Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Conveniently ignoring the two 3300kg Roll Royce engines attached to these hollow aluminum wings I see.

If the facts get in the way of your opinion, just ignore them. I'm guessing you're not a retired scientist.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by Latindancer

In terms of physics, it's similar, and almost the miniature equivalent of Albert's hole in Pentagon photo. Same principles at work.

Your hole was made, I assume, by a projectile that was round in shape, the same as a bullet? Or a may be a cruise missile? Whereas the hole in Alberts picture is supposed to depict a projectile with a wing span of nearly 60m have crashed in to it. There's a big difference.

Yes, hollow aluminum wings dangling on the outer edges of an airplane that have virtually no resistance to an impact such as this, simply mind boggling the ignorance displayed by the skeptics in this thread..