a little comic relief from Larry David about John Kelly frowning at the trump....
can't get it to c&p
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/o...imes&smtyp=cur
actually the only reasons to move production is because it's a more efficient way to produce goods, and avoid companies to waste local resources for less efficient production (less productive)
Fed interference in business is required though, as a regulator role
however the system breaks down if more efficient production are moved offshore, for pure ideology, amd this is clearly the case in some industry, so companies can pollute more and not bother with regulations. In these situations, Fed interference is clearly warranted to stop companies shifting work offshore. This is clearly what all governments should go after.
Last oil refinery built in the USA in 1977.
Last edited by SKkin; 24-07-2018 at 02:58 PM.
I can understand why the USA, over the coming decades reduces it's commitment to/in NATO.
But, to suggest that the USA withdraw from the UN is rubbish.
Withdrawing from some UN conventions, not in it's best interest ... understandable, but to withdraw
completely is folly.
---
From another thread and not related to the above comment.
Referring to the rusted on TRUMP Supporters ...
We need a lot less of us(the USA) telling other nations that its our way or the highyway...seems we use the UN as a vehicle to do that quite a bit. See the current US Ambassador to the UN.
Except for all the ones built (not to mention the ones upgraded) since then.
The newest refineries currently operating in the United States
Year Built First Operated Location Original Owner Original Capacity b/cd Current Owner 2018 Capacity b/cd 2016 2017 Corpus Christi, Texas Magellan Midstream Partners 42,500 Magellan Midstream Partners 42,500 2015 2015 Corpus Christi, Texas Buckeye Partners 46,250 Buckeye Partners 60,000 2015 2015 Houston, Texas Petromax Refining 25,000 Petromax Refining 25,000 2014 2015
Dickinson, North DakotaDakota Prairie Refining 19,000 Andeavor 19,500 2014 2015 Galena Park, Texas Kinder Morgan 42,000 Kinder Morgan 84,000 1998 1998 Atmore, Alabama Goodway 4,100 Goodway 4,100 1993 1993 Valdez, Alaska Petro Star 26,300 Petro Star 55,000 1991 1992 Ely, Nevada Petro Source 7,000 Foreland 2,000 1986 1987 North Pole, Alaska Petro Star 6,700 Petro Star 19,700 1985 1986 Prudhoe Bay, Alaska ARCO 12,000 ConocoPhillips 15,000 1979 1980 Wilmington, California Huntway 5,400 Valero 6,300 1978 1979 Vicksburg, Mississippi Ergon 10,000 Ergon 26,500 1978 1979 North Slope, Alaska ARCO 13,000 BP Exploration, Alaska 6,500
How much do various countries contribute to the UN Budget?
70
The General Assembly has directed that percentage shares range from a minimum of 0.001% to a maximum of 22%, and a maximum of 0.01% for those nations designated as “least developed countries.”
The scale of assessments is normally reviewed after every three years. The current time period of assessments is for the years 2016-2018.
Who contributes the most to the regular UN budget?
As expected, United States of America contributes the highest with a share of 22%. USA’s GNP is approximately 27% of the total GNP of all the member countries of the UN and thus its highest share of contribution is justified.
Japan contributes the second highest with 9.68%, followed by China (7.921%), Germany (6.389%), France (4.859%) and UK (4.463%) in the top five. Brazil contributes about 3.823% and is 6th in this list.
18 Countries contribute more than 1% each to the UN regular budget. 135 countries contribute less than 0.1% each including India’s neighbours Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal.
Out of the 193 countries part of the UN, the top 20 countries contribute 83.78% while the other 173 countries contribute 16.22% only. The top 10 contributors account for 68.89% of the total contributions. The total regular UN budget for the year 2016-17 is $ 5.6 billion.
Last edited by mark45y; 24-07-2018 at 04:57 PM.
The reason the US puts all this money in is to maintain a disproportionate level of influence over the UN.
You should start shitting yourself when the Chinese offer to pick up the tab.
It’s true. He was the lead project engineer (subsequent to his Medal of Honor winning military career and whilst on a sabbatical from his Professorial duties at a black womans college).
To be honest my wife who is a Thai engineer in the petro chemical business was reading my post and corrected me as there have been a few refining operations built since I left Texas. Nothing big like the million and a half barrels a day at Jamnagar or the 3/4 million barrels per day at Port Arthur. She said the reason no refineries of any size are built in America anymore is because 1 billion needs to be spent in environmental studies before even ground can be broke. She is involved with Samsung's new billion US dollar petrochemical project in Thailand.
Originally Posted by mark45yOriginally Posted by mark45yYou're completely and utterly full of shite aren't you mark.Originally Posted by mark45y
Smegesque
Back to Trump.... (I wish you guys would just put him on ignore...please...I'm asking nicely.)
I'm 20 minutes in to this and it's a very good (so far) Young Turks edition.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)