Dear God, are you Krauts still whinging that it wasn't your fault? All this time and you still can't face up to what you did.Originally Posted by eceg
Just part and parcel of you being wrong about pretty much everything, personality or habit I couldn't say but it's definitely ingrained.Originally Posted by HermantheGerman
Probably, and then his mind escaped to 1942 and that's where his hate comes from. But the world is different now. Sort of feel sorry for him, I said I'm soft touch.Originally Posted by HermantheGerman
You're making a lot of sense for these parts.Originally Posted by eceg
I believe they have many times officially and otherwise over the years.Originally Posted by DrB0b
Nobody said anything about fault, but a straw man like that is needed by the clearly fading capacities that once produced respecteable posts instead going for bully insults.
Tragic, really.
^ The irony being that Mick cozied up to the Yermans in WW2. Aided and abetted did Mick![]()
A gathering and a fire
Following a morning spent gathering tinder and logs, eight men sat around a fire. As the weather closed in and the temperature dropped, they huddled together to stay warm.
Some more men, attracted by the light of the fire, joined the group. The first group then began to pass back burning embers in order to spread the heat, at which point even more people joined the group.
One of the original gatherers then stood up and said, “Hold on, these guys didn’t help build our fire, nor are they bringing wood to help keep it going. We can’t keep passing out embers like this or our fire will go out”.
He was chastised by his friends who stated that the others came from a camp that didn’t have much wood in the first place, and that others were not trained in wood gathering so it wasn’t their fault. They accused him of being selfish in denying strangers access to their heat source. In order to be seen to be doing the right thing, he sat down and said nothing.
So they carried on handing out the embers until all the wood was gone. The fire duly died down and extinguished and so, everyone perished from the cold……equally!
I'm an Englishman who lived more than 20 years in Germany, not a Kraut.
Young Germans cannot forget or forgive the nazis for their barbarity and the shame and guilt they brought on Germany. They have a heavy cross to bear for the sins of their grandparents.
The guiding principle of German Democracy is "Never Again". To ensure this "Never Again" Germans try to understand how such unimaginable things happened. They learn that repression such as the punitive reparations can lead to war and thus Germany is now a "softie" on the international stage. Learning from the mistakes of the past in order to avoid repeating them in the future is not whinging or denying those mistakes. Very few young Germans would claim "it wasn't our fault" but they would point out that "it wasn't my personal fault... I was born 50 years after the War ended!". Only a paranoid could regard Germans born after 1935 as dangerous animals.
Germany has faced up to what it did in the War in the best way possible; by having friendly and peaceful relations with all countries.
Why did DrBob cut off the question when quoting my original post?
"If even Israel and Poland can today live in mutual trust and respect with Germany, why can't DrBob?".
Last edited by eceg; 20-10-2015 at 02:07 AM.
I'm an Englishman who lived more than 20 years in Germany, not a Kraut.
Young Germans, cannot forget or forgive the nazis for their barbarity and the shame and guilt they brought to Germany. They have a heavy cross to bear for the sins of their grandparents.
The guiding principle of German Democracy is "Never Again". To ensure this "Never Again" Germans try to understand how such unimaginable things happened. They learn that repression such as the punitive reparations can lead to war and thus Germany is now a "softie" on the international stage. Learning from the mistakes of the past in order to avoid repeating them in the future is not whinging or denying those mistakes. Very few young Germans would claim "it wasn't our fault" but they would point out that "it wasn't my personal fault... I was born 50 years after the War ended!". Only a paranoid could regard Germans born after 1935 as dangerous animals.
Germany has faced up to what it did in the War in the best way possible; by having friendly and peaceful relations with all countries.
[/QUOTE]
![]()
WIth all respect to the OP, perhaps this thread should be renamed "Always a Crisis in Europe"
Herman, consider your leader's EU wants just this. You and Betty angry. So that they can come and claim to bring peace and harmony when both the UK and Germany are on their knees, waiting for the bullet. That comes from behind.Originally Posted by HermantheGerman
When will this christian lunatic Merkel give up ?Refugee policy: Austria calls "the end of the invitation policy" Germany in particular, said the Austrian Foreign Minister . Sebastian is convinced : " We are overwhelmed, there are just too many people coming . " 31.10.2015
Where will the next fence be build ?
European Project... Maggie or Churchill would have rejected it. In the fifties, ideas of European superstate... oops. now europe is a minor player in world economy. How the world changes.
Oh and Free Europe without EU and euro, bring back nation states and border controls.
Get back to EC, yeah cultural exchange is great, police co-op is great, but without any agri subsidies all will be better
Who remembers latest directive by bureaucratic machinery of EU? Well, the taxpayers will feel it, always later on and then some next year and next
Chris Story
When you understand that the people behind the EU, the Private Fereral Reserve, and the Soviet Union are all the same people.... you start to get a better understanding of what is really happening in Europe and what the end game is.Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA (1938 – 14 July 2010[1]) was an English writer, publisher and government adviser specialising in intelligence and economic affairs, who is perhaps best known for his collaboration with KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn on the 1995 book The Perestroika Deception.
Christopher Story, the son of Colonel Henry Harle Story MC of the Cameronians,[2] was educated at Eton College and Christ Church, Oxford, and then worked as an industrial writer in Canada. In 1963, he formed his own publishing company specialising in intelligence and founded "World Reports Limited" that year.[3]
Since 1970, Story edited and published International Currency Review,[4] which has included the World Bank, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank of England amongst its subscribers.[5] Story became an economic adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher,[6] and in 1991, a year after her resignation, he published Soviet Analyst due to his continued scepticism about Mikhail Gorbachev, perestroika and the official version of events in the Soviet Union.[7] Soviet Analyst was a respected journal whose previous editors included Robert Conquest and Tibor Szamuely,[8]
In May 1992, Story was approached by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, who supported Story's analysis of the Soviet Union in Soviet Analyst. Golitsyn handed over to Story his memoranda to the CIA, which Story edited and published in 1995 as The Perestroika Deception. In an interview in 1995, Story said: "The purpose of perestroika has been to convince the gullible West that communism is dead, that the Soviet Union has collapsed."[9] Story said that he agreed with Golitsyn that "the Sino-Soviet split was a deception which masked the continuing collaboration between the Russians and China."[10]
In 2002, Story published The European Union Collective, which applied Story's analysis to the European Union. He was also critical of the German intelligence establishment, pointing out its Nazi origins.[11] Story claimed that former British Prime Minister Edward Heath was "recruited by Germans before the war" and was an agent of "the secret Nazi strategic continuum since exposed as the Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau."[12]
Story claimed that successive European collective treaties have been routinely procured by means of bribery and that there was a corrupt financial incentive for ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force in 2009. Story claimed that slush fund money was being paid into offshore bank accounts for the top 'facilitators' of the treaty
Yes.
They failed to see that europe is nothing today, minor market, 20% and some. Europe no longer rules and their idea of global domination is just silly, they still try it in the EU. But the world does not care.
Originally Posted by pseudolus
Panam, when you agree with me as in your PM with red, why you sent me red? You are hard to read, man. Inshallal or whatev
Definitely whatev or his Bulgarian brother WherevOriginally Posted by Exit Strategy
Because it was a repo, not a PM. You're welcomeOriginally Posted by Exit Strategy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)