The integrity of 'facts' become diluted through contradiction by other 'facts', so to summarise these 8k posts everyone had a hand in it and the truth, what actually happened, is buried in there somewhere and blurred by differing views on the same 'facts'.

I can't see a tsunami of 'new' data revealing much that hasn't already been claimed here and elsewhere by one camp and dismissed by another; reckon this new stuff would simply add to existing layers of confusion by fuelling all theories with new 'facts' and coincidences giving more reason for every side to dig in.

Fex, the moon landing, which is easiest to resolve since it either happened or it didn't, with no other elements adding confusion; if it did happen then everything is as history records, and if not then all players are culpable. Yet for a half century neither side has been able to force the other into surrender by irrefutable 'facts' proving their version as the truth. Can't be done.

Eventually we'll just have to accept that some standoffs are on the JFK level, too deep and with too many elements for any version to be accepted as incontrovertible and definitive truth.