Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 37 of 37
  1. #26
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly View Post
    DrB, not all distro are the same, the kernel is common, but the utils around can vary greatly. Between libs, compilers etc... you really have different compatibility and scability issues and really different OS.
    I just use standard GNU utilities for production systems, gcc, gawk, glibc and so on. I know what I want from a system and make sure that that's what I get when I install. My home system is a home-brew hodge-podge because I'm always messing around with it but production systems are a different matter and normally, if the customer is willing to pay for it, I'll use AIX and the appropriate (expensive) hardware. If they're not willing to pay I'll use whatever seems best for the project. If it's linux I'll generally use Debian but if I've got to install a whole bunch of machines at the same time I'll do a Ubuntu nfs/netboot-install. Ubuntu, installed with the server option rather than the desktop option is pretty much the same as a minimal Debian install but has better initial hardware support. My only concern is that the OS do what I need it to do and other than that I have no deeply held likes or dislikes for particular distros. I don't use slackware because updates are too infrequent. I used to use it a lot but it's now dropped way down in my list of choices. I've been using Unix for nearly 25 years and I still think the best ever version was Irix.
    Right now I've got Solaris, Debian-64(Itanium), Debian, Ubuntu, Centos and RH Enterprise, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, AIX, and Windows in my data centre, that's too many but I have to pick whichever one is best for the servers purposes or hardware and the customers or my needs.
    Last edited by DrB0b; 11-07-2007 at 10:05 AM.

  2. #27
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    AIX is like a bad wife, can't believe you would go with such a poorly designed Unix on a Production system. Of course smit is not helping

    DigitalUNIX used to be the shit

  3. #28
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly View Post
    AIX is like a bad wife, can't believe you would go with such a poorly designed Unix on a Production system. Of course smit is not helping
    Works great with Oracle, horses for courses, 5L is pretty good though I don't think I've heard anybody ever say they like AIX. I never use smit, I loathe it! I once worked at British Telecom, they used Digital Unix for their billing system, one day we decided to do a scan of the systems to check for ports that shouldn't be open. Scan started, every Digital Unix system crashed within 10 seconds! Red faces at Digital but they did release a patch to fix the problem within two days and sent us a bunch of teeshirts for letting them know there was a problem I liked Digital, TOPS-10 (Free TOPS-10 Login Accounts) was the OS I cut my teeth on, fantastic OS and well ahead of its time, shame that Digital's disappeared into the bowels of HP.
    Last edited by DrB0b; 11-07-2007 at 10:44 AM.

  4. #29
    Thailand Expat lom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on my way
    Posts
    11,453
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    I liked Digital, TOPS-10
    The very first OS I hacked my way into using a home made 300Baud acoustic coupler
    Gave away way too much system info before you were logged in..

  5. #30
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    29-02-2012 @ 08:44 PM
    Posts
    3,539
    Arch Linux is worst a try for those who like a clean GNU/Linux distro.
    Arch Linux, a lightweight and flexible linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple. Currently we have official packages optimized for the i686 and x86-64 architectures.
    In the case you want to install it just download the ftp or base ISO. Current is useless coz as soon as you have finished the install you can update all packages with the simple "pacman -Syu" command.

    I like this distro because after the install you have just a running OS without X and graphcal environnement, and then pick-up the graphical environnement you like and install apps you need. Nothing more than what you need.


    OOps, I forgot to add this:
    Arch Linux is optimized for the i686 processor and therefore will not
    run on any lower or incompatible generations of x86 CPUs
    (i386,i486,i586). A Pentium II or AMD K6-2 processor or higher is
    required.
    Last edited by Wallalai; 11-07-2007 at 07:03 PM.

  6. #31
    Northern Hermit
    friscofrankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiangmai, Thailand
    Posts
    7,526
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    Frankie, If you want to set your system to boot to runlevel 2, non-graphical, edit /etc/inittab if your system has it or if not disable booting to X in the /etc/rc* files. As far as I remember SUSE does have /etc/inittab, look for the entry that says; id:3:initdefault:
    Yeah Bob, I know I am doing a bit of testing as I run through several Distros. The Init on SuSE was easy enough to muddle through thanks I started this thread not for geeks to compare dicks (OSs) but to maybe convince a few people that there are alternatives. I don;t have the time or I would have test a few more distros full on default installs, BTW yes Gentoo had an expert install and it would die, die, die when there was an error no error report, no nothing just a nice blinking cursor at the prompt waitng for you to try again This was while manually setting disk partitions. In fact the thing would crash on just about any of the "Advanced" install features. It is very amateurish installation with very professional looking graphics (that shoulda been a warning)

    I am convinced anyone that has installed windows on theri own can use the SuSE distro abd be upin running in the same amount of time with the same minimal savvy.There is nothing wrong with a default, graphic install (if it works) for the normal desktop user. Just afer installing I downloaded and iso image, put in a blank dvd Kb3 popped up burned the dvd in minutes. Very much llike windows as far as ease of use and end-user friendly.

    No way SuSE would have been a slam dunk or even time effecient by cicumventing the default install All distros are NOT the same.

    Some make unpacking and manually building the system all but impossible. Packages, modules packed with the distro, install routines, missing or optional BASIC COMMAND LINE UTILITES, Availability of drivers on the DVD /CD set, distro specific Kernel modifications. SuSE is a very nice desktop distro installs cleanly minimal command line utils are included The gcc compiler has been altered. lenty of differences.

    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    I know what I want from a system and make sure that that's what I get when I install. My home system is a home-brew hodge-podge because I'm always messing around with it but production systems are a different matter.
    Me too my systems was completely hand built by me over the course of several months it ran without a hitch for two plus years. I am now in the position where I need to get to work on a project and find a couple of nasty bugs in my previous project NOW.

    I've got slack going back on the old machine as i write this. I have cleaned out SuSE and am compiling apache, MySQL, PHP just so I can get going.

    I was completely down. I tried two quick and dirty installs. SuSE went in like a greased goose. I have already been able to start work while addng the stuff I'll need for testing... I'm going to work on this install, debug the code finish up a design get it submitted by that time I'll have the old machine back.

    I can then take he time to assemble a very decent hand-rolled *nix system. It won;t be SuSE or Slack, I'm thinking FreeBSD looks pretty good, but I search a few others. Nvidia has good docs and drivers for the chipset, with sources, so I'm good to go there. the BSD platform and has been in the forefront of 64-bit computing. it's looking batter and better and it was my first personal *nix box back when You downloaded an install diskette image and installed over a dialup line I can get up and runing in a minimum of time in text mode and add the stuff I want from source as I go.
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty -- T. Jefferson


  7. #32
    Northern Hermit
    friscofrankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiangmai, Thailand
    Posts
    7,526
    After a few days of SuSE 10.2 I am convincved more 7 more this is a very good alternative to Microshit's Windoze. The install went smooth (I have issues with sit down, shut and watch installs but this one came out OK) the installation of new packages is OK. Things to watch out for mp3 support. Most SuSE supplied packages do not support it Juk (a mp3 player) does but on installing Xine (video player) ALL multimedia support for mp3 went out the window, in all apps!

    Easy? I think so. In the default config you have access to the utilities to change the system and directory structure these ustils prompt for the root password. By logging in as a normal user and only authenticating as needed you are protecting yourself.
    From yourself. Everything is polished and just as fuckin slick as Microsoft ever dreamed it could be. The main admin util is Yast, it's on the menu use it. There is a configure menu that allows you to install system software. Another nice thing about linux you can install anything you want into your home dire and use it. No need to register with the system. any user can do this unless you make the effort to lock that out. Won;t go into that here plenty of docs on the net.

    By default the KDE window manager is loaded, I had to edit the inittab file (as Dr B. mentioned above) to get to a fuckin prompt but most of you won't want that, Imean you;re looking for a replacement to windows not DOS, right?

    Installing software is a snap, unless you can;t find a package. For most of you everything you need is out there. SuSE uses a variant of the RedHat RPM package manager (replaced by Yum [no fucking kidding!] in Fedora core 7). You'll have a few repositories registered, you should disable all of them (opinion). There are better package repositories than the default CD or OpenSuSE.org repos.

    By going into Yast and selecting Software, then "Installation Source" you will get a list click on each click edit then disable. When you;ve done that you want to "Add." Click the "FTP" radio button, then "Next" enter 'mirrors.kernel.org' as the server (leave the quotes off) and '/opensuse/distribution/10.2/repo/oss/suse/' for the directory on server. Leave anonymous checked. Click "Next." It willprobe the source coma back with some kind of message and you should be able to click "Finish." Now you have access to Open Source Software not limited by SuSE/Novell's Idea of what is legal/good for you.

    After getting a few things worked out (like a good mp3 player) I was able to debug my 99% finished project and work on some design for the next one. I had a few minutes so I installed Windows XP Pro & Slackware on my old machine. The Wondoze install was uneventful, the ol' lady can now read email and play on-line games to her heart's content.

    Fuck me, I love Slackware. Booted the DVD, asked for "Boot Parameters" (all installs do) I just hit enter. The system came up I logged in a 'root' (No password) and was informed, ":You may now partition your hard drive (if needed) and run setup."

    Mother-fuckin sweet. I used the menu-driven cfdisk and had the partition schema I wanted in a minutes. Now you can manually run the mkfs utility, or let setup run it for you. Remember dos? Remember how uncomplicated the installs were? I typed "setup" and hit enter. 20 minute later I had a fully functional OS with X-windows properly configured and ready to go (yes, it boots to a command prompt). There were many questions about my system I accepted either defaults or recommended settings throughout, the only thing I had to know was the horizontal & vertical refresh rate of my monitor, DO NOT fuck this up! You can toast your monitor if you over-closk it, most LCDs will tell you you have an invalid setting CRTs will die, dramatically. your monitor's owner's manual will have these figures if you don't have it get on the net an get them from the manufacturer's site.

    Slackware does not have a package manager to speak of. It is not a idiot proof system. I hate to be the one to tell you but there is no such thing. Windoze has set the bar by lying to you and telling you it exisits, like Sanny klause, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy these are all fuckin lies. Slackware is not for everyone. But the init file setup is much simpler and direct, BUT not completely linux spec compliant!

    most of the major distros (Mandrake, Fedora, SuSe Gentoo, Debian) are as easy as Windoze, if not easier. The applications available for FREE will blow your mind. There is no big brother inspecting your computer, there are very few script kiddies writing macro viruses and as long as you keep Samba disabled you have much a less exploitable system. There are full-on graphical utilities to install, manage and configure services, software and users. You won't be any more lost that you would be in Windoze. AND you won't be trying to fly under anyone's radar.

    LOSE MICROSOFT Godammit!! The Open Source systems out there are as good as (I submit better) WinDoze. They even read MS format files Open office saves in all MS formats as well as Open Document compliant formats.

    I've got a new 19 inch monitor on my new system the old 17 incher on the old one, with my two machines networked enough to exchange files and will be moving back to my old, 32-bit system and setting up the new one with some 64-bit distros. I will try a few desktop oriented distros (back to Gentoo, then Debian, Mandrivia maybe Ubuntu [consider ubuntu a half-distro but capable of great things]) Ultimately I'll either go to a BSD install or a roll-your-own Linux From Scratch install I may lose a few of you on some of the more technical shit, Fuck it let it go. I hope to have a very good idea the major distros.

    I've been a systems architect/engineer for a good few years. My policy with a new a OS or software package has always been "dummy mode = on, first." This means stick in the CD/DVD and fuckin install it, don;t read no goddam documents except the README file, go from there. This is "hacking" you beat it,break it, read about it, then; fix it, modify it; you make it work. This is the only way to learn the pitfalls & how to avoid them.
    Then when doing an install or setup for production you want to know what needs attention, what to tell your techs and engineers when they go out to make things work over-night.

    Hopefully, I'll be able to make some more astute recommendations/warnings over the next few weeks. I won't try to get you ready to cluster 36 machines to crunch seti-like data or crawl the net, but how to Lose Microsoft as painlessly as possible.

  8. #33
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    I will need to get SUSE desktop a new try again, I remember seeing Novel (or Corel) doing a nice job with another distro for their Windows desktop, all based on Linux.

    Slackware is definitely the best ones for geeks who like some kind of control of what they do. Harder to upgrade and maintain, but much more flexible than the rest of them.

    Slackware used to be very popular when Linux started, now it's being ignored
    Last edited by Butterfly; 16-07-2007 at 09:57 AM.

  9. #34
    Northern Hermit
    friscofrankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiangmai, Thailand
    Posts
    7,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly
    I will need to get SUSE desktop a new try again, I remember seeing Novel (or Corel) doing a nice job with another distro for their Windows desktop, all based on Linux.
    SuSE is Novell's Distro.
    I remember Corel had a Linux a few years ago, wondered what happened to it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia
    Corel Linux, also called Corel LinuxOS, was a Debian-based Linux distribution made by Corel that was released in late 1999. Corel later discontinued the distribution, but did not remove the former Corel Open Source Development website until March 2002.
    Corel did not use the standard KDE file manager. It instead used its own file manager, CFM. This, along with other modifications Corel made, meant that Corel Linux suffered at being incompatible with other versions of Linux much more so than other competitors in the industry. At a time when there was relatively little Linux software available, this was a serious hurdle for Corel and its users.
    Corel LinuxOS Second Edition was released in download, regular and deluxe editions, the latter of which bundled Corel WordPerfect Office for Linux.
    Xandros purchased the Corel Linux source code and development team when Corel scrapped its Linux business in August 2001. However, the Corel Corporation is a stockholder of Xandros
    And now I know.



    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly
    Slackware used to be very popular when Linux started, now it's being ignored
    I downloaded slack 11 the other day, about a week later Slack 12 was released. It is still being developed but there is no 64 it version. Slack is Ideal for folks that want a basic linux to add to, not a super desktop they need to remove garbage from. Software Installs mostly require compiling source working out the dependencies on your own. Many applications will require you to download several lib packs and compile them before you can compile the target app. It's not for everyone getting a software package you want to test on your machine can require several hours many people do not want to spend.

  10. #35
    たのむよ。
    The Gentleman Scamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    02-07-2021 @ 10:09 PM
    Location
    51.5491° N, 0.1441° W
    Posts
    9,779
    Once you get a Mac you never go back.

  11. #36
    Northern Hermit
    friscofrankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiangmai, Thailand
    Posts
    7,526
    Quote Originally Posted by The Gentleman Scamp
    Once you get a Mac you never go back.
    have had tons of Macs And I will never go back, to Mac.

  12. #37
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    ^ well spoken.

    Macs are for computer pussies

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •