We still liked Saddam when he gassed his own people.
We still liked Saddam when he gassed his own people.
Would this be Halabja where yes the american intelligence and the iraqi government suggested that it was iran who carried out the attack.... essentially a chemical attack on their allies in a war with iraq. I rember it at the time.... thinking bullshit. But then has there been a single case where a claim that a beligerant has deliberately gassed their own side in order to accuse their opponent of using chemical weapons has stud up to the test of time.... as sadams and the US intelligence claims about halabja did not.
Teakdoor CSI, TD's best post-reality thinkers
featuring Prattmaster ENT, Prattmaster Dapper and PrattmasterPseudolus
Dedicated to uncovering irrational explanations to every event and heroically
defending them against the onslaught of physics, rational logic and evidence
I know you're joking.
And the Kurds that were gassed were not Saddam's own people as he was an Arab from Tikrit.
Saddam's name was actually Saddam Hussein Al-Tikriti.
And the US provided the parts and had the knowledge of the Iraqis using chems against the Iranians.
Whether it's Iraqis, Iranians or Syrians.
Honestly, who cares?
Did anyone care about the Tsutsi and the (forgot the other African name). Darfur?
History repeats itself in a cycle.
Whether anyone gives a sh*t or not depends on the benefits of any "action."
F*ck the mainstream media is stupid, and so is a large portion of the public.
............
Obama Set for Limited Strike on Syria as British Vote No.
Good thing we got rid of that dumb cowboy Bush, who unilaterally invaded Iraq with like 40 other countries.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)