Thread: All American friends are possible targets

Originally Posted by stroller

...and the destruction of Mosques.

Well, the Iraq invasion was, in a way, the revenge of the US and its allies for 9/11.
That's not the official policy, but if you listen to comments of US citizens and Brits, for example, retribution does play a part.

If you can't get those responsible directly, go for those you think are associated with them.

Well, if that would have been the case why did the US not bomb Iran after the Hostages crisis. They sure would have had a lot of support.

Originally Posted by machangezi

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Pakistan has a severe problem, should the ragheads take over the region, there will be BIG trouble. (aahemm don't forget to blame Israel for all this)

Why are the YIDS to be blamed?? I didn't say anything about Israel in this thread as far as I can remember.

Are you sure ?

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Well, if that would have been the case why did the US not bomb Iran after the Hostages crisis. They sure would have had a lot of support.

Look who was in the White House then?
Worst President in modern history...

Originally Posted by stroller

Well, the Iraq invasion was, in a way, the revenge of the US and its allies for 9/11.
That's not the official policy, but if you listen to comments of US citizens and Brits, for example, retribution does play a part.

If you can't get those responsible directly, go for those you think are associated with them.

The US was fully aware Iraq was not associated with 911 before the invasion.
The innuendo's and outright lies in the media was just spin, for the benefit of a gullible public looking for blame figures after the atrocity. It was quite convenient and easy to demonise Saddams Iraq. The neo-con's/ NPAC had been wanting to invade Iraq anyway, since at least 1999. It's in their writings.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by machangezi

WHAT??
Do you mean what will I do if Pakland is taken over by ragheads??

Well, the beach in Goa is always nice this time of year...

Sorry I don't understand Yiddish language Booners.

[quote=HermantheGerman;354700]

Originally Posted by machangezi

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Let's say the Vatican was blown up and the Pope was killed by radical muslims. How will the world (christians) react?

You don't know?? We all saw America bombing Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11 where the Terrorists attacked the twin towers and Pentagon. That was the reaction of the Christians, wasn't it??

The attack was master minded in Afghanistan, so the revenge was justified.
Why did the US invade Iraq I realy dont know. I could imagine that the jews were behind it to destabilize the region.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Now let's say a radical christian blows up Mecca. How will muslims react arround the world.

They will burn some effigies(sp?) burn some shops and stuff like that..... then they will all calm down after some time just the way they forgot Iraq and Afghanistan.

Either your not a real muslim or you are realy downplaying this scenario.
What I meant was Mecca the holy site Masjid al-Haram.

What's the point of these questions??

Aggression / Revenge

WHATEVER HERMAN. I WILL ONLY REPLY TO YOU IF YOU EXPLAIN YOUR POINT PROPERLY. I AIN'T PICKING ON YOU BUT HONESTLY I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT.

(I think) he says it is fine to kill Afghani civilians in retribution for 9/11, thus agreeing with you that revenge on innocent civilians is justified.

Hmmm ..... so it puts all the beheadings of innocent civilians in perspective, right Herman?

Originally Posted by machangezi

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by machangezi

WHAT??
Do you mean what will I do if Pakland is taken over by ragheads??

Well, the beach in Goa is always nice this time of year...

Sorry I don't understand Yiddish language Booners.

Sorry...thought you might have recognized that Goa (on India's southern coast) has some nice beaches is all and you might like it there?

It's a party spot for 'world-travellers' who enjoy "Goa Trance" music and for young ex-military Israelis on acid, you'd fit right in, Macha!

Originally Posted by machangezi

Today I went to a Paki restaurant where I had a lil chit chat with other Pakis who were having lunch there. They are all well educated and up to the western standards that qualify them as human beings! While having lunch someone talked about the statement that a white house spokesman gave a day ago. According to the white house spokesman "US is planning of direct action in tribal areas of Pakistan (NWFP).

I felt good to see them denouncing the fuckwit Mullahs who time and again encourage the general masses to kill the Westerners. One of them said something that really got me thinking. He asked "what would you guys do if one of the American missiles miss the target and land in your house, as it usually does?" For a while there was a pin drop silence but then the silence broke when one of them said "if any of my family members get hurt (forget being killed by those so called precision bombs), all Americans (soldiers and civilians) anywhere on earth are targets.

Let's put yourself in his shoes, walk a mile and then tell us what would you do in such situation? Should they be targeted (soldiers and civilians)? Who should be held responsible for deaths of Paki civilians, who have got nothing to do with al qaieda, and should Pakis do the same - target American civilians?

Let's see what you lot have got to say on this issue?

War is evil. Avoid it at all costs because innocent people will die.

What's WAR good for......

^
Sometimes for preserving freedom? (eg. WW II)

Some of these lads have no sense of history....good example Sir Burr. We'd all be speaking German if we'd listening to Chamberlain.

Originally Posted by britmaveric

Some of these lads have no sense of history...

Indeed , you'd be speaking Russian now...

Originally Posted by machangezi

Today I went to a Paki restaurant where I had a lil chit chat with other Pakis who were having lunch there. They are all well educated and up to the western standards that qualify them as human beings! While having lunch someone talked about the statement that a white house spokesman gave a day ago. According to the white house spokesman "US is planning of direct action in tribal areas of Pakistan (NWFP).

I felt good to see them denouncing the fuckwit Mullahs who time and again encourage the general masses to kill the Westerners. One of them said something that really got me thinking. He asked "what would you guys do if one of the American missiles miss the target and land in your house, as it usually does?" For a while there was a pin drop silence but then the silence broke when one of them said "if any of my family members get hurt (forget being killed by those so called precision bombs), all Americans (soldiers and civilians) anywhere on earth are targets.

Let's put yourself in his shoes, walk a mile and then tell us what would you do in such situation? Should they be targeted (soldiers and civilians)? Who should be held responsible for deaths of Paki civilians, who have got nothing to do with al qaieda, and should Pakis do the same - target American civilians?

Let's see what you lot have got to say on this issue?

If this is acceptable behavior, why don’t the Germans and Japanese kill every American (and Brit for that matter) they see to this day?
It seems to me, this middle east revenge culture as become acceptable behavior and is used as an excuse by the fanatic muslim apologists.
TH

Originally Posted by Thaihome

this middle east revenge culture as become acceptable behavior

If revenge is not acceptable behavior then what do you suggest?

Don't confuse WWII with the Middle east conflict.

revenge is perfectly understandable. too many rats in the same cage. its when the rats start to drag god into it that i get fucking mixed up.