Quote Originally Posted by Neverna
I doubt it. And the 150,000 troops mentioned in western rags are brand new recruits. Would Putin really risk failure in Syria by sending in new recruits? I doubt it. The story stinks a bit to me, but you never know. We'll have to wait and see.
Some have alleged that the story originated from a signing, by the democratically elected president of Russia, of an annual Russian decree authorising the recruitment, within Russia, of the new conscripts. Something that happens every year.

As such this is a non-event. The MSM portray it as new cannon fodder. Currently the Russian parliament has passed a law authorising the Russian President only to supply supporting aerial assistance plus supporting maintenance and protection forces. All of which the MSM has been informed of.

One wonders that with the Iranian, Hezbollah and the Kurdish ground forces whether the deployment of regular trained Russian troops would be necessary.

The crusader coalition media are unfortunately whining because the Russian organised coalition are actually planning to achieve something rather than lying to thier citizens.

The days of crusader coalition and their alligned puppet ME rulers is coming quickly to their end.