Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

Now now RP you are way out of line here for having the sheer audacity of having an opinion which differs from Harry's and others ,I mean lets be quite truthful here on TD the first amendment is OK just so long as you or I agree with them

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

Not really, we are talking about the integrity of a women who has put herself forward as the POTUS , and please be aware that I have thus far said nothing whatsoever against Bernie Sanders cos all it will be with Hilarious is old wine in new bottles

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

Do any politicians really ever tell the truth? There are levels of telling a lie and I think Bill showed his colors and got caught when he dropped his trousers in front of an intern. Of course he said he never had "sex.", bur that depends on what definition you use of sex. Hillary does exactly the same whenever she opens her mouth. One just needs to understand at any given time, her words could be at level 1, or at level 99.

Personally, I think both the Clinton's are pathological liars.

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

Do any politicians really ever tell the truth? There are levels of telling a lie and I think Bill showed his colors and got caught when he dropped his trousers in front of an intern. Of course he said he never had "sex.", bur that depends on what definition you use of sex. Hillary does exactly the same whenever she opens her mouth. One just needs to understand at any given time, her words could be at level 1, or at level 99.

Personally, I think both the Clinton's are pathological liars.

Ahh yes Pathological , this is the very word I was looking for , cheers and of course it goes without saying that the usual Hilarious Clinton fans will not comment cos after all they will simply refuse to watch it