Thread: Green Party files for a recount of presidential votes in Wisconsin

Once again PJW nails it. Snubbsies, it's not about UFOs. Just a heads-up!

The party's presidential nominee Jill Stein is also expected to demand a recount of the votes in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Wisconsin to recount presidential votes | TheHill

Originally Posted by david44

Green Party files for a recount of presidential votes in Wisconsin The party's presidential nominee Jill Stein is also expected to demand a recount of the votes in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

I had heard in a private german TV network that in those 3 states there was a very strong difference between counties with paper ballots, going to Clinton. And counties with computer voting going to Trump.

now some statisticians claim there is no possibility of fraud,

one word: sore loser !!!

Originally Posted by Takeovers

Originally Posted by david44

Green Party files for a recount of presidential votes in Wisconsin The party's presidential nominee Jill Stein is also expected to demand a recount of the votes in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

I had heard in a private german TV network that in those 3 states there was a very strong difference between counties with paper ballots, going to Clinton. And counties with computer voting going to Trump.

Wow....you "heard".....

Let's see proof.

Originally Posted by Cold Pizza

Let's see proof.

Just wait for the reasons given for the recount request.

Originally Posted by Takeovers

Originally Posted by Cold Pizza

Let's see proof.

Just wait for the reasons given for the recount request.

I don't think you need one as long as it is within a certain margin, although I can't remember what that margin is.

slither

Clinton campaign: We are taking part in the recount - CNNPolitics.com

Big question, will this make any difference to the end result if it goes the other way?

PJW is a moron, an ad hominem spewing loud mouth personified. An orderly recount is not a threat to anything.

Paul Joseph Watson Is A Completely Hypocritical Idiot

What do you call someone who uses every epithet in the book, who fear mongers, employs out-dated information and ad hominem attacks, enjoys a lack of thought-provoking originality, and is a major hypocritical mouth piece for one of biggest bloviators to ever speak into a microphone? Paul Joseph Watson.

Trump: The whole thing is rigged!

Others: Ok we'll audit it.

Trump: NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

The nasty little shit stains cannot accept that nasty old Shillary got shafted straight up the shitter.

Fuk me Eh, fookin laughed like fook when The Donald kicked her fat arse.

Nothin worse than a bad loser and all the retards who call for a recount are just that.

Suck it up shitters.

4 years aint that long Eh.

If Hillary accepts doing a recount then trumps promise not to investigate her is off too!

^^

That's fair enough and I accept your opinion not to vote.

On the other hand the retards who did not vote and are now bangin the drum for Fat arse are quite pathetic and should be shot for talking out of school.

^^

If all these shit stains actually want a recount then why leave it this far down the road ?

If it was that close that a recount could be considered valid than it should of been done in the first week.

Originally Posted by terry57

this far down the road ?

Less than 3 weeks after the vote, and almost two months ahead of January 20, is too far down the road?

Originally Posted by pulvarien

If Hillary accepts doing a recount then trumps promise not to investigate her is off too!

He says this as everyone is eviscerating Castro for jailing political dissidents. Including Trump himself.

The idiot really has no self awareness, does he?

Butt-hurt losers demand recount

and thats only Luigi's poll he been stuffed into my resurected poll.....

Before the election Stein was saying Clunkton was more dangerous than Trump, now she just wants recounts in the states Trump won. What about NH?

She is either being paid by Clunkton or this is a money-making scam by her, cashing in on the hysterics who are clinging to any kind of chance of stopping Trump. Perhaps both.

The dims are trying every trick in the book to derail an orderly transition, and delegitimize the elections that were held.

Originally Posted by UrbanMan

Less than 3 weeks after the vote, and almost two months ahead of January 20, is too far down the road?

Urban Man...Remember that thread you started about the election(which I can't find now) and I gave you a heads up that there was already a similar thread in progress?? I think it was the day before election day as I left to go on the road the day of the election.

What did I post there about my suspicion that the vote count would be rigged to put Trump in and then he could be the next Herbert Hoover and fall guy when the economic shit storm hits....Remember that??

Sure enough in just 3-5 key states the vote tally swung enough to tip the electoral college vote in his favor. Imagine that...

Now we'll see about the rest of it.

Personally I was hoping Hillary would be the fall guy.

No, really?

Paper Ballot Op-Scan Systems in FL, WI, NY, OH Confirmed to Overheat, Mistally 70% of Votes
[2012]

excerpt(full story at link):

New paper ballot optical-scan computer tabulator systems used to tally millions of votes in New York --- as well as "swing states" such as Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin --- do not tally votes correctly. That stunning admission comes courtesy of a new report released by the private company which manufactures, sells, services and programs the systems which are now believed to have mistallied tens of thousands of ballots in New York in 2010.

The votes of more than ten million voters could be affected by a newly revealed failure in the voting systems set for use in those four states in this year's Presidential election, and in more than 50 different jurisdictions in Wisconsin during next month's historic recall elections.

Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), the largest e-voting machine company in the U.S. and the maker of the paper ballot op-scan tally systems in question, have confirmed that their systems may overheat when used over several hours (for example, during an election!), and that they then may mistally and/or incorrectly discard anywhere from 30% to 70% of votes scanned by the machines.

"overheating"

Originally Posted by SKkin

Urban Man...Remember that thread you started about the election(which I can't find now) and I gave you a heads up that there was already a similar thread in progress?? I think it was the day before election day as I left to go on the road the day of the election.

What did I post there about my suspicion that the vote count would be rigged to put Trump in and then he could be the next Herbert Hoover and fall guy when the economic shit storm hits....Remember that??

Sure enough in just 3-5 key states the vote tally swung enough to tip the electoral college vote in his favor. Imagine that...

Now we'll see about the rest of it.

Personally I was hoping Hillary would be the fall guy.

I actually DO remember that. People with $billion+ can greatly influence things, so its not as far fetched as some would like to naively think. I see people near me with just a couple $million, and they have no shortage of lackeys willing to do their bidding, in the hopes of some money/favors coming their way. And that's just a couple million.

I still think more than anything Hillary effed it up. I posted somewhere on TD, a couple days after the election, the theory that Hillary did not during the campaign speak to rural white women + working class white women. Totally ignored them. They ended up being a key part of the Trump support. She was not going to win them, but she ended up being completely slaughtered by them in most if not all of the key states ... with a little effort, it could have been less than a slaughter, and we'd all be giggling now about The Donald failing.

I agree an economic bomb of some sort is coming. Near zero interest rates causing bubbles in several key areas. At some point, all bubbles burst, or at least significantly deflate, for a couple years.

Cycles repeat. Oil is a perfect example. Experts all over saying, the world needs so much energy, oil has to be expensive. No brainer. Can't lose. Not exactly, as it turns out.