Thread: Another US Embassy Under Siege

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

Opinion: Benghazi hearing's real target: Clinton in 2016 - CNN.com

You're an idiot Booners. The link is at the end of the piece, dummy.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

Opinion: Benghazi hearing's real target: Clinton in 2016 - CNN.com

You're an idiot Booners. The link is at the end of the piece, dummy.

Afraid you got me there, harry...

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

Opinion: Benghazi hearing's real target: Clinton in 2016 - CNN.com

You're an idiot Booners. The link is at the end of the piece, dummy.

I don't think he's an idiot. I think he's a bitter old man who is genuinely confused... You have my sympathy Booners.

^

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Last edited by TonyBKK : Today at 01:18 PM.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Today, 01:19 PM [at] #925 (permalink)
TonyBKK
Member
[at]
Last Online: Today 02:50 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangkok, the City of Angels!
Posts: 575

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

Opinion: Benghazi hearing's real target: Clinton in 2016 - CNN.com

What you on about Booners?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Today, 01:15 PM [at] #924 (permalink)
Boon Mee
A Poor Widow's Son
[at]

[at]
Last Online: Today 02:48 PM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Banharnburi
Posts: 27,596


^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

the jury's in. They find tony "hotshot" Bkk guilty of editing after the fact, having tried to pass off some shite from CNN as his own

555555555555

Pretty slick there hotshot, you almost got away with it

^
Good work there pseudolus. I was taking Harry's word for it as I can't be arsed to go behind this POS on the sheer amount of Spam he generates.

Certainly mistakes were made and careful examination of this tragedy will help identify the corrective actions necessary to make life safer for our diplomatic corps.

But the partisan circus that has erupted around the death of these four brave men undercuts such efforts.

It does a disservice to our diplomats and to our country.

Scott Lilly at US News

^
That's just swell, Tony!

But...who gave the order to stand down?

Put up or stfu...

The Republicans’ Benghazi Obsession

The Benghazi hearings did not prove anything like an administration cover-up or other hysterical allegations of crimes equal to Watergate that some Republicans, such as Representative Steve King and Senator Lindsey Graham, have alleged. Republicans have held numerous hearings and briefings on Benghazi and are threatening to hold even more. It is a level of interest they did not show during George W. Bush’s administration when there were 64 attacks on American diplomatic targets or in the years they spent cutting back diplomatic security budgets. The real scandal is that serious follow-up on security in Libya is going unaddressed. Congress needs to make sure that State Department budgets for personnel and security improvements are sufficient and that security reforms are put in place as soon as possible.


The New York Times editorial board

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

sheer amount of Spam he generates.

Second only to you. On this forum you are far and away the godfather of spam..

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

^
That's just swell, Tony!

But...who gave the order to stand down?

Put up or stfu...

How about a fact check regarding the claim Jason Chaffetz made that lives could have been saved if rescuers had not been told to stand down.

Chaffetz told Fox News that "we had people that were getting killed, we had people who are willing to risk their lives to go save them and somebody told them to stand down."

But it’s clear from Hicks’ testimony that four Americans "getting killed" in Benghazi were already dead when the decision was made to keep the special forces team in Tripoli. The mortar attack was over. A Defense Department drone watched overhead in Benghazi as Libyan militia members helped Americans get to the airport.

Chaffetz, however, says the team was available to go save "people that were getting killed," calling the order to stand down "sickening and depressing and disgusting." His office clarifies he meant that the team might have prevented additional casualties if attacks had continued — an explanation utterly missing from his national TV appearance. We rate the claim False.

PolitiFact | Jason Chaffetz says Americans ready to save men 'getting killed' in Benghazi were told to stand down

Benghazi-Gate

[I]f the Republican obsession with Benghazi is partly an attempt to render [Clinton] incapable of winning the general election in 2016, the affair won’t do it for them. Or even get close. [...] Clinton... continues to be one of the most-scrutinized people on earth, and, following her time as secretary of state, her reputation remains strong. Even after the attention the right has paid to Benghazi — including demanding she testify to Congress — her approval numbers remain in the 60s.
Stephen Stromberg

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Last edited by TonyBKK : Today at 01:18 PM.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Today, 01:19 PM [at] #925 (permalink)
TonyBKK
Member
[at]
Last Online: Today 02:50 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangkok, the City of Angels!
Posts: 575

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

Opinion: Benghazi hearing's real target: Clinton in 2016 - CNN.com

What you on about Booners?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Today, 01:15 PM [at] #924 (permalink)
Boon Mee
A Poor Widow's Son
[at]

[at]
Last Online: Today 02:48 PM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Banharnburi
Posts: 27,596


^
Not giving credit to your blatant rip offs anymore?

the jury's in. They find tony "hotshot" Bkk guilty of editing after the fact, having tried to pass off some shite from CNN as his own

555555555555

Pretty slick there hotshot, you almost got away with it

I don't know what he edited, but it wasn't edited when I read it.

You blew it there Tony.

Although of course it's just another feeble attempt to distract from the actual discussion.

^ Dunno what they're on about, if I remember correctly, I fixed the font.

Unlike Pseudo, I always identify my quotes.

^
You were caught out flat-footed there hot shot - owned as it were by Pseudo!

Back on topic.

As you can imagine, these Obama people truly believe they are above the Law:

State Dept. May Not Comply with Congressional Subpoena on Benghazi

"Spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters Wednesday that the State Department has not decided if it will comply with a congressional subpoena demanding documents related to the crafting of Benghazi talking points for Susan Rice."

It's Time For Some Tar & Feathers

Interesting article BoonersArticles: The Betrayal of Hillary Clinton

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Interesting article BoonersArticles: The Betrayal of Hillary Clinton

Good find, piwanoi.

Should put to rest the false notion that it was the Republicans (or Aliens) who were at fault for the lack of funding or...something.

The money quote from your source:

Twice the man in charge of security for our diplomats in Libya, Greg Nordstrom, begged the State Department for more security in Benghazi after no less than 48 security "incidents" there, including two bombings.

Washington, however, said no. Hillary Clinton... had her minion Charlene Lamb... tell Nordstrom that State wanted "to normalize operations" in Libya and to "reduce security resources."

^ No probs Booners you should put "American Thinker " on your favourites ,it could prove very much to your purposeAmerican Thinker

Originally Posted by piwanoi

^ No probs Booners you should put "American Thinker " on your favourites ,it could prove very much to your purposeAmerican Thinker

Duly noted in my Bookmarks - cheers!

I daresay Atlas Shrugs and Jihad Watch is already on yer favorites list, but just in case.. And of course the bible, WorldNutDaily.
Actually the lampoon site 'My right wing dad' is probably the best abbreviated way to keep up with the nonsense from the obese armchair warriors of the right.

Originally Posted by sabang

I daresay Atlas Shrugs and Jihad Watch is already on yer favorites, but just in case..
Of course the lampoon site 'My right wing dad' is probably the abbreviated way to keep up with the nonsense from the obese armchair warriors of the right.

Don't have Atlas Shrugs but occasionally check in with Jihad Watch although with all the Islamic Terror events popping up, it's redundant. Don't read "My Right Wing Dad" these days - too much material from...wait for it now...Lamestream Media!

W/regard to your Bookmarks, Media Matters is a most suspect source of objectivity. As well as Moveon.org

Another Fox News lie debunked by Bumpintheroad Booner's favorite site Media Matters.



Fox News suggested that national security adviser Tom Donilon is unfit for his position by accusing him of being missing during the night of terrorist attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya. In fact, congressional testimony showed that Donilon was in contact with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton throughout the night of the attacks.

On May 30, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade stated that "no one seemed to know where [Donilon] was" during the September 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, asking, "Where was he that night?" Kilmeade questioned Donilon's presence despite showing a photo of Donilon attending a briefing of President Obama on the Benghazi attack in the White House that day. On-screen text during the segment asked, "Where was Donilon on night of Benghazi?"

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Media Matters is a most suspect source of objectivity

Ya don't say. I check in sometimes, not that often- it's anti Fox crusade is frankly a bit old.

If you want good stuff from people that don't kowtow to the man, Mother Jones.

OMG- is that the real John Bolton?
I thought he was ignored in polite company.