Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

God, not another "scandal".

No-one with a minimum of one functioning brain cell takes this shit seriously, especially as the "author" is funded by the Koch heads and Mercer (who is backing Cruz).

The silly little Fox News retards are lapping it up.

Pssst, psst. Booners over here.

Only way to ensure Hilliary loses is to give her your full support. Say nice things about her every chance you get. Praise her and criticize the opposition.

Lesson learned from your presidential candidate support history.

If You Keep Doing The Same Thing, Expect The Same Results

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Forget the email server. The latest revelation—that a <snip>

Forget the mail server??!?!!? ALREADY??!

Jeez. Oh well, farewell emailservergate, we hardly knew ya..

Originally Posted by Norton

Lesson learned from your presidential candidate support history.

BM is the Bill Kristol of TD political punditry with a record untainted by success!

Originally Posted by Norton

Lesson learned from your presidential candidate support history.

Chipotlegate! Commies putting strontium and uranium into our burritos. Given special status after making secret donations to the Clintons.

Check this out...

White House defends Hillary: ‘Conservative authors’ can’t be trusted



Asked About Clinton's Failure to Meet Admin Disclosure Rules, WH Blames 'Conservative Authors'

"Merely dismissing this latest scandal because it originated in a book written by a conservative journalist will not make The New York Times story disappear. It should terrify loyal Democrats that, more than 24 hours after this story broke, this their best defense of Clinton’s behavior."

Indeed. Drip, drip, drip...heh

Ahh Hitlery is being thrown to the wolves and is not going to get near the head auctioneer of the American peoples property position. Jeb Bush is off to Bilderberg this year so your president has been selected for you all already.

Must get off to Iran for a holiday this year to see what it is like before it gets reduced to rubble.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Ahh Hitlery is being thrown to the wolves and is not going to get near the head auctioneer of the American peoples property position. Jeb Bush is off to Bilderberg this year so your president has been selected for you all already.

Must get off to Iran for a holiday this year to see what it is like before it gets reduced to rubble.

Heh...Media Matters has gone Code Red over this juicy story. They're freaking out big-time. It's almost as if they have a vested interest in protecting Piano Legs.

"All of those allegations made by author Peter Schweizer in his upcoming book “Clinton Cash” — such as the Clintons’ acceptance of millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States — have sent the folks at Media Matters into berserker mode."



NBC News: NY Times Story "Doesn't Hold Up That Well"

NBC News has conceded that the flimsy anti-Clinton allegations contained in a New York Times report fail to deliver on the hype surrounding them. The Times report was based in part on a chapter from discredited conservative author Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash, and a series of facts surrounding the story's allegations supports NBC's negative conclusion.

http://mediamatters.org/

How do you spell Schadenfreude again?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Schadenfreude

I experienced a great amount of this after for almost two years you bleated on and on about how Obama was going to lose to Mitt only to see you flounce for months after Obama won by a landslide.

Now that is Schadenfreude! I am waiting for the repeat in 2016.

Heh...

“Clinton Scandal Machine Is Cranking Into Overdrive”



“A Clinton is running for president again, and the scandal machine is cranking into overdrive already. It is certainly nothing new trailing the Clintons from their days in Arkansas.”



That sums it up nicely.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I experienced a great amount of this after for almost two years you bleated on and on about how Obama was going to lose to Mitt only to see you flounce for months after Obama won by a landslide.

He's setting himself up for a big bout of depression again. He get's an incredible rush from the blasts from Bullshit Mountain. Chipotlegate, uh huh.

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Again BM: Do you read the things you copy and paste? Your own post says that what you are talking about is rubbish!

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

NBC News: NY Times Story "Doesn't Hold Up That Well"

NBC News has conceded that the flimsy anti-Clinton allegations contained in a New York Times report fail to deliver on the hype surrounding them. The Times report was based in part on a chapter from discredited conservative author Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash, and a series of facts surrounding the story's allegations supports NBC's negative conclusion.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

All of those allegations made by author Peter Schweizer in his upcoming book “Clinton Cash” — such as the Clintons’ acceptance of millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States — have sent the folks at Media Matters into berserker mode.

And if you are going to regurgitate snot word for word from Michelle Malkin's twitter-watch you might have the decency to give credit, she needs the adclick revenue...

A few facts about the author:

He is funded by the Koch heads and the bloke who is bankrolling Ted Cruz's campaign.

His book is being published by Harper Collins. Who are owned by News Corporation. Who also own Fox News.

You have to be a fucking idiot not to connect the dots.

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Again BM: Do you read the things you copy and paste?

It never ends.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Again BM: Do you read the things you copy and paste? Your own post says that what you are talking about is rubbish!

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

NBC News: NY Times Story "Doesn't Hold Up That Well"

NBC News has conceded that the flimsy anti-Clinton allegations contained in a New York Times report fail to deliver on the hype surrounding them. The Times report was based in part on a chapter from discredited conservative author Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash, and a series of facts surrounding the story's allegations supports NBC's negative conclusion.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

All of those allegations made by author Peter Schweizer in his upcoming book “Clinton Cash” — such as the Clintons’ acceptance of millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States — have sent the folks at Media Matters into berserker mode.

And if you are going to regurgitate snot word for word from Michelle Malkin's twitter-watch you might have the decency to give credit, she needs the adclick revenue...

A few facts about the author:

He is funded by the Koch heads and the bloke who is bankrolling Ted Cruz's campaign.

His book is being published by Harper Collins. Who are owned by News Corporation. Who also own Fox News.

You have to be a fucking idiot not to connect the dots.

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

Your Deflect-O-Tron™ is due for an upgrade BM, it is showing its age.

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

Your Deflect-O-Tron™ is due for an upgrade BM, it is showing its age.

Well, let's try that 'Deflect-O-Tron' focused back toward you Libs for a minute.

Did HRC benefit (Clinton Foundation) from Uranium-Gate or not?

That's the question here. Not who the specific author of the book is or if he voted Republican.

BTW, seen this?

Hillary Responds to 'Clinton Cash' -- By Asking for More Cash...

Hillary Responds to 'Clinton Cash' By Asking for More Cash | The Weekly Standard

Liberal Common Cause demands Clinton Foundation audit.

Unraveling: Liberal Common Cause demands Clinton Foundation, Hillary audit | WashingtonExaminer.com

Got some stones on her, eh?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

Your Deflect-O-Tron™ is due for an upgrade BM, it is showing its age.

Well, let's try that 'Deflect-O-Tron' focused back toward you Libs for a minute.

Did HRC benefit (Clinton Foundation) from Uranium-Gate or not?

That's the question here. Not who the specific author of the book is or if he voted Republican.

The answer is no. There is no "Uranium-Gate".

They got money from rich Russians who happened to be doing business with the US (what a fucking surprise).

They got money from all sorts of rich people who do business with the US.

Did they put a word in on their behalf? No doubt.

But what do you think all those Republitard politicians you kiss the arses of do when they get all their lobbying money, you dumb shit?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

They are not allegations you moron. They are statements of fact.

If you care to disprove them, go ahead.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

They are not allegations you moron. They are statements of fact.

If you care to disprove them, go ahead.

If your interested in facts, got one right here for ya:

The Clinton Foundation took millions of dollars while HRC was Sec of State to facilitate what's now known as Uranimum-Gate.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Where's your proof for those salacious allegations, eh? heh

They are not allegations you moron. They are statements of fact.

If you care to disprove them, go ahead.

If your interested in facts, got one right here for ya:

The Clinton Foundation took millions of dollars while HRC was Sec of State to facilitate what's now known as Uranimum-Gate.

What is "Uranimum-Gate"?

And what is "Uranium-Gate"?

There is absolutely no evidence that Clinton could influence 9 separate bodies, including the Canadian government, to approve a completely unremarkable business transaction.

Do you remember when Dubai was trying to buy US ports, Booners, and everyone was opposed to it?

Except its most vigorous supporter, George W. Bush?

And did you ever wonder why he was so keen to get it through?

Ever wonder where the $500 million his presidential library cost came from?

No, because you don't give a shit, it's the same thing and you're just too dumb to realise your own hypocrisy.