Quote Originally Posted by Takeovers View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fozzy View Post
^ Sorry for being slow but I don't get what point you're making. Limiting the number of children allowed to two and then to one may not be enough but how could it possibly be anything other than an improvement and a good place to start?
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I mean 2 children is still too many in large parts of the world. It really needs 1 like China. I am aware though that even a 2 children policy would not be enforcible anywhere except China.


Quote Originally Posted by Fozzy View Post
It's simply utter fucking madness that inbred fuckwits who aren't even capable of keeping themselves bathed and wearing clean clothes, let alone educated and employed, are allowed to bring 3, 4, 6, you name it amount of children in to the world. Needs to he stopped asap!
Full agreement. But of course we have no right to interfere with the internal policy or culture of any country. But then maybe we should not interfere with the next famine or Ebola outbreak.
If the weather patterns keep destabilizing like they have been then we wont have to worry about overpopulation as most will starve to death before population becomes a problem.

How quickly do you think the population will decrease if people couldn't go down to the local Walmart or whatever and pick up enough food to feed their 6 welfare fatherless children? How many would be able to hunt and grow their own food?

The developing nations would fare better imo just because they are not too far removed from that lifestyle yet.