Thread: What Will It Take To Get Rid Of ISIS?

I think the coalition bombing ISIS in Syria is acceptable if they do it in an environmentally-friendly way, and keep emissions from burning civilians as low as possible.

Originally Posted by OhOh

Syrian Airforce or SAM2 are is targeting whichever terrorist group it wishes

Well, the terrorists happened to be ordinary people, in that village.

And SAM means surface to air missile

Oh dear, DIY wannadogood

It's curious how your level of English vacillates...

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

It's curious how your level of English vacillates...

He's Canadian, pretending to be American.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

It's curious how your level of English vacillates...

Maybe he's been using different vacillines.

Originally Posted by MrG

Maybe he's been using different vacillines

???

Originally Posted by Exit Strategy

Well, the terrorists happened to be ordinary people, in that village. And SAM means surface to air missile

Which village might "that" be, Plaistow, West Sussex? Nothing ordinary about them, they are very HiSO I will have you know.

You mean SAM has other meaning, well blow me down and tickle me with a feather. I always assumed it was taken from a girlfriend of mine Sam Bliss - she certainly was blissfully attentive with me.

Originally Posted by OhOh

Plaistow, West Sussex

No, northern reaches of King Arthur. No intention of blowing you mate

You mean Bliss on 3rd road Patts nearly opposite Xcite club where they do it very good Nice ladies.

Originally Posted by Exit Strategy

I have driven in europe, and it was not nice

Originally Posted by Exit Strategy

Volkswagen Audi Skoda and now Merc

Have no fear, the head chopping, stoners are ready and willing to support any anti Assad forces.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/30/wo...ref=world&_r=0

"Adel al-Jubeir, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, said Tuesday that there were no circumstances in which his country would accept the Russian effort to keep Mr. Assad in power.

He hinted that if a political solution that led to his departure could not be found, the shipment of weapons and other support to Syrian rebel groups would be increased.

“Whatever we may or may not do we are not talking about,” Mr. Jubeir said. “There is a moderate Syrian opposition that is fighting against Bashar al-Assad, and this opposition is getting support from a number of countries, and we expect that this support will continue and be intensified.”


The crusader coalition is not fighting their terrorists then. I wonder if the Syrian government agrees with that definition. Does this "moderate Syrian opposition" condone the slaughtering of innocent civilians in it's name?


M of A - Syria: Thoughts On The Russian Air Support


"The U.S. and its European lap dogs are now outraged, OUTRAGED that the Russians did not hit the Islamic State but al-Qaeda. "They claimed to fight the Islamic State. How could they hit our moderate rebels and their friendly al-Qaeda cooperation partners?"

One of the eight Russian targets was in Rastan in Homs governate. No Islamic State there claims the "western" propaganda.


Except that just nine days ago the Islamic State shot dead seven men in Rastan for being allegedly gay."


Is this the same al-Qaeda they have been fighting since the twin towers event?

ISIS Wants to Plant Its Black Flags In Europe. Will it Succeed?

You couldn't make this shit up.

So which is which. One of these is the ISIS emblem, and the other is the patch issued to US soldiers allegedly fighting ISIS.



I guess either way, the US snipers will see it, and know that no matter which one the person is wearing, they are not to shoot them as it will be on a friendly fighter.

"You can keep that ISIS patch featuring swords that chop off our heads," wrote David Clay, a former Army chief warrant officer.

Nazi and Sanskrit swastikas:



Aircraft Roundel of Finnish Air Force from 1918 - 1944



OMG, we're going to be invaded by Nazi Buddhist Hindus in Finnish planes!

Finland, in ww2, was aligned with the nazis following the Soviet attack on them, and the reluctance of the Allied forces to join with them against their Allie, the Soviet Union.

There is a clear difference between the Nazi swastika and the sanskit swasti, which as you will know because you have not gone to snopes of some such rubbish to try to ridicule something, that the swasti comes in two forms, one signifying evolution, and the other involution. Rare to see a single one, except when some idiot is trying to say that the Nazi's took their swastika from them, which they didn't. They took theirs from the Aryans, not the Hindus. But you knew that, and certainly would not believe the bullshit about it being Hindu.

So what are you trying to say?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So what are you trying to say?

That they are as broadly similar as those two patch-thingies.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So what are you trying to say?

That they are as broadly similar as those two patch-thingies.

But having learnt the reasons, not that I am saying that an intellectual titan such as yourself who would of course have know those reasons for them being so close, didn't know already, now please educate me why, out of ALL the other possible millions of designs they would have used, they decided to copy the emblam of the terrorist force that they created to destabilize Syria, which they created about 20 seconds after caMoron was defeated in the test vote to get the Axis of Evil approval to bomb Syria, destroy it, and remove the current government.

I have no idea I'm not privvy to such things, pretty sure they didn't deliberately copy it though, but thanks for the faux-compliment regardless.

Incidentally Google tells me that the patch above is from the Muslim Brotherhood not ISIS.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

I thought it was Putin who asked the west first if he can join the fun ?

Putin did it anyway because the US and UK created, funded and armed ISIS need to be destroyed. The US is really pissed off about it, and so is Israel who now can not bomb civilians (you know, schools, hospitals etc - their favourite targets)

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Empathy ? You mean how Palestian have been treating their own women and children like dirt ?

Bollocks. Just a load of zionist nonsense spread about to create emotional support to the israels daily terror campaign against them. Actions like this one;



12 years old. Died next to his father who was trying to protect him.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Have to admit, I like your answers. They have a touch of a James Bond movie. Ever thought about writing a book ?

You know that a lot of the initial James Bond books were based upon real events, right? Well, of course you didn't.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Let's face it: "The House of Saud is finally getting what they deserve !"
Their days are numbered.

Good - but they will not go until the USD crashes. At which point we need to hope the people of Arabia remove them, and not the merkins lashing out, and installing another despotic family to do their bidding.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Muslim Brotherhood not ISIS.

Corporate face of ISIS.

Good to see Putin bombing the shit out of IS.

Shame he missed though.

I'm sure that was all a big accident.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Muslim Brotherhood not ISIS.

Corporate face of ISIS.

In the same way that Saddam was the corporate face for 9/11?

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Empathy ? You mean how Palestian have been treating their own women and children like dirt

Raped, and beaten. I think that has been reported by the police in Germany but some politiancs choose to ingore it.

Originally Posted by Exit Strategy

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Empathy ? You mean how Palestian have been treating their own women and children like dirt

Raped, and beaten. I think that has been reported by the police in Germany but some politiancs choose to ingore it.

Remember when the Russians didn't love their children too?

Common tactic in dehumanizing the 'enemy' that: invoke an image of monsters beating their wives and not caring for their children.