Thread: Contact lost with Malaysia Plane.

Drawn by a nine year old?

Get real ENT.

It was meant for your level of comprehension, harry

All that debris found so far suggests to me that MH370 came down somewhere between 5 degrees south latitude to around latitude 10 -12 degrees south, and aprox. longitude 70 to 80 east.

If the stuff originated much further south, more in the mid-southern Indian ocean, debris wouldn't have made it across to any point along the East African coastline, but would have more likely ended up going along the Antarctic current to Australia.

If the plane came down closer to Australia, debris should have reached the West Australian coast then the coast of Sumatra, before flowing across to Africa.

Nothing found at all on the eastern shores of the ocean, all the debris seems to have spread by the Southern Equatorial current from a central area between Lat 5 -13 S and Long 75 - 80 E, aprox.

Originally Posted by ENT

All that debris found so far suggests to me that MH370 came down somewhere between 5 degrees south latitude to around latitude 10 -12 degrees south, and aprox. longitude 70 to 80 east.

If the stuff originated much further south, more in the mid-southern Indian ocean, debris wouldn't have made it across to any point along the East African coastline, but would have more likely ended up going along the Antarctic current to Australia.

If the plane came down closer to Australia, debris should have reached the West Australian coast then the coast of Sumatra, before flowing across to Africa.

Nothing found at all on the eastern shores of the ocean, all the debris seems to have spread by the Southern Equatorial current from a central area between Lat 5 -13 S and Long 75 - 80 E, aprox.

It's amazing how that dysfunctional brain cell of yours can invent entire posts of utter nonsense even in the face of incontrovertible evidence.

You're a fucking whackjob alright.

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

Originally Posted by ENT

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

The current search area is completely compatible with the location of the debris found so far.

Look at the map the grown ups made rather than your badly daubed children's masterpiece.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

The current search area is completely compatible with the location of the debris found so far.

Look at the map the grown ups made rather than your badly daubed children's masterpiece.

Harry, after one of the biggest aerial and navel searches ever, not one piece of wreckage was found in the search area.

The bits found lately can only be a small percentage of what was originally floating. oil slicks would have broken up, other parts would have sunk over time and other parts washed up in areas not searched.

Remembering, all of this debris would have been in a close proximity originally, missing it would have been hard, not impossible, but unlikely.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

The current search area is completely compatible with the location of the debris found so far.

Look at the map the grown ups made rather than your badly daubed children's masterpiece.

Harry, after one of the biggest aerial and navel searches ever, not one piece of wreckage was found in the search area.

The bits found lately can only be a small percentage of what was originally floating. oil slicks would have broken up, other parts would have sunk over time and other parts washed up in areas not searched.

Remembering, all of this debris would have been in a close proximity originally, missing it would have been hard, not impossible, but unlikely.

The bits that have been found all seem to me to point to a low-speed full flaps water landing, which would leave most of the airframe intact and free to sink into Davy Jones Locker approximately where they are looking.

It is no surprise that they didn't find these parts while searching such an enormous area.

They've only been found because they were sat on beaches waiting for someone to trip over them.

So I don't go for this "All this debris" theory.

There may be more still to be found, but don't be surprised if it's just more flaps or cowlings.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The bits that have been found all seem to me to point to a low-speed full flaps water landing, which would leave most of the airframe intact and free to sink into Davy Jones Locker approximately where they are looking.

Now I believe little in what I read, but the Rolls Royce piece and the interior panel are allegedly, most likely from MH 360.

Interior, means not just wings, lots of personal items now found, most will be just junk, but if anything does get positively IDed, intact sinking is out the window.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The bits that have been found all seem to me to point to a low-speed full flaps water landing, which would leave most of the airframe intact and free to sink into Davy Jones Locker approximately where they are looking.

Now I believe little in what I read, but the Rolls Royce piece and the interior panel are allegedly, most likely from MH 360.

Interior, means not just wings, lots of personal items now found, most will be just junk, but if anything does get positively IDed, intact sinking is out the window.

Emphasis on the word "allegedly". A mad American on a pilgrimage to find the plane showing the Angry Birds bag and some plastic he found on a beach is not a confirmed finding.

Yet considering you believe little in what you read, you claim ''lots of personal items now found'' when nothing that's been found has been tied to the missing plane.

Update:


SERI KEMBANGAN: Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai has confirmed that personal items found in Madagascar recently, does not belong to MH370 passengers.

The Transport Minister said authorities confirmed that the belongings were not linked with the Boeing 777 that went missing since March 8, 2014.

"Authorities have confirmed that the personal items found does not belong to MH370. After analysing the belongings, it was found not linked to the passengers of the missing plane," he told reporters after opening the 9th Hui Zhou World Convention at Wisma Huazhong here, today.

Previously, US lawyer Blaine Gibson had claimed that he found some 20 items, including an Angry Birds bag and a Mensa laptop case, believed to belong to the passengers of the ill-fated flight.

He found them on the same 18km stretch of beach, where he had earlier found suspected aircraft parts of the missing plane.

Personal items found in Madagascar not linked to MH370 - Liow | Astro Awani

Come on Harry, they can ID junk on a beach, but not plane parts, how did they anglicize the stuff.
CSI Los Vegas couldn't tell who owned an angry bird bag after it had been in the sea.

As far as I know Malaysia hasn't even picked the stuff up yet, perhaps they used the coconut guy again.

As said, don't believe much said on the web.

Just to be clear, are you saying the interior panel is not from the MH flight.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

The current search area is completely compatible with the location of the debris found so far.

Look at the map the grown ups made rather than your badly daubed children's masterpiece.

Oh boy.

Look at the map you posted, it shows the same Southern Equatorial current as the one I posted.

You still believe that INMARSAT's fuzzy maths is the best indicator yet of where the plane ended up, but no evidence to support their contention has come to light.

The latest piece of wing found at Pemba Island ( aprox 5 degrees South latitude) drifted there with the most northerly branch of the Southern Equatorial stream, indicating it's origin was from somewhere east and only a few degrees south of the equator.

A ditching somewhere near south western Australia or more central areas of the Indian ocean, would result in most of the debris drifting counter-clockwise, to be finally pulled along by either the most northern currents of the Antarctic ocean towards Australia and either up the Australian west coast to Sumatra, finally, or east towards Tasmania, or by the weaker, inner, most southern flows of the westward moving South Equatorial current to re-circle the central Southern Indian Ocean along with the other millions of bits of junk already gathered there.

In the INMARSAT scenario, no debris could have reached as far north as Pemba island, nor would have passed between Madagascar and Africa, it would have remained in the central South Indian ocean locus.

Similarly, if the plane ditched in the sea north of the equator, none of it would end up in Madagascar or Pemba, either.

So any debris finds in the Maldives are not from MH370, impossible, given that all identifiable MH370 wreckage was found south of the equator.

I wonder if they had a chance to take a test flight with the ACARS pinging away to test that INMARSAT trajectory. Would certainly have helped to characterize some of the uncertainties in the theory that was used to dictate the search area.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

Come on Harry, they can ID junk on a beach, but not plane parts, how did they anglicize the stuff.
CSI Los Vegas couldn't tell who owned an angry bird bag after it had been in the sea.

As far as I know Malaysia hasn't even picked the stuff up yet, perhaps they used the coconut guy again.

As said, don't believe much said on the web.

Just to be clear, are you saying the interior panel is not from the MH flight.

I really don't know what you are trying to say. "Anglicise"? It clearly states that the personal items were not from MH370. One of them was an Angry Birds bag.


As for the "interior panel" if it's part of door R1 as stated then there's every chance that also deformed and popped out when the plane pancaked, so no argument there.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

My dear intellectually challenged friend, do you have a better idea of where that plane might have crashed, and if so, where?

The current search area is completely compatible with the location of the debris found so far.

Look at the map the grown ups made rather than your badly daubed children's masterpiece.

Oh boy.

Look at the map you posted, it shows the same Southern Equatorial current as the one I posted.

You still believe that INMARSAT's fuzzy maths is the best indicator yet of where the plane ended up, but no evidence to support their contention has come to light.

The latest piece of wing found at Pemba Island ( aprox 5 degrees South latitude) drifted there with the most northerly branch of the Southern Equatorial stream, indicating it's origin was from somewhere east and only a few degrees south of the equator.

A ditching somewhere near south western Australia or more central areas of the Indian ocean, would result in most of the debris drifting counter-clockwise, to be finally pulled along by either the most northern currents of the Antarctic ocean towards Australia and either up the Australian west coast to Sumatra, finally, or east towards Tasmania, or by the weaker, inner, most southern flows of the westward moving South Equatorial current to re-circle the central Southern Indian Ocean along with the other millions of bits of junk already gathered there.

In the INMARSAT scenario, no debris could have reached as far north as Pemba island, nor would have passed between Madagascar and Africa, it would have remained in the central South Indian ocean locus.

Similarly, if the plane ditched in the sea north of the equator, none of it would end up in Madagascar or Pemba, either.

So any debris finds in the Maldives are not from MH370, impossible, given that all identifiable MH370 wreckage was found south of the equator.

Considering you have an imaginary oceanography degree, I'm somewhat surprised you haven't considered any of the variables.

Then again it doesn't fit your bullshit whackjob story to do so, does it?

Now you've given me a degree in oceanography!

All those degrees you've laid on me either makes me an Einstein or makes you really thick.

Originally Posted by thailazer

I wonder if they had a chance to take a test flight with the ACARS pinging away to test that INMARSAT trajectory. Would certainly have helped to characterize some of the uncertainties in the theory that was used to dictate the search area.

I don't think that was much of an issue. What was the issue was how far the plane could have travelled, and in what direction, from the time it did the last squawk.

Correct. And if there was a mechanical or electrical problem, it may not have traveled very far before going down. I wonder where the closest point was projectd to be ?

Probably Diego Garcia.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Now you've given me a degree in oceanography!

All those degrees you've laid on me either makes me an Einstein or makes you really thick.

I said "Imaginary" dear boy.

That's right, all in your imagination, harry.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Now you've given me a degree in oceanography!

All those degrees you've laid on me either makes me an Einstein or makes you really thick.

I said "Imaginary" dear boy.

That's right, all in your imagination, harry.

Actually I'm pretty clear that you know fuck all about all the topics you learn in five minutes on shit web pages.

It's you who is deluded into thinking you make any sense at all passing off whackjob conspiracy theories as your own.

Ah, now you think you're a clairvoyant!

Have you any clues as to where the plane went down harry?

Originally Posted by ENT

Ah, now you think you're a clairvoyant!

Have you any clues as to where the plane went down harry?

Somewhere near where it last tried to contact the satellite, which is kind of why they've spent 100m looking in that area (and haven't finished yet BTW).

Are you a bit thick or do you just not read anything other than whackjob websites?