Thread: President Donald Trump

^^Hey, even Charles Krauthammer of Fox News had to comment on the "weird" press conference held by Sean Spicer over "ratings."

This is about Trump's people putting a spin on something which can be verified.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

I must say this snowflake obsession with the Trump crowd size is highly amusing.

Clearly you are living in a false reality. It was not an issue until Drumpf started started spouting off about it yesterday at CIA headquarters. It was a clear blow to his ego that he had a very low turnout for the inauguration that was quickly eclipsed by the massive global protest the next day.

Stick to your bubble and false reality.

Originally Posted by misskit

Hey, even Charles Krauthammer of Fox News had to comment on the "weird" press conference held by Sean Spicer over "ratings."

Spicer was clearly forced by his master to go out and flat out lie. This is a modern day dystopia unfolding before our eyes.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/donald...minutes-233984

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by buriramboy

I must say this snowflake obsession with the Trump crowd size is highly amusing.

You've got it backwards moron. Trump is the one who has made it an obsession.

How many times and you and fellow snowflake commented on or linked articles to the crowd size? But you're not obsessed.........

I think you'll find the issue isn't the crowd size but both the orange-faced twat and his press secretary desperately lying about it.

If he wasn't such a sensitive little flower, it would have been forgotten about by now.

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by Humbert

To see this man's insecurities so pathetically on display is an unfolding tragedy.

it's amusing, but it's a technique that can work

apparently he is following the school of attack of Cohn, his lawyer and mentor, and infamous McCarthy second man

Yes, Donald is so insecure and incompetent that he decided to run for the Oval office despite having absolutely no chance of ever getting there....

Then he beat out about twenty competitors with far more political experience and somehow stumbled though and won the nomination.....despite every effort to sabotage his efforts....

Then he managed to take on the iron-clad Hillary who was a 100% sure thing; lost all three TV debates; suffered through months of mocking and ridicule in the media and here on Teakdoor; which is universally viewed as the last word on all things political...

Then he went and won the fuking election...

Trump style insecurity and incompetence does seems to have a winning way about it..

And don't forget, Clinton outspent Trump to the tune of $380,000,000.

How Much Did Trump Spend On His Campaign To Beat Hillary Clinton? Total Money Raised By 2016 Election Candidates

Originally Posted by bsnub

Clearly you are living in a false reality

A fact free reality. He's a dimwitted brit who shoots his mouth off without being informed.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

And don't forget, Clinton outspent Trump to the tune of $380,000,000.

Yes, I did overlook that item, ....but you know it's not nearly as important as crowd size, or Trump being a bad dancer..... And in any case what's $380 million to a Washington insider, when it's crowd size that matters....

[QUOTE="Humbert"]Their endless bleating about him overcoming impossible odds /QUOTE]

Speaking of endless bleating......it's not hard to see where most of that is coming from in this thread....and it sure as hell isn't Trump backers.

Originally Posted by koman

when it's crowd size that matters....

Trump would do well to pick up some of your attitude about this. He's the butthurt little snowflake making it an issue isn't he?

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by koman

Then he beat out about twenty competitors with far more political experience and somehow stumbled though and won the nomination.....despite every effort to sabotage his efforts....

Winning is one thing. Actually being president is quite another. He can't keep gloating about his huge win for long. Its beginning to wear a bit thin. His supporters should keep that in mind too. Their endless bleating about him overcoming impossible odds cannot explain away his every boorish gaffe forever.

I am quite convinced he wasn't expecting to win, or wanted to win for the sport of it, but not being bothered with running the whole thing

his VP might be the real POTUS, like it was for Dick Cheney

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by buriramboy

I must say this snowflake obsession with the Trump crowd size is highly amusing.

You've got it backwards moron. Trump is the one who has made it an obsession.

How many times and you and fellow snowflake commented on or linked articles to the crowd size? But you're not obsessed.........

I think you'll find the issue isn't the crowd size but both the orange-faced twat and his press secretary desperately lying about it.

If he wasn't such a sensitive little flower, it would have been forgotten about by now.

The issue is every little insignificant unimportant thing Trump mentions sends the snowflakes wild when they could just choose to ignore it. Who seriously cares if the crowds were smaller than Trump imagined them to be.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Trump is a Democrat at heart, always been.

no, he's always been a trump at heart. his only affiliation is to himself and his brand.

being liberal on the social issues that are convenient for his lifestyle doesn't in itself make him a democrat.

Originally Posted by misskit

^^Hey, even Charles Krauthammer of Fox News had to comment on the "weird" press conference held by Sean Spicer over "ratings."

This is about Trump's people putting a spin on something which can be verified.

Again, so what!

Perhaps it is a deliberate ploy to get the liberal press wound up over nothing.

No let us go back to some serious issues: like the small hands,

and the ultimate Trump disgrace to the office of President..the Donald can't dance like Fred Astaire.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

And don't forget, Clinton outspent Trump to the tune of $380,000,000. How Much Did Trump Spend On His Campaign To Beat Hillary Clinton? Total Money Raised By 2016 Election Candidates

that's 100 USD per extra voter over Trump

what an investment

pussy grabbing comment = 0 USD

election result = priceless !!!

And don't forget, Clinton outspent Trump to the tune of $380,000,000.

Perhaps there should be an investigation into where all that money came from and what the donors expected to get in return had she been elected, only fair for they are going to investigate Trump for being allegedly financed by Russian-American pensioners.

let's not forget how the government of France, UK, Australia etc... interfered with the US election by publicly endorsing Hillary and financing her campaign with public donations from their respective countries

surely, something is wrong here and conflict of interests in rampant

Denying feud over Russia hacking, Trump vows support to CIA

Denying feud over Russia hacking, Trump vows support to CIA

Yea right just as they supported him. Who will be the first to put their resignation on the desk.

Former CIA Chief Says Military Could Defy Donald Trump?s Orders - Washington Wire - WSJ

Originally Posted by birding

Perhaps there should be an investigation into where all that money came from and what the donors expected to get in return had she been elected

You uninformed dimwit. Individual donations are capped at $2,700. PACs can receive larger amounts up to $5000 but the campaign organizations are completely insulated from them regarding their spending.
Are you seriously suggesting that everyone who contributed $2,700 should be investigated for expecting a favor?

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Who seriously cares if the crowds were smaller than Trump imagined them to be.

Well obviously he does, doesn't he?!

He not only sent his Press Secretary to spin it, but decided to rant about it himself.

FFS you are dim.

Originally Posted by Humbert

He is a thin skinned, insecure buffoon who isn't fit for the office he now holds.

My oh my, but not a word about it from the Donald on twitter!

Ya reckon he just doesn't fucking care!

How insensitive to let the media get all wound up without even a single little tweet!

I suspect Trump is privately laughing his fucking ass off!

And doing childish doodles of Bart Simpson at his desk in the Oval Office.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

I suspect Trump is privately laughing his fucking ass off!

Right Earl, negative press doesn't bother him at all.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

And doing childish doodles of Bart Simpson at his desk in the Oval Office.

While the others make the decisions.

Now that's plausible.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by birding

Perhaps there should be an investigation into where all that money came from and what the donors expected to get in return had she been elected

You uninformed dimwit. Individual donations are capped at $2,700. PACs can receive larger amounts up to $5000 but the campaign organizations are completely insulated from them regarding their spending.
Are you seriously suggesting that everyone who contributed $2,700 should be investigated for expecting a favor?

You stupid one eyed prick try doing a little research before your next idiotic post.

Hillary Clinton's Top Donors - pg.1

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/18/...-coordination/

Top donars to her campaign were Hiam and Cheryl Saban with a donation of at least 10 million

Originally Posted by birding

You stupid one eyed prick try doing a little research before your next idiotic post. Hillary Clinton's Top Donors - pg.1 https://theintercept.com/2016/10/18/...-coordination/

That money is from Super PACs imbecile. The candidates and the campaigns have no contact with PACs or Super PACs It does not go directly into the campaign chest. It is used for advertising that the candidate has no control over.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about.