Thread: President Donald Trump

Originally Posted by Humbert

No laws have been broken. A

Maybe , maybe not. The guy who wrote the piece probably was smart enoigh not to implicate himself.

My point is it's not a good situation for insiders to take it upon themselves to judge the pres unstable and try running things themselves then bragging about it like they're some kind of hero.

Originally Posted by uncle junior

it's not a good situation

...it's just another entertaining wrinkle in an already terrible situation...I imagine there's much worse to come, ethical or not...

Originally Posted by uncle junior

Originally Posted by Humbert
No laws have been broken. A
Maybe , maybe not.

A dangerous state of affairs when writing an OP which is regarded as disloyal to POTUS can be construed as a criminal act but shouting for a political opponent to be jailed is not.

Originally Posted by uncle junior

Maybe , maybe not. The guy who wrote the piece probably was smart enoigh not to implicate himself.

My point is it's not a good situation for insiders to take it upon themselves to judge the pres unstable and try running things themselves then bragging about it like they're some kind of hero.

the mole is a replican, of course he is going to be 2 faced and disloyal and betray all democratic principles

let Trump be Trump,

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

disloyal and betray all democratic principles

Such as?

Originally Posted by Humbert

A dangerous state of affairs when writing an OP which is regarded as disloyal to POTUS can be construed as a criminal act

if the guy broke any laws it would be in regards to the 'resistance' he claims to be a part of and what they've done......he can write any OP he wants...1st amendment sez so.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Such as?

such as overiding the president orders of the day, for that alone the mole is a "sabotageur" and a "traitor" despite the good he is trying to do,

I would be interested if that was the case too under Obama, and I suspect now it was also the case

Obama order the Pentagon to do something, some small time fuckwit there over ride his orders and do the opposite and nobody notices it

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I would be interested if that was the case too under Obama, and I suspect now it was also the case

Reagan's 2nd term, most likely a daily occurrence.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

the mole is a "sabotageur"

...French is such a challenging language...

and who the fuck the mole is to claim he is the "adults" running the show ?

if we wanted an adult to run the fucking WH, we wouldn't have voted for Trump in the first place, and everyone knows that

Originally Posted by tomcat

...French is such a challenging language...

oh shutup you silly tart, that seems to be your only wit catch phrase, go and have another fucking crepe, and put some chantilly on it

Originally Posted by uncle junior

Reagan's 2nd term, most likely a daily occurrence.

indeed, Bush was probably over riding all his decisions

I would dare say the same with Bush Junior, he doesn't seem to have much control after 911 in making any decisions, Cheney was

the perfect chimp to take the fall, for all Cheney mistakes

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

such as overiding the president orders of the day

That's hardly betraying democratic principles. More like exercising administrative prerogative to keep him from making a drastic mistake. He's not an infallible monarch.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

such as overiding the president orders of the day...

I would be interested if that was the case too under Obama, and I suspect now it was also the case

Doubt it. Trump is an undisciplined, easily distracted manchild who awakes from his Fox News stupor at 11:30 everyday to throw the WH into confusion and chaos. Obama was everything Trump is not - disciplined, hard working, articulate, focused, cerebral and dignified.

From one of W's speech writers.....

"Impeachment is a constitutional mechanism. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment is a constitutional mechanism. Mass resignations followed by voluntary testimony to congressional committees are a constitutional mechanism. Overt defiance of presidential authority by the president’s own appointees—now that’s a constitutional crisis."

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...crisis/569443/

Originally Posted by uncle junior

From one of W's speech writers.....

"Impeachment is a constitutional mechanism. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment is a constitutional mechanism. Mass resignations followed by voluntary testimony to congressional committees are a constitutional mechanism. Overt defiance of presidential authority by the president’s own appointees—now that’s a constitutional crisis."

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...crisis/569443/

It's ironic that you would pick W's writer. He was a fucking idiot who did precisely what the neocons and daddy told him to.

Baldy orange cunto isn't being defied here - he can sack anyone - but he's being manipulated the same as W was.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

he can sack anyone

That is precisely why he has been firing so many of his cabinet appointees. As long as the turnover is high there is chaos. No way to invoke the 25th.

they should invoke the 25th solely because he can't pronounce the word 'anonymous'.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It's ironic that you would pick W's writer. He was

Yeah maybe the guy found jesus or something.....bit ironic a mag like the Atlantic would pay a neo con money for an op-ed piece too......

Originally Posted by uncle junior

if the guy broke any laws it would be in regards to the 'resistance' he claims to be a part of and what they've done.

Wrong. If he/she has broken any laws it's civil in so far as it was probably breach of a non-dosclosure agreement, and that's all.
Whispering in the WH halls and agreeing amongst themselves that the pres is an idiot is a breach of no law. Making sure he doesn't sign an idiot proclamation breaks no laws.

Tell me, Uncle J, if you were in the oval office as a cleaner (say...or as an aide...anything whereby you were in that office) and you saw a document that Trump had written that proposed as an executive order that all children of Democrats will henceforth be neutered, and you knew that if the document went missing Trump would forget about it.
What would you do? Leave it and risk your boss being severely humiliated, or trash it knowing he wouldn't miss it and you wouldn't get caught?

Originally Posted by Humbert

That's hardly betraying democratic principles. More like exercising administrative prerogative to keep him from making a drastic mistake. He's not an infallible monarch.

it's a bit too easy, what they are doing is treacherous

next you are going to advocate that someone in the WH should shoot him and do the world a favor

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

advocate that someone in the WH should shoot him and do the world a favor

There's an idea that's more than likely already been mentioned.

Originally Posted by Humbert

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.dd55033c756e

Our insecure manchild president wants to use the DOJ to investigate who wrote the NYT op ed and the NYT for publishing it. The idiot wants to be a king.

He's considered himself king from the start. I recall a suggested solution to the Trump problem 18 months ago and in all seriousness it could have worked: Announce he is King of America then place him in one of his hotels to pretend to rule, but, like the queen of England, he'd be only a figure head. Meanwhile the country gets on with things with a newly elected president.

On what grounds would Trumpelthinskin use the DOJ to investigate? No crime has been commited.