Thread: Green Party files for a recount of presidential votes in Wisconsin

Originally Posted by SKkin

No matter which you supported in the past US election, the veracity of electronic voting and even more so the counting of such votes is a very real concern. Has been since the advent of the touch screen voting machines.

The year 2000 was the last time I voted. Specifically because that was the year touch screen machines came to my precinct. I voted and then asked for a paper receipt showing how my ballot was cast. The election worker told me "oh these machines can't do that." I said to myself "well I won't be back" and I haven't been.

Yeah the establishment is going to tell you these systems are fail safe and fraud proof. Anyone who still believes them about anything is the sucker.


BlackBoxVoting.org

very good point,

and one developer of the Siebold machine was on records saying they were rigged, back in 2003

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by longway

The dims are trying every trick in the book to derail an orderly transition, and delegitimize the elections that were held.

You either have a very vivid imagination or you are extremely stupid. I put my money on the latter.

The 'dims', as you refer to us, have no interest in this recount process other than as observers. Your desire to drum up a story here just shows how desperate you are to keep things polarized.

Of course if one state flips as a result of obvious voting fraud, then the whole election is called into question.

My wouldn't that just be fun!

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

and one developer of the Siebold machine was on records saying they were rigged, back in 2003

It's "Diebold", the same clowns that make all those ATMs. Oh, and they mostly run on Win XP so it's hardly surprising they are ridiculously easy to knock over...

nothing to do with the OS dummy,

the hacking is programmed in, you can choose the winner before the vote is cast according to that developer

Aren't they all! Damn, PJW just keeps nailing it!

No UFOs here!

She's a snowflake, but she's no idiot. Wiki-
In 1973, Stein graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College, where she studied psychology, sociology, and anthropology. She then attended Harvard Medical School and graduated in 1979

She's a vaxxer, so of course she's an idiot; all vaxxers are.

mods, please delete this thread. this poster is obviously obsessed and is starting multiple threads on the same subject to vent his madness on this subject.

Thank you

Originally Posted by slackula

vaxxer

Ok, what is a "vaxxer" ?? Seriously, because that's a new one to me...

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by longway

The dims are trying every trick in the book to derail an orderly transition, and delegitimize the elections that were held.

You either have a very vivid imagination or you are extremely stupid. I put my money on the latter.

The 'dims', as you refer to us, have no interest in this recount process other than as observers. Your desire to drum up a story here just shows how desperate you are to keep things polarized.

Yeah if by observer you mean drooling retards hoping for a miracle. Of course they are going to put a gloss on it, the fact they haven't disowned such a spectacle shows how desperate clunkton is, she must have sacrificed 2-3 kids already, hoping to sway the Prince of darkness to intervene in her favour.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by longway

The dims are trying every trick in the book to derail an orderly transition, and delegitimize the elections that were held.

You either have a very vivid imagination or you are extremely stupid. I put my money on the latter.

The 'dims', as you refer to us, have no interest in this recount process other than as observers. Your desire to drum up a story here just shows how desperate you are to keep things polarized.

I am a drooling regard.

Originally Posted by slackula

A person who is opposed to vaccination, typically a parent who does not wish to vaccinate their child. 'experts say several diseases that are avoidable are making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their kids

ahhh...ok thanks for the answer. In regard to that, I think the old school vaxx like I got when I was a kid were fine. All the new ones around are another way for big pharma to shear the sheep. And imo some of the new ones have questionable health benefits and ingredients as well. Especially some of those that infants are 'required' to get.

Originally Posted by longway

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by longway

The dims are trying every trick in the book to derail an orderly transition, and delegitimize the elections that were held.

You either have a very vivid imagination or you are extremely stupid. I put my money on the latter.

The 'dims', as you refer to us, have no interest in this recount process other than as observers. Your desire to drum up a story here just shows how desperate you are to keep things polarized.

I am a drooling regard.

You know if you want to try and edit other peoples' posts, you should learn how to spell, you fucking RETARD.

Seems this recount bidness is a very tetchy subject. Now the Green Party(or at least one of them) is supposedly throwing Jill Stein under the bus. Don't want nothing to do with her recount effort.

Greens Speak Out on Recount and Our Commitment to an Independent Party - Flowers for Senate

There are significant electoral reforms needed to make elections more democratic and more representative of the people. While we support electoral reforms, including how the vote is counted, we do not support the current recount being undertaken by Jill Stein.

The decision to pursue a recount was not made in a democratic or a strategic way, nor did it respect the established decision making processes and structures of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS). The recount has created confusion about the relationship between the Green and Democratic parties because the states chosen for the recount are only states in which Hillary Clinton lost. There were close races in other states such as New Hampshire and Minnesota where Clinton won, but which were not part of the recount. And this recount does not address the disenfranchisement of voters; it recounts votes that were already counted rather than restoring the suffrage of voters who were prevented from voting.

As a candidate, Dr. Stein has the right to call for a recount. However, we urge the GPUS to distance itself from any appearance of support for either Democrats or Republicans. We are well aware of the undemocratic actions taken during the primaries by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Greens cannot be perceived to be allied with such a party.

A bit like the condemned demanding to see the blank round in the firing squad.
We have compulsory voting so at least we don't end up with someone who won 50% of 50%. Still doesn't stop us getting a load of self serving unrepresentative retards and a disproportionate amount of ex lawyers.
Maybe the kiwis can enlighten us on their voting system and if it works any better across the dutch.

Originally Posted by longway

Yeah if by observer you mean drooling retards hoping for a miracle. Of course they are going to put a gloss on it, the fact they haven't disowned such a spectacle shows how desperate clunkton is, she must have sacrificed 2-3 kids already, hoping to sway the Prince of darkness to intervene in her favour.

You don't really function very well without having a real focus for your poison. Clinton is happily taking walks and playing with her grandchild. She is not going to be president. She is not going to win a re-count. Nobody actually believes that she will. Yet you keep dragging her corpse out for anal sex. Get a life or focus on the real problem - Donald Trump. He has become a laughing stock with his 3am tweets whining and complaining about millions of illegal votes for Clinton.

Less than 3 weeks after the vote, and almost two months ahead of January 20, is too far down the road?

No - the important date is December 19th. That's when the electoral college votes have to be in. So, funnily enough, Donald Trump still isn't confirmed as President. Theoretically, he could still be rejected as unsuitable. This is very unlikely to happen.

Originally Posted by JayZee

This is very unlikely to happen.

Totally unlikely, just like a state flipping after one of these re-counts.

Talking about it all is just a diversion because Trump supporters don't want the subject to be about his berserk acccusations and lies on Twitter.

The last I heard on the Wisconsin recount is trumps vote is up bye 126.

News is now out on Michigan and 2 huge detroit counties that Hillary won overwhelmingly in wayne and another seem to have huge vote discrepancies. There seem to of been 30% more votes counted and sent in then actually voted in those counties. And this means trumps majority in Michigan would actually be much larger. And this corruption for the dems is probably what trump was referring to.

Lessig: 20 Trump electors could flip - POLITICO

Larry Lessig, a Harvard University constitutional law professor who made a brief run for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, claimed Tuesday that 20 Republican members of the Electoral College are considering voting against Donald Trump, a figure that would put anti-Trump activists more than halfway toward stalling Trump’s election.

Lessig’s anti-Trump group, “Electors Trust,” has been offering pro bono legal counsel to Republican presidential electors considering ditching Trump and has been acting as a clearinghouse for electors to privately communicate their intentions.

more at the link...