Thread: Ouch- This is Gonna be Embarassing

'Naive' as in overestimating their own power and importance, trying to fill the role they assigned themselves after WW2.

^^^USA is the biggest state sponsored terrorist group in the world today, yes, Islamic countries are their target for oil.

Gulf of Thailand has tin and the riubber lives in Malaysia/Burma/Sth Thailand.

West coast of Burma, stretching up through to Assam, India is rich in oil and gas (hydrate fields along the Indo-Sumatran rift where the 2004 tsunami occurred.

The biggest future venture beyond oil is in hydrate fields which exist along continental shelf areas.

British and US competition in keeping the India Ocean hydrate fields for thir use is ket to non interference with the Burmese junta.

Fok the capitalist bastards!!!

^^^Fok this key board, my broken fingers, and cheap spectacles and light bulbs!!

Originally Posted by mad_dog

But funding anti Saddam or anti Ayatollah groups or the Contras or Chilean coupsis terrorism by the US's own definition. If we all agree that America does fund these groups then we must agree that the United States is the biggest sponsor of terror.

Well, Salvador Allende was going to nationalize Anaconda Copper (a multi-national btw) and the 'free world' could not allow that.

Hope you're not going to trot out Che Guevera too...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by mad_dog

But funding anti Saddam or anti Ayatollah groups or the Contras or Chilean coupsis terrorism by the US's own definition. If we all agree that America does fund these groups then we must agree that the United States is the biggest sponsor of terror.

Well, Salvador Allende was going to nationalize Anaconda Copper (a multi-national btw) and the 'free world' could not allow that.

Hope you're not going to trot out Che Guevera too...

Yeh, he popped up recently in a family rap,..told 'em he was a misguided commy misogynist, dey didn't like that! Me an 'awl hippy an' that!

Said he was a murdering Castoite, and my sis in law nearly got me divorced!

^^^^Casoite =Castro -ite

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Well, Salvador Allende was going to nationalize Anaconda Copper (a multi-national btw) and the 'free world' could not allow that.

So, 'terrorism' is a legitimate response, when it suits, or when it is the best or only option?
(Unless others do so, of course, I hasten to add, those are cowards and animals, as we know.)

Originally Posted by stroller

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Well, Salvador Allende was going to nationalize Anaconda Copper (a multi-national btw) and the 'free world' could not allow that.

So, 'terrorism' is a legitimate response, when it suits, or when it is the best or only option?
(Unless others do so, of course, I hasten to add, those are cowards and animals, as we know.)

It wasn't 'terror' that took out Allende but a plain, simple 'coup'. Or, more properly phrased - 'regime change'.

Terrorism is official policy when it furthers the aims of the United States. If a country employs such tactics against us then it's horrible and deserves condemnation. And we wonder why so few people really cried for us on 9-11?

Originally Posted by surasak

Terrorism is official policy when it furthers the aims of the United States. If a country employs such tactics against us then it's horrible and deserves condemnation. And we wonder why so few people really cried for us on 9-11?

OK Rosie or Jane or whatever you call yourself...

And you - Adolf, or Hermann?

9/11 was the biggest mess that Bush et al could have tried.

The forensic evidence concerning that matter points towards the sickest action of USA home policy ever enacted,.....the sacrifice of countless numbers of innocent civilian USA lives in the pursuit of, and an excuse to perpetrate war in the Caspian Basin (the largest known world oil reserve) for monetary advantage for multinational oil conglomerate companies mainly USA based.

Originally Posted by surasak

Terrorism is official policy when it furthers the aims of the United States. If a country employs such tactics against us then it's horrible and deserves condemnation. And we wonder why so few people really cried for us on 9-11?

We cried for you, heaps!!!

We think your president and his mate are SICK!!!

^^^^ About time he left,.....to HELL!

The f**KINg GUBBO!!!!

PS,.....above is WORLD opinion!!

Check it out!

US and its F***IN' bollix is a dyeing enterprise, look at China and India's new deal,...40% of world population now ready to take over, bigger than any o0ther trade system in history!

WAKE UP!!

Above sp, dieing

Well, I've seen 'Loose Change' 3 times now and I remain undecided. The hypothesis is just so monstrous that it beggars belief.
But I cannot get this simple fact out of my head- why, when a B737 hit the Pentagon on 911, were there no impact marks from two 11 tonne engines, and no debris?

BTW, Ent calm down mate. You are morphing.

Originally Posted by sabang

BTW, Ent calm down mate. You are morphing.

Thanks mate, must e the "lum"

Ye're right about the 9/11 observations though mate.

^^^^Must have bread crumbs under my "b" button, ...gets sticky!

Sabang,

Check out some of the raps re. 9/11 on this forum,.....interesting!

I'm in Thailand currently doing forensic research, so can post more later, re. anomalous published "evidences",.......must be a joke!