russia investigation, there is no evidence of disagreement among members of the intelligence community.

17 intelligence organizations or 4? Either way, Russia conclusion still valid | PolitiFact

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/u...a-fbi-nsa.html

I wonder how Manafort, Gates and Papadopoulos are enjoying their "nothing burgers".

Posting three nothing burgers in succession... that defo adds up to a something burger.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Posting three nothing burgers in succession... that defo adds up to a something burger.

I can't hear anything!
I can't hear anything!
I can't hear anything!

Was Trump colluding with the Russians?

I don't think so.

Where is the evidence he worked with them?

Originally Posted by Grampa

Was Trump colluding with the Russians?

I don't think so.

Where is the evidence he worked with them?

There isn't any.

Complete MSM fiction, it is the end of MSM and the DNC, and very good riddance.

Fox News thanks you for being their demographic and your dutiful service.

Originally Posted by Grampa

Was Trump colluding with the Russians?

I don't think so.

Where is the evidence he worked with them?

The investigation is not just of him, but his campaign and his staff. And it is no longer just focused on the issue of collusion.

As I said earlier, that specifically is an easy issue for him to dip out of by denying it and throwing yet another employee under the bus.

Have you still not grasped the basic concept that the investigation is allowed to go wherever it leads?

I think baldy orange cunto's communications with the Russians are going to be far more interesting than just whether or not he knew they were going to start up a load of twatter and facetube bots.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

wherever it leads

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Fox News thanks you for being their demographic and your dutiful service.

I despise FOX and do not watch them. FOX is awful.

I've stated this before on the board for years.

So after a year and millions spent 'nothing'.

But it has had the desired effect for it forced him to put sanctions in place against Russia for fear of being called a Russian stooge.

Or is it that he didnt previously understand and was brought up to speed after he was elected just how much the US needs enemies to support its arms industry and by extension the economy.

Remember how back in 2011 Obama was told to keep paying the defense industry or the economy dies.

https://www.wired.com/2011/10/defens...-cuts-economy/

Originally Posted by birding

So after a year and millions spent 'nothing'.

Really, tell that to Manafort, Flynn et. al. Pretty sure they won't agree.

And why does everyone keep imposing their own idiosyncratic and subjective time-frame on it and judging it on that. Bill Clinton's and Nixons' respective investigations went on for years.

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Four charges so far, two have plead guilty....

I would dare say when the president is the target, you want to be sure you have a "kill shot" as an attorney. That's going to take time. Mueller is smart enough to dot the i's and cross the T's.

He's also smart enough to realise that there is no impeachment with a GOP majority.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

He's also smart enough to realise that there is no impeachment with a GOP majority.

Unless the evidence is overwhelming clear that he either:

1. Colluded with the Russians to get elected. In this case it's the royal "he" as the person in charge of his staff.
2. Obstructed justice by obstructing the investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Russians.

I agree, but the obstruction of justice is going to be an easy case to put forth, the problem is that it has to be done with criminal intent and even trump probably can't prove what his intent was...

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Unless the evidence is overwhelming clear that he either:

1. Colluded with the Russians to get elected. In this case it's the royal "he" as the person in charge of his staff.
2. Obstructed justice by obstructing the investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Russians.

I agree, but the obstruction of justice is going to be an easy case to put forth, the problem is that it has to be done with criminal intent and even trump probably can't prove what his intent was...

there is now overwhelming evidence that there is nothing.

This makes a very good case for the dissolution of the FBI/DOJ and all associated federal punks.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

there is now overwhelming evidence that there is nothing.

Where?