Where ? all I saw were opinions about the existence of Israel. No more valid or worse than the reasons for a Palestinian state.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Where ? all I saw were opinions about the existence of Israel. No more valid or worse than the reasons for a Palestinian state.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
do expand on this earl.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
please.
^
The Joooos have turned that desert into a Garden for starters.
You want more?
How many Nobel Prizes have been awarded to them Joooos vs. the Pali's, eh?![]()
Another non sequitur.![]()
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Wasn't Palestine a wasteland before the Jews started immigrating there?
"Britain's high commissioner for Palestine, John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. He said 'all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jews without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators'...The Colonial Office rejected the recommendation." John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice.
In 1919, the American King-Crane Commission spent six weeks in Syria and Palestine, interviewing delegations and reading petitions. Their report stated, "The commissioners began their study of Zionism with minds predisposed in its favor...The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission's conferences with Jewish representatives that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase...
"If [the] principle [of self-determination] is to rule, and so the wishes of Palestine's population are to be decisive as to what is to be done with Palestine, then it is to be remembered that the non-Jewish population of Palestine—nearly nine-tenths of the whole—are emphatically against the entire Zionist program...To subject a people so minded to unlimited Jewish immigration, and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle just quoted...No British officers, consulted by the Commissioners, believed that the Zionist program could be carried out except by force of arms.The officers generally thought that a force of not less than fifty thousand soldiers would be required even to initiate the program. That of itself is evidence of a strong sense of the injustice of the Zionist program...The initial claim, often submitted by Zionist representatives, that they have a 'right' to Palestine based on occupation of two thousand years ago, can barely be seriously considered." Quoted in "The Israel-Arab Reader" ed. Laquer and Rubin.
Side by side
"Zionist land policy was incorporated in the Constitution of the Jewish Agency for Palestine...'land is to be acquired as Jewish property and...the title to the lands acquired is to be taken in the name of the Jewish National Fund, to the end that the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.' The provision goes to stipulate that 'the Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labor'...The effect of this Zionist colonization policy on the Arabs was that land acquired by Jews became extra-territorialized. It ceased to be land from which the Arabs could ever hope to gain any advantage...
"The Zionists made no secret of their intentions, for as early as 1921, Dr. Eder, a member of the Zionist Commission, boldly told the Court of Inquiry, 'there can be only one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish preponderance as soon as the numbers of the race are sufficiently increased.' He then asked that only Jews should be allowed to bear arms." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
Given Arab opposition to them, did the Zionists support steps towards majority rule in Palestine?
"Clearly, the last thing the Zionists really wanted was that all the inhabitants of Palestine should have an equal say in running the country...[Chaim] Weizmann had impressed on Churchill that representative government would have spelled the end of the [Jewish] National Home in Palestine...[Churchill declared,] 'The present form of government will continue for many years. Step by step we shall develop representative institutions leading to full self-government, but our children's children will have passed away before that is accomplished.'" David Hirst, "The Gun and the Olive Branch."
Denial of the Arabs' right to self-determination
"Even if nobody lost their land, the [Zionist] program was unjust in principle because it denied majority political rights...Zionism, in principle, could not allow the natives to exercise their political rights because it would mean the end of the Zionist enterprise." Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, "Original Sins."
Arab resistance to Pre-Israeli Zionism
"In 1936-9, the Palestinian Arabs attempted a nationalist revolt...David Ben-Gurion, eminently a realist, recognized its nature. In internal discussion, he noted that 'in our political argument abroad, we minimize Arab opposition to us,' but he urged, 'let us not ignore the truth among ourselves.' The truth was that 'politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves...The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country, while we are still outside'...The revolt was crushed by the British, with considerable brutality." Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle."
Gandhi on the Palestine conflict—1938
"Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French...What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct...If they [the Jews] must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs...As it is, they are co-sharers with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them. I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regard as an unacceptable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds." Mahatma Gandhi, quoted in "A Land of Two Peoples" ed. Mendes-Flohr.
Didn't the Zionists legally buy much of the land before Israel was established?
"In 1948, at the moment that Israel declared itself a state, it legally owned a little more than 6 percent of the land of Palestine...After 1940, when the mandatory authority restricted Jewish land ownership to specific zones inside Palestine, there continued to be illegal buying (and selling) within the 65 percent of the total area restricted to Arabs.
Thus when the partition plan was announced in 1947 it included land held illegally by Jews, which was incorporated as a fait accompli inside the borders of the Jewish state. And after Israel announced its statehood, an impressive series of laws legally assimilated huge tracts of Arab land (whose proprietors had become refugees, and were pronounced 'absentee landlords' in order to expropriate their lands and prevent their return under any circumstances)." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
Mr Earl, back up your bullshit!
Last edited by DrB0b; 07-05-2007 at 11:10 PM.
An Israeli state already exists, no matter what anybody thinks they're not going to go away. I think the more important question now is how can they co-exist with the Palestinians and the Arab states in the region. I find the fact that Jordan and Egypt have come to some sort of terms with Israel very encouraging. It's a slow and bloody progress but it's still progress.
If a Palestinian state should not exist, what should we do with the palestinians ? Blow them in the air ? Israel is already trying to do it by killing a lot of innocents in Palestine.
Israel has overused his right to have a jewish state through zionism and mass immigration of foreigner jews, among them a lot of soviet jews and others till they are cramped in their country and have to steal parts of the palestinian soil for their colonies populated mostly by extremist jews.
I wonder if any member in this forum would be happy if he was controlled by a foreign force, bombed, without proper right to business, employement and peaceful life ?
And to answer to the OP, YES, a palestinian state should exist.

linkyThe desire of Jews to return to their historical homeland was first expressed during the Babylonian captivity after 597 BCE. This became a universal Jewish theme after the Jewish-Roman wars, which included the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in the year 70 CE, and the exile that followed. The Jewish diaspora and the population that stayed in the the Land of Israel continued to see it as their spiritual home and as the Promised Land; there is no evidence of any interruption of the Jewish presence there for the last three millennia. For generations, the universal theme of the ingathering of the exiles and the re-establishment of the kingdom of Israel carried mostly religious overtones due to the belief that the Jewish people would return to Zion with the coming of the Messiah, i.e., after divine intervention. Throughout centuries, some Jewish leaders proposed or attempted a return, but they were in a minority.

In the 1860's Zionist pioneers began to arrive, and organized a productive society where one previously didn't exist.
linkyTo Herzl and like-minded Jews, the successful colonization of Palestine, the Jewish ancestral homeland, would necessitate the transplanting of western notions of science, technology and town planning to a poorly developed land dotted with gardenless, overcrowded and unsanitary Arab villages, which, from a distance, looked picturesque, as one British observer tartly noted.
The first generation of Zionist pioneers and planners in Palestine imagined a country of bucolic agricultural villages and Jewish peasants. Translating their dream into reality, they established the moshva, whose members farmed their land independently; the kibbutz, a collective settlement; and the moshav, a cooperative farming village. But their conception of town planning in Palestine was not only confined to building rural communities. On April 11, 1909, a band of Jews gathered in the desolate sand dunes north of Jaffa to consecrate Tel Aviv as a European-style garden suburb.
From appearances it would seem that the horrible "jooos" created something from the dusty barren land!

Ottoman Rule
(1517-1917)
Following the Ottoman conquest in 1517, the Land was divided into four districts and attached administratively to the province of Damascus and ruled from Istanbul. At the outset of the Ottoman era, an estimated 1,000 Jewish families lived in the country, mainly in Jerusalem, Nablus (Shechem), Hebron, Gaza, Safad (Tzfat) and the villages of Galilee. The community was comprised of descendants of Jews who had never left the Land as well as immigrants from North Africa and Europe.
Orderly government, until the death (1566) of Sultan Suleiman the Magificent, brought improvements and stimulated Jewish immigration. Some newcomers settled in Jerusalem, but the majority went to Safad where, by mid-16th century, the Jewish population had risen to about 10,000, and the town had become a thriving textile center as well as the focus of intense intellectual activity. During this period, the study of Kabbalah (Jewish mysticism) flourished, and contemporary clarifications of Jewish law, as codified in the Shulhan Arukh, spread throughout the Diaspora from the study houses in Safad.
With a gradual decline in the quality of Ottoman rule, the country was brought to a state of widespread neglect. By the end of the 18th century, much of the land was owned by absentee landlords and leased to impoverished tenant farmers, and taxation was as crippling as it was capricious. The great forests of Galilee and the Carmel mountain range were denuded of trees; swamp and desert encroached on agricultural land.
The 19th century saw medieval backwardness gradually give way to the first signs of progress, with various Western powers jockeyed for position, often through missionary activities. British, French and American scholars launched studies of biblical geography and archeology; Britain, France, Russia, Austria and the United States opened consulates in Jerusalem. Steamships began to ply regular routes between the Land and Europe; postal and telegraphic connections were installed; the first road was built connecting Jerusalem and Jaffa. The Land's rebirth as a crossroads for commerce of three continents was accelerated by the opening of the Suez Canal.
Consequently, the condition of the country's Jews slowly improved, and their numbers increased substantially. By mid-century, overcrowded conditions within the walled city of Jerusalem motivated the Jews to build the first neighborhood outside the walls (1860) and, in the next quarter century, to add seven more, forming the nucleus of the New City. By 1880, Jerusalem had an overall Jewish majority. Land for farming was purchased throughout the country; new rural settlements were set up; and the Hebrew language, long restricted to liturgy and literature, was revived. The stage was being set for the founding of the Zionist movement.
BTW, just to get our thinking right. A Palestinian state does exist, it is just currently occupied by Israel.

^do you have documentation??![]()
^^
For sure.
But it's just a state of mind and likely to always be so until they behave like civilized people...

^I understand. The existence of a Palestinian state depends on how you "feel".![]()
International law and the UN for a starter.
This thread is going nowhere.
The educated majority- Please do not turn this into an anti-American thing. The people arguing against facts and logic are all American of a certain generation. They have been brought up and indoctrinated this way. I know it lends itself to many conspiracy theories, but ultimately generations come and go.
Whether it takes ten years or ten generations is irrelevant in the wider scheme of things. The Palestinians will have back their Palestine, the main question for historical posterity is whether the Interest Group that claim to speak for the Israeli people will eliminate their nation in the process.
But that is Tomorrows history. I am beyond caring anyway.
I will shortly be starting a new thread, dealing with answers not ploblems.

Sabang I'm not sure why you are "beyond caring"?A declaration of a "State of Palestine" (Arabic: دولة فلسطين) was approved on November 15, 1988, by the Palestinian National Council, the legislative body of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). The proclaimed "State of Palestine" is not and has never actually been an independent state, as it has never had sovereignty over any territory in history.
This issue of Palestine/Israel is the heart of all ME issues.
It is also one of the most revealing when confronting the hypocrisy of the so called "peaceful intentions" of the arab/muslim world.
Fair question Early. I am beyond caring because my psyche' can not handle all this unnecessary suffering, this injustice, this refusal to see logic and facts, these entrenched positions everywhere.
I can not talk Logic to people, and neither can anyone else.
I am a Coward who has abandoned the West, and gone to live in Thailand. I only speak as a free Thinker, and I feel the concept of the Nation state has well outlived it's usefulness.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)