Quote Originally Posted by Neo
It seems that 20th century borders are changing and will do in more places yet. I think it's acceptable, at least it has to be accepted if it happens as part of a changing political and social landscape
Borders might need to change sometimes but it should be a political process not a military one.

Why doesn't Russia offer Ukraine 10 years free gas supply in exchange for accepting the unnegotiated loss of their territory? Should 21st century countries have to put up with such caveman aggression without compensation?

Their belligerence is not going to fly in the modern world. Global politics are too sophisticated nowadays. A price will have to be paid. The world will not forget Russia's oafish and clumsy strategy.

Quote Originally Posted by Neo
Personally I find it hard to argue against the logic of Russia annexing Crimea, because it's strategic importance is clear.
Its strategic importance is just as valuable to Ukraine as to Russia. Why does this justify its daylight theft?

Quote Originally Posted by Neo
In the ongoing escalation, Crimea is Russia's Ace in the hole. A deterrent, rather than a threat.
Invasion and theft of foreign land is not deterrence. It is bare faced and unacceptable aggression.