Thread: What Will It Take To Get Rid Of ISIS?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It comes soon after the United States announced a shake-up of its support to Syrian rebels fighting IS, effectively ending its program to train fighters outside Syria and focus instead on providing weapons to groups whose commanders have been U.S.-vetted.

There were rumours that the $5billion program had been stopped because the 5 or 6 moderate terrorist that actually graduated upon being given there brand new pickups, guns, sat phones, rpgs and manpads promptly went over to the other "bad" terrorist groups. The guys that were being attacked for being terrorists, the ones who allegedly brought the 9/11 "episode" to fruition, the ones the NATO forces fought for many years all over Asia. In fact the main target for the crusader coalition for many years.

They are now, of course, the "good" terrorists.

The US vetting was a piece of cake eh, great results for the money, manpower, time . But mostly for the 100,000s of civilians executed, raped or just shot in the head and left in the desert by the "good" terrorists around the world.

Pure make believe.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The YPG has to date proved the most effective partner on the ground for U.S.-led air strikes against Islamic State, taking large amounts of territory from the jihadists in northeast Syria this year.

If as the crusader coalition leaders state the bad ISIS terrorists are in the north east of Syria. That is over to the right adjacent Iraq, Iran and Turkey. Why are they mainly based in the north west corner of Syria, that is sandwiched between the Syrian army and the Turkish border? If there are nos ISIS terrorist actually there to fight.