How dangerous is Vladimir Putin?

**harrybarracuda** · 23-10-2016, 01:39 PM

**Neverna** · 23-10-2016, 02:07 PM

The issue isn't really who the casualties were, Harry, but if you are saying the Belgians deliberately targetted Syrian government troops, that will certainly bring a new dynamic to the conflict.

**Dragonfly** · 23-10-2016, 02:09 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by MrG

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

will soon be swallowing gizz from Putin 9'' cock

You're obsessed with the idea, aren't you DraginAss?

not as much as Harry and quite a few here. They keep referring to cocks everytime they have a chance.

Probably a small penis syndrome.

Oh dear.

https://teakdoor.com/members-only/

still stalking, harry ? are you now a stalker on the top of your "positive" contributions insulting everyone in every other threads ?

keep up the good work

**Dragonfly** · 23-10-2016, 02:12 PM

Originally Posted by Neverna

The issue isn't really who the casualties were, Harry, but if you are saying the Belgians deliberately targetted Syrian government troops, that will certainly bring a new dynamic to the conflict.

wtf were Belgium doing strike for ? under NATO ? under their own ?

interesting twist, this is really WW3 and it's going to blow in our face because of our coward leaders

**harrybarracuda** · 23-10-2016, 02:27 PM

Originally Posted by Neverna

The issue isn't really who the casualties were, Harry, but if you are saying the Belgians deliberately targetted Syrian government troops, that will certainly bring a new dynamic to the conflict.

Well firstly we haven't actually seen any evidence that they even did it.

And secondly, if they were in fact protecting civilians from further war crimes by the Syrian Army, I would obviously not be opposed to it; would you?

But if you're asking me to believe Putin's account, forget it.

**Neverna** · 23-10-2016, 02:31 PM

Perhaps the Russians will publish what they say is their proof. (Or perhaps it will be leaked. LOL)

**Dragonfly** · 23-10-2016, 02:52 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Well firstly we haven't actually seen any evidence that they even did it.

that never stopped you before from making similar claims, such as the Hillary emails etc... without a shred of evidence, just a hint

quite the double standard, harry.

**Dragonfly** · 23-10-2016, 02:54 PM

Originally Posted by Neverna

Perhaps the Russians will publish what they say is their proof. (Or perhaps it will be leaked. LOL)

Knowing what we know now about Americans and their European allies, we know manipulation of information is at the core of everything

I believe more the Russians these days than anything from an America or European sources, quite a few dishonest people with hiden interests

at least the Russians are clear about what they intend to do,

**harrybarracuda** · 23-10-2016, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Well firstly we haven't actually seen any evidence that they even did it.

that never stopped you before from making similar claims, such as the Hillary emails etc... without a shred of evidence, just a hint

That's because you don't read posts properly.

**OhOh** · 23-10-2016, 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by Neverna

It speaks of either Mr Vandeput’s misunderstanding of the document provided by Russia, or the desire of the US Armed Forces Central Command, responsible for providing targeting data to aircraft of the international coalition in Syria, to evade responsibility for the death of six Syrian civilians, killed in the airstrike,” Konashenkov told journalists.

So the poor old Belgium pilots asleep in their beds whilst their planes are tucked up in their own a/c hangers. All the time some "ghost" planes are attacking something in Syria with some "dodgy" ID numbers attributed to the Belgium air-planes by an Ameristani government agency are illegally starting a war.

Somebody needs to check the Ameristani airplane ID system and see if the Russians are able to hack it.

Originally Posted by Neverna

According to Konashenkov, the two Belgian F-16s were immediately identified by Russian and Syrian air defense radar and all of their movements were tracked. “Every aircraft type has a unique identifiable signature,” he noted.

"Managed"

by an Ameristani government agency who surely wouldn't want Russia to attack Belgium after they started a war.

Nah, the Ameristanis surely wouldn't use a fellow NATO countries identity fraudulently, or would they?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Civilians probably equals government militia.

Most probably it was just a mistake,, they had the wrong "intelligence" from the Crusader coalition headquarters,. The Belgians, allegedley but who knows, were told it was a wedding party, being held at the local children's hospital.

"Somebody" will issue a press release and the 17 government agencies will parrot it, it will get into the dark cloud, harry will spot it and quote the lies here, for ever and ever and call it a fact.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Only the Russians are claiming this was a civilian target. You're the idiot that swallows their nonsense. (Not the only one, obviously).

The white helmets will be on the scene in a jiffy, will release some shaky videos - taken from a drones flying at 1,000m with probably Belgium ID emitters (purchased at the local wallmart in Houston) and describe how the Russians are to blame.

YRAVBAA © harrybarracuda

**harrybarracuda** · 23-10-2016, 05:50 PM

Silly Russians making shit up again.

Speaking at a press conference in the late afternoon, Vandeput gave a possible explanation that could solve the whole issue. A triumphant Vandeput told journalists "I have the Russian evidence here with me. We had a look at this so-called evidence, and we see that the plane numbers mentioned there, their electronic number plates, cannot be linked to Belgian fighter jets."

"What we see is that the Russians have made a mistake. We hope they will realise soon that they have actually supplied the evidence we were not there. We expect their apologies in the shortest terms."

Belgium counters Russian accusations and "expects apologies in the short term"

**Neverna** · 24-10-2016, 12:16 AM

,,,,,,,,

**OhOh** · 25-10-2016, 04:12 PM

A Russian General has, allegedly, spoken, October 6th, regarding his countries assets in Syria and what will happen if Syria's airspace is misused.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ry?id=42618586

General Konashenkov: Russia will take down any unidentified flying objects in Syria | The Vineyard of the Saker

He states regarding their effectiveness, "The radius of the weapons reach may be “a surprise” to all unidentified flying objects."

Should that statement no be changed to include "all aircraft showing incorrect/manipulated FOF ID's" ?Are these FOF ID's able to be changed in flight, by either the pilot or some authorised

person stationed possibly 1,000 of miles away at the press of a button, via an integrated comms system?Would the plane's pilot be aware of such a switch, if instigated over such a system?

**harrybarracuda** · 25-10-2016, 04:25 PM

Originally Posted by OhOh

A Russian General has spoken, October 6th, regarding his countries assets in Syria and what will happen if Syria's airspace is misused.

General Konashenkov: Russia will take down any unidentified flying objects in Syria | The Vineyard of the Saker

He states regarding their effectiveness, "The radius of the weapons reach may be “a surprise” to all unidentified flying objects."

Should that statement no be changed to include "all aircraft showing incorrect/manipulated FOF ID's" ?Are these FOF ID's able to be changed in flight, by either the pilot or some authorised

person stationed possibly 1,000 of miles away at the press of a button, via an integrated comms system?Would the plane's pilot be aware of such a switch, if instigated over such a system?

Yes, of course. Russia are there to defeat ISIS.

They need all this stuff to defend against the ISIS air force.

**Neo** · 25-10-2016, 10:19 PM

You're such a wingnut Harry

**Dragonfly** · 26-10-2016, 02:06 AM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Silly Russians making shit up again.

Speaking at a press conference in the late afternoon, Vandeput gave a possible explanation that could solve the whole issue. A triumphant Vandeput told journalists "I have the Russian evidence here with me. We had a look at this so-called evidence, and we see that the plane numbers mentioned there, their electronic number plates, cannot be linked to Belgian fighter jets."

"What we see is that the Russians have made a mistake. We hope they will realise soon that they have actually supplied the evidence we were not there. We expect their apologies in the shortest terms."

Belgium counters Russian accusations and "expects apologies in the short term"

so did they apologize ?

**harrybarracuda** · 26-10-2016, 02:32 AM

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Silly Russians making shit up again.

Speaking at a press conference in the late afternoon, Vandeput gave a possible explanation that could solve the whole issue. A triumphant Vandeput told journalists "I have the Russian evidence here with me. We had a look at this so-called evidence, and we see that the plane numbers mentioned there, their electronic number plates, cannot be linked to Belgian fighter jets."

"What we see is that the Russians have made a mistake. We hope they will realise soon that they have actually supplied the evidence we were not there. We expect their apologies in the shortest terms."

Belgium counters Russian accusations and "expects apologies in the short term"

so did they apologize ?

*sigh* What do you think?

**OhOh** · 26-10-2016, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yes, of course. Russia are there to defeat ISIS. They need all this stuff to defend against the ISIS air force.

Of course, who do you think?

These are some of its planes.

They all have this stuck on their wings to confuse the sheeple.

They may even have ISIS designated FOF ID numbers.

One must also remember to take precautions against the ISIS airbases.

Don't be confused with the flag, they can be readily pulled down.

Not to be confused with US Navy Fags.

**bsnub** · 26-10-2016, 11:58 AM

Originally Posted by OhOh

confuse the sheeple.

You are the personification of the word. A gullible fool who will swallow any piece of Russian propaganda no matter how absurd.

The only reason I return to this thread is to laugh at your ridiculous naivety. A truly laughable moron.

I just wish someone would kidnap you and airdrop you into Raqqa.

**OhOh** · 26-10-2016, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

The only reason I return to this thread is to laugh at your ridiculous naivety.

Good to hear you are amused. I thought it was to post some enlightening news.

Still it's a g or two, and it all helps

Originally Posted by bsnub

I just wish someone would kidnap you and airdrop you into Raqqa.

A whipraound of the millionaires here and I'll go. Send you some more photos of the Ameristan latrine diggers at work.

**Dragonfly** · 26-10-2016, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Silly Russians making shit up again.

Speaking at a press conference in the late afternoon, Vandeput gave a possible explanation that could solve the whole issue. A triumphant Vandeput told journalists "I have the Russian evidence here with me. We had a look at this so-called evidence, and we see that the plane numbers mentioned there, their electronic number plates, cannot be linked to Belgian fighter jets."

"What we see is that the Russians have made a mistake. We hope they will realise soon that they have actually supplied the evidence we were not there. We expect their apologies in the shortest terms."

Belgium counters Russian accusations and "expects apologies in the short term"

so did they apologize ?

*sigh* What do you think?

I think Russia should bomb Belgium, just for good measure

possibly a Flamand area, 2 birds with 1 stone, win-win for everyobody

**harrybarracuda** · 26-10-2016, 03:49 PM

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I think Russia should bomb Belgium, just for good measure

possibly a Flamand area, 2 birds with 1 stone, win-win for everyobody

Brilliant idea.

When are you home again?

**bsnub** · 26-10-2016, 03:53 PM

^ hahaha! Just shows how far the retardation exists.

**bsnub** · 26-10-2016, 03:54 PM

Buttplug and OhDOH

two of the stupidest morons on TD.

**harrybarracuda** · 26-10-2016, 04:18 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Buttplug and OhDOH

two of the stupidest morons on TD.

Now now, you don't want to stifle competition between them and Cold Pizza.

Thread: How dangerous is Vladimir Putin?

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions