^So tell us how Chomsky got everything wrong in his career. You do know he's primarily a linguist, don't you? Looking forward to your analysis of Chomsky's linguistic errors. Here's something to start you off with, it's nothing to do with Oswald so it must be wrong. Tell us where Chomsky's screwed up here;

"Chomsky's system...has attracted the most attention and has received the most extensive exemplification and further development. As outlined in Syntactic Structures (1957), it comprised three sections, or components: the phrase-structure component, the transformational component, and the morphophonemic component. Each of these components consisted of a set of rules operating upon a certain "input" to yield a certain "output." The notion of phrase structure may be dealt with independently of its incorporation in the larger system. In the following system of rules, S stands for Sentence, NP for Noun Phrase, VP for Verb Phrase, Det for Determiner, Aux for Auxiliary (verb), N for Noun, and V for Verb stem.
This is a simple phrase-structure grammar. It generates and thereby defines as grammatical such sentences as "The man will hit the ball," and it assigns to each sentence that it generates a structural description. The kind of structural description assigned by a phrase-structure grammar is, in fact, a constituent structure analysis of the sentence." Linguistics: Methods of synchronic linguistic analysis: TRANSFORMATIONAL-GENERATIVE GRAMMAR: Chomsky's grammar.



Aside from the fact that you don't appear to know anything about Chomsky outside the political sphere I think you're right. He appears to be suffering form the "Bono effect". This effect states that anybody who's famed in one sphere must automatically know everything about everything, it's also known as the "celebrities talking crap syndrome".