This is a tough one, I would imagine that McDonalds is slightly more healthier as it contains more salt which the body needs - then again I don't know for sure.
I have not tried eating my faeces though I find it equally as appealling as a McDonalds and it's usually warmer too.
After consuming a McDonalds I never feel full, and I feel like I have done my body a dis-service similar to the feeling I get after smoking a cigarette but in a different way. I feel my body saying to me, 'I'll keep it down this time but don't do that again please'.
The avarage McDonalds meal costs three times that of a good healthy Thai dish, and it's huge sucess in Thailand is down to it's marketing campaign which is perfectly suited to Thai marketing in that it is witless, simple, patronising, lacks any imagination originality or style and relies mainly on an insipid plastic smile on a silly white face.
Like tabacco lobbyists and the government ghosts behind 9/11 - they will continue to get away with feeding us shit because we are too busy complaining about it to actually do anything about it.
The Thai's don't complain of course, it's western, Ronald has a white face and the food is sickly sweet and salty.
However - the poo question is valid enough to justify this thread and also a poll, I genuinly believe there is very little difference.


Reply With Quote

