Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by MrG

Outed for what? By whom? When?

Try taking the binders off every now and then G. Putting your fingers in your ears and screaming at the top of your lung capacity won't make her any less guilty. Pigs and lipstick come to mind G...

Originally Posted by bsnub

You are an over inflated windbag.

Another valued post bsnub...you must be gargling with man goo these days? I can feel the love oozzzing from your every post. Not like this is a perfect example of your contributions to SC eh? Have you tried facebook to air your socialist rants>they're far more receptive I hear.

Originally Posted by MrG

Outed for what? By whom? When? As usual your own poster boy pasted up the answer to your question.

Lets make one thing clear. The Repubtards control the House, Senate, Have the majority of the SCOTUS and most of the rest of the federal courts. That said if they had one shred of credible evidence of wrong doing they would be like the hounds of hell to raw meat. Obama would be impeached already and HRC would be in Guantanamo bay. The fact is they have nothing. NADA ZIP ZILCH.

What they do have is an alternate reality that is adept at feeding them propaganda. Filling their simple little science denying minds full of absolute nonsense. Welcome to the right wing alternate reality were rational thought does not exist. It is worse than the twilight zone. Way worse.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Standby, it's coming. Think of Watergate w/out a Deep Throat so it's taking a bit longer.

How long have you been saying this? Surely you must have inside information. Just like that promise you made that Mitt was gonna win the election.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I didn't discriminate between Democratic or Republican voters, Harry, I said 'American' voters.

Yes but when you can only choose from one of two, it shouldn't be that fucking difficult.

I mean who in their right minds would vote for Mitt the Twit or the coffin dodger?


Oh.....

People who had the foresight to see the damage Obama would do to The US.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I didn't discriminate between Democratic or Republican voters, Harry, I said 'American' voters.

Yes but when you can only choose from one of two, it shouldn't be that fucking difficult.

I mean who in their right minds would vote for Mitt the Twit or the coffin dodger?


Oh.....

People who had the foresight to see the damage Obama would do to The US.

The damage was already done before Obama even got elected.

Bush wrecked the economy.

Bush started two needless wars and destabilised the Middle East, creating ISIS in the process.

That's why it's incredible that people were dumb enough to want vote for more of the same Republican idiocy and greed.

Do you even study history?

Or do you just get your 'facts' off Fox News like Booners?

^
Re-writing history again Hairy?

Lets have a nice game, a reminder of course, of Who's The Daddy!



Credit to Bill "the bastard" clinton for looking after the spawn of Hitlery's adultery, but she was not so happy seeing the huge mouth like a guppy staring at her, and barely spoke to Chelsea all of her life. Bill likely smacked out on the cocaine he loves so much.


Fuuuckk all you merkins are dumb as fook even contemplating voting for the murdering drug importing war mongering scum.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Lets have a nice game, a reminder of course, of Who's The Daddy!



Credit to Bill "the bastard" clinton for looking after the spawn of Hitlery's adultery, but she was not so happy seeing the huge mouth like a guppy staring at her, and barely spoke to Chelsea all of her life. Bill likely smacked out on the cocaine he loves so much.


Fuuuckk all you merkins are dumb as fook even contemplating voting for the murdering drug importing war mongering scum.

Only the LIV's, pseudo...

You know, it's almost comical the manner in which the TDMA boys here discount every one of HRC's many sordid scandals going back to Whitewater and beyond.

Remind folks who Webster Hubbel was sometime...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

^
Re-writing history again Hairy?

Booners,

I challenge you to prove any of that wrong.

I look forward to your factual response.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I challenge you to prove any of that wrong. I look forward to your factual response.

He can not prove any of it wrong and he knows it.

You know, at the age of 55 this is a bit of a humbling admission. Most American white people of my age band are just plain idiots. Politically & economically speaking, the best hope for America is for my generation to die out. But that is just nature. What an awfully disappointing generation I belong to.

Well, the following could be posted in this here thread or the Liberal Media one as well:

Media Matters Head Admits Their Purpose Is To Defend Hillary Clinton, In Violation Of Non-Profit Status

.

Not even shy about it.

"Media Matters For America founder David Brock admitted Monday that his nonprofit, tax-exempt organization specifically defends Hillary Clinton, a political candidate for office, from Republican criticism.4

Brock’s stunning admission calls into question the nonprofit status of his left-wing media monitoring organization.What do you think?

Brock made the admission in an op-ed defending his group’s association with Sidney Blumenthal, Hillary Clinton’s political adviser and informal Libya consultant.What do you think?

Blumenthal fed Clinton information from Media Matters while advising the former secretary of state in the aftermath of the Benghazi terrorist attack. Blumenthal was serving as a paid Media Matters consultant at the time.1

Blumenthal testified in a closed-door session last week with Rep. Trey Gowdy’s House Select Committee on Benghazi.3

“By refusing to release the transcript, the Republicans want to hide the true nature of the Blumenthal deposition: Their partisan attempt to both chill Blumenthal’s right to freely express his own political views and more broadly to intimidate our organizations — organizations that have led the way in exposing the fraudulence of the Benghazi investigation itself. (Not to mention our role in specifically defending Hillary Clinton from the Republicans’ unfair attacks on the subject),” Brock wrote.What do you think?

Media Matters is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.2

“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office,” according to IRS rules.2

“Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes,” according to the IRS.What do you think?

Blumenthal and Brock have a longstanding relationship dating back to the 1990’s. Blumenthal has been credited with helping bring Brock, formerly a conservative journalist, into the Clinton-world political establishment.What do you think?

Brock did not return a request for comment."

Media Matters Founder: We Defend Hillary Clinton | The Daily Caller

Imagine that!

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

but in terms of who is responsible for the lousy economy today?

Why should I bother showing you the official economic indicators that every vaguely intelligent person already knows? But go ahead- lie thru' your teeth, and thus (maybe) attract the idiot vote for the Party of Stupid. Which means, you lose again.

Hillary Clinton on course to win presidential election, poll says | US news | The Guardian

US elections 2016

Hillary Clinton on course to win presidential election, poll says




NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll finds former secretary of state is first choice in Democratic primary, and that she would go on to defeat Republican opponents





Democratic presidential candidate and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton at a campaign event last week. Photograph: Randall Hill/Reuters Jessica Glenza in New York
@JessicaGlenza

Tuesday 23 June 2015 19.42 BST Last modified on Wednesday 24 June 2015 01.52 BST

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share via Email
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Google+

Shares

3,515

Comments

690



Hillary Clinton is on course to win the Democratic primary and would go on to trounce her Republican opponents, according to a new poll.
The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that the former secretary of state was the first choice for nominee of 75% of her party, with Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders far behind on 15%.
Analysis Clinton v Bush: America is getting the dynastic matchup it said it didn't want


Despite rivals’ protestations, Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush enjoy the support of their own party’s voters. But the other party’s dynasty candidate? Not a chance

Read more



Martin O’Malley, the former Maryland governor, was on 2%, while Lincoln Chafee, the former governor of Rhode Island, polled less than 1%. Former Virginia senator Jim Webb, who has not yet formally declared he is running, was on 4%.
According to the poll, 92% of likely Democratic voters said they could see themselves supporting Clinton.
The poll asked 1,000 likely voters about their opinions on potential presidential candidates, both Republican and Democrat.

Wait. Why are you posting in this quagmire.

Keep your dick out of this dirt Sarge.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Wait. Why are you posting in this quagmire.

Keep your dick out of this dirt Sarge.

Why?

You reckon you are the final judge for what is posted on TD?

Did you graduate from high school, bstub?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

In response to post #1947 and 'Bush wrecked the economy' statement - OK, Dubya didn't have a good record going into his second term but in terms of who is responsible for the lousy economy today?

You got only one person and that's the failed community agitator to blame.

"Didn't have a good record"?

Is that how you describe someone who created the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression?

What do you call Hitler? A "cheeky rascal having a bit of a laugh"?

Charles Manson? A "fun loving hippie"?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Media Matters Head Admits

Funded by George Soros by the way.

Snubble reds me for posting some facts about hitlery "ohhhh you evil old granny" cliiton. Guess his love affair with her is back on again.


Hitlery it a criminal and needs locking up, and yet she will be president ffs. It is so sad but really will be a fitting epitaph for the USA. I would assume the USD will be toilet paper in September when the chinese confirm their 40,000 tonnes of gold and use it to back their currency leaving the americans trying to eat their phoney paper money as they will have fuck all else use for it. Such a shame. No surprise though - saw a recent address to the nation by barry bathboy and he was speaking as if he was a teacher speaking to 5 yr olds. Is the population of the US so retarded now? How have you all let this happen? Waving your flags and believing the 'exceptional" lie that the majority (present company excepted) of the US believe.

Get a rope - hang her, and the bushes, and bathhouse barry, and soros, and kissinger, and all those bastards and reclaim your country before they kick off ww3 to save your poxy dollar.

Originally Posted by sabang

You know, at the age of 55 this is a bit of a humbling admission. Most American white people of my age band are just plain idiots. Politically & economically speaking, the best hope for America is for my generation to die out. But that is just nature. What an awfully disappointing generation I belong to.

Yup. The one after you is even less comforting if thats possible sabang.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Well, the following could be posted in this here thread or the Liberal Media one as well:

Media Matters Head Admits Their Purpose Is To Defend Hillary Clinton, In Violation Of Non-Profit Status

.

Not even shy about it.

"Media Matters For America founder David Brock admitted Monday that his nonprofit, tax-exempt organization specifically defends Hillary Clinton, a political candidate for office, from Republican criticism.4

Brock’s stunning admission calls into question the nonprofit status of his left-wing media monitoring organization.What do you think?

Brock made the admission in an op-ed defending his group’s association with Sidney Blumenthal, Hillary Clinton’s political adviser and informal Libya consultant.What do you think?

Blumenthal fed Clinton information from Media Matters while advising the former secretary of state in the aftermath of the Benghazi terrorist attack. Blumenthal was serving as a paid Media Matters consultant at the time.1

Blumenthal testified in a closed-door session last week with Rep. Trey Gowdy’s House Select Committee on Benghazi.3

“By refusing to release the transcript, the Republicans want to hide the true nature of the Blumenthal deposition: Their partisan attempt to both chill Blumenthal’s right to freely express his own political views and more broadly to intimidate our organizations — organizations that have led the way in exposing the fraudulence of the Benghazi investigation itself. (Not to mention our role in specifically defending Hillary Clinton from the Republicans’ unfair attacks on the subject),” Brock wrote.What do you think?

Media Matters is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.2

“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office,” according to IRS rules.2

“Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes,” according to the IRS.What do you think?

Blumenthal and Brock have a longstanding relationship dating back to the 1990’s. Blumenthal has been credited with helping bring Brock, formerly a conservative journalist, into the Clinton-world political establishment.What do you think?

Brock did not return a request for comment."

Media Matters Founder: We Defend Hillary Clinton | The Daily Caller

Imagine that!

The question you have to ask yourself is whether or not pointing out Republican lies constitutes "directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign".

And the answer, of course, is no.

It's just pointing out Republican lies.

Another piss poor Booners gentle-breeze-in-a-teacup.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I would assume the USD will be toilet paper in September when the chinese confirm their 40,000 tonnes of gold and use it to back their currency leaving the americans trying to eat their phoney paper money as they will have fuck all else use for it.

How much of the US debt to China is payable in dollars? China prefers the political and economic leverage it gives them. No reason why they would deliberately devalue their holdings.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Why did you leave out dividing the US to an unprecedented level not seen since the civil war.

No RPeter, not the truth at all. Just the 'truth' for a minority of aging white men that cannot get over the fact that a half-nigga was elected President of the USA, twice consecutively. You sir, are a bigot.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I didn't discriminate between Democratic or Republican voters, Harry, I said 'American' voters.

Yes but when you can only choose from one of two, it shouldn't be that fucking difficult.

I mean who in their right minds would vote for Mitt the Twit or the coffin dodger?


Oh.....

People who had the foresight to see the damage Obama would do to The US.

The damage was already done before Obama even got elected.

Bush wrecked the economy.

Bush started two needless wars and destabilised the Middle East, creating ISIS in the process.

That's why it's incredible that people were dumb enough to want vote for more of the same Republican idiocy and greed.

Do you even study history?

Or do you just get your 'facts' off Fox News like Booners?

Why did you leave out dividing the US to an unprecedented level not seen since the civil war. Probably causing more to the US than all the things you listed.

Where do you get this shit? You've had a couple of riots in cities where white cops have killed blacks.

They're nothing on the '92 riots (under Bush Sr. - 53 dead). Or the '65 riots for that matter (Johnson - 34 dead, although you could argue racial tension in '65 was nearing its peak).


If there is any racial divide now, it's being stoked up by racist republicans who don't like a black man in the whitehouse, and Fox squealing every day that the police killing unarmed or fleeing blacks "didn't have any choice" or "were innocent". They took a few days off after Charleston, probably hiding in embarrassment, but they started afresh today with a fucking frenzy.

And if you think localised disturbances did more damage to the US than Bush's screw up (millions of Americans lost their homes and many more their jobs) or the wars (cost $2 Trillion and 8,300 US servicemen and womens' lives - ignoring the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Afghani dead), then you are even more deluded than I thought possible.

Try again.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

In response to post #1947 and 'Bush wrecked the economy' statement - OK, Dubya didn't have a good record going into his second term but in terms of who is responsible for the lousy economy today?

You got only one person and that's the failed community agitator to blame.

"Didn't have a good record"?

Is that how you describe someone who created the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression?

What do you call Hitler? A "cheeky rascal having a bit of a laugh"?

Charles Manson? A "fun loving hippie"?

You seem to ignore the fact that democrats were implicit in creating the conditions which led up to the housing collapse.