Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 117
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    DrAndy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    25-03-2014 @ 05:29 PM
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    32,025

    Female Genital Cutting

    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    I wonder if Satu, Dua, Tiga would have the same effect.
    I had a kitty called "tigga"

    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin
    I don't have any suggestions for kitty names, but I believe your Missus' lips are delightful
    yes, they look nice

    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    very full lips as opposed to almost no lips.
    Do Muslim women still practice circumcision in Indon? I went out with a girl who had her lips reduced

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    Quote Originally Posted by The Fresh Prince
    I think we need another thread on Mrs KW. It will of course need a lot more pics.
    oh geez, that could get me in a world of trouble.



    Quote Originally Posted by DrAndy
    Do Muslim women still practice circumcision in Indon?
    yes, but its not the same as the African version, in fact MrsKW was circumcised, but only ceremonial, no cutting occurred, though they do call it 'cutting'

  3. #3
    Sprayed On Member
    The Fresh Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Not in the willage
    Posts
    11,683
    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    MrsKW was circumcised,
    I understand she had no 'cutting' but when they do cut, what do the cut?

    I hope your not gonna say "Chop their flaps off"

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    we could probably do another thread on this, I recall reading about it awhile back, there is 4 types of female circumcision.

    1. the whole horrible thing mainly prevalent in subSaharan africa where they do cut all of it off (lips and clitoris) and sew it back up.

    2. the lips are trimmed slightly.

    3. ?? cannot remember.

    4. ceremonial cut or knife is just touched to the clitoris but no lasting damage is done.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    ^ not 100% correct, I just checked wikipedia.

    World Health Organization categorization

    The WHO uses the term Female Genital Mutilation, and classifies FGM into four major types[22] (see Diagram 1), although there is some debate as to whether all common forms of FGM fit into these four categories, as well as issues with the reliability of reported data.[23]

    Diagram 1:This image shows the different types of FGM and how they differ to the uncircumcised female anatomy.



    [edit] Type I

    The WHO defines Type I FGM as the partial or total removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy) and/or the prepuce (clitoral hood); see Diagram 1B. When it is important to distinguish between the variations of Type I mutilation, the following subdivisions are proposed: Type Ia, removal of the clitoral hood or prepuce only; Type Ib, removal of the clitoris with the prepuce.[22] In the context of women who seek out labiaplasty, Stern opposes removal of the clitoral hood and points to potential scarring and nerve damage.[24]

    [edit] Type II

    The WHO's definition of Type II FGM is "partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora (excision). When it is important to distinguish between the major variations that have been documented, the following subdivisions are proposed: Type IIa, removal of the labia minora only; Type IIb, partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora; Type IIc, partial or total removal of the clitoris, the labia minora and the labia majora. Note also that, in French, the term ‘excision’ is often used as a general term covering all types of female genital mutilation.[22]

    [edit] Type III: Infibulation with excision

    The WHO defines Type III FGM as narrowing of the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and repositioning the labia minora and/or the labia majora, with or without excision of the clitoris (infibulation)."[1] It is the most extensive form of FGM, and accounts for about 10% of all FGM procedures described from Africa.[25] Infibulation is also known as "pharaonic circumcision."[26]
    In a study of infibulation in the Horn of Africa, Pieters observed that the procedure involves extensive tissue removal of the external genitalia, including all of the labia minora and the inside of the labia majora. The labia majora are then held together using thorns or stitching. In some cases the girl's legs have been tied together for two to six weeks, to prevent her from moving and to allow the healing of the two sides of the vulva. Nothing remains but the walls of flesh from the pubis down to the anus, with the exception of an opening at the inferior portion of the vulva to allow urine and menstrual blood to pass through; see Diagram 1D. Generally, a practitioner recognized as having the necessary skill carries out this procedure, and a local anesthetic is used. However, when carried out "in the bush," infibulation is often performed by an elderly matron or midwife of the village, with no anesthesia used.[27]
    A reverse infibulation can be performed to allow for sexual intercourse or when undergoing labor, or by female relatives, whose responsibility it is to inspect the wound every few weeks and open it some more if necessary. During childbirth, the enlargement is too small to allow vaginal delivery, and so the infibulation is opened completely and may be restored after delivery. Again, the legs are sometimes tied together to allow the wound to heal. When childbirth takes place in a hospital, the surgeons may preserve the infibulation by enlarging the vagina with deep episiotomies. Afterwards, the patient may insist that her vulva be closed again.[27]
    Women who have been infibulated face a lot of difficulty in delivering children, especially if the infibulation is not undone before hand, which often results in severe tearing of the infibulated area, or fetal death if the birth canal is not cleared (Toubia, 1995). The risk of severe physical, and psychological complications is more highly associated with women who have under gone infibulations as opposed to one of the lesser forms of FGM. Although there is little research on the psychological side effects of FGM, many women feel great pressure to conform to the norms set out by their community, and suffer from anxiety and depression as a result (Toubia, 1995). “There is also a higher rate of post traumatic stress disorder in circumcised females” (Nicoletti, 2007, p. 2). [28] [29]
    This practice increases the occurrence of medical complications due to a lack of modern medicine and surgical practices.[citation needed]
    A five-year study of 300 women and 100 men in Sudan found that "sexual desire, pleasure, and orgasm are experienced by the majority of women who have been subjected to this extreme sexual mutilation, in spite of their being culturally bound to hide these experiences."[30]
    Most advocates of the practice continue to perform the procedure in adherence to standards of beauty that are very different from those in the west. Many infibulated women will contend that the pleasure their partners receive due to this procedure is a definitive part of a successful marriage and enjoyable sex life.[citation needed]

    [edit] Type IV: Other types

    There are other forms of FGM, collectively referred to as Type IV, that may not involve tissue removal. The WHO defines Type IV FGM as "all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, for example, pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization."[22] This includes a diverse range of practices, such as pricking the clitoris with needles, burning or scarring the genitals as well as ripping or tearing of the vagina.[22]

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    Asia

    Indonesia (No national prevalence figures avail., Type I and IV)Officials are preparing to release a decree banning doctors and paramedics from performing FGC. Azrul Azwar, the director general of community health, stated that, "All government health facilities will also be instructed to spread information about the decision as well as the redundancy of female circumcision."[92]

  7. #7
    Part time poster
    slimboyfat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Online
    24-06-2025 @ 11:29 AM
    Location
    BANGKOK / Kanchanaburi
    Posts
    9,444
    It sounds interesting. A hobby for the man who has grown out of wood carving

  8. #8
    I am in Jail
    Lily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    14-05-2014 @ 05:06 PM
    Posts
    6,815
    Sick.

  9. #9
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    I don't get angry about many things, but this I do. You blokes think it's funny, then line up to have your dicks cut off.

  10. #10
    Not an expat
    Fabian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    04-09-2017 @ 09:31 PM
    Location
    Hamburg, cold dark Germany
    Posts
    5,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon View Post
    You blokes think it's funny, then line up to have your dicks cut off.
    I think KW almost got his chopped off.

  11. #11
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon View Post
    I don't get angry about many things, but this I do. You blokes think it's funny, then line up to have your dicks cut off.
    Ah, but 1/5th of all men worldwide do have their foreskin circumcised... This the purpose of the mohel... Seems like you ladies have been getting off light for centuries...

    Circumcision

  12. #12
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Lily
    Sick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon
    I don't get angry about many things, but this I do. You blokes think it's funny, then line up to have your dicks cut off.
    Agree one million percent.

    Not in the least bit funny.

    Just horrible. Words fail me.

  13. #13
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    Ah, but 1/5th of all men worldwide do have their foreskin circumcised... This the purpose of the mohel... Seems like you ladies have been getting off light for centuries... Circumcision
    Really, you think it's the same thing? Seriously?

  14. #14
    On a walkabout Loy Toy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,557
    I decided not to look at this thread before because I think the custom is the most diabolical, savage and heinous ritual know to man.

    When I noticed that the ladies had posted their replies I thought it was OK now to have a look.

    Mutilation of a female's genitals has a very high mortality rate as well which is horrifying.

    Outlaw this pratice and outlaw it now! Fook their barbaric religion and beliefs!

  15. #15
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Loy Toy
    Mutilation of a female's genitals has a very high mortality rate as well which is horrifying.
    Quite right, LT. Maybe we should introduce the fact that very often the wound is not stitched together but thorns are inserted to hold the wound. The infection rate is horrendously high, scarring is both ugly and painful and, as LT says, many girls don't survive.

    Excellent post, LT. Greened.

  16. #16
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    Quote Originally Posted by November Rain
    Quite right, LT. Maybe we should introduce the fact that very often the wound is not stitched together but thorns are inserted to hold the wound. The infection rate is horrendously high, scarring is both ugly and painful and, as LT says, many girls don't survive.
    for the first type.

    Can I remind you of type IV?

    Is there anything wrong with this one?

    (of course I agree that the other types are barbaric and should be stopped)

  17. #17
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    Can I remind you of type IV? Is there anything wrong with this one?
    Yes, this quote including the highlighted word



    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    4. ceremonial cut or knife is just touched to the clitoris but no lasting damage is done. __________________
    I'm presuming you wanted a comment on the above, because the actual type IV is horrific.
    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    [edit] Type IV: Other types There are other forms of FGM, collectively referred to as Type IV, that may not involve tissue removal. The WHO defines Type IV FGM as "all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, for example, pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization."[22] This includes a diverse range of practices, such as pricking the clitoris with needles, burning or scarring the genitals as well as ripping or tearing of the vagina.[22

  18. #18
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    59,983
    OK, you're right, anything that cause pain or some sort of wound is wrong,

    what I meant, and perhaps you missed my post from before, was what about the versions that MrsKW has experienced, and seems to be very common in Indonesia....

    ceremonial cutting, where NO actual cutting takes place?

  19. #19
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Quote Originally Posted by November Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    Ah, but 1/5th of all men worldwide do have their foreskin circumcised... This the purpose of the mohel... Seems like you ladies have been getting off light for centuries... Circumcision
    Really, you think it's the same thing? Seriously?
    Well, if you have a penis and had the tip of it cut off during circumcision, I would have to say yes, pretty much the same outcome... The only difference would be the type of female circumcision where the woman's clitoris was removed... Now that's downright wrong...
    Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

  20. #20
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    Well, if you have a penis and had the tip of it cut off during circumcision, I would have to say yes, pretty much the same outcome..
    The foreskin is removed in male circumcision. Not the tip of the penis.

  21. #21
    Whopping Member
    benbaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    28-09-2024 @ 08:52 AM
    Location
    In the comfy chair
    Posts
    5,549
    Quote Originally Posted by November Rain
    male circumcision
    Does anyone mind if we call it male genital mutilation? I've always thought the male version was also barbaric, unless done for sound medical reasons.

  22. #22
    The cold, wet one
    November Rain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    31-03-2015 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    12,202
    Quote Originally Posted by benbaaa
    Does anyone mind if we call it male genital mutilation? I've always thought the male version was also barbaric, unless done for sound medical reasons.
    Actually, I agree, as you'll see by my comments on the relevant thread of a few weeks ago. Unless medically necessary, I'd never subject anyone to it.

  23. #23

    R.I.P.


    dirtydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Pattaya Jomtien
    Posts
    58,763
    Could this thread be merged with this one slagdogs (==Meeting girls online==), it might stop some of these girls being so enthusiastic about shagging wrinkly old men

  24. #24
    Thailand Expat Texpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    13,058
    You're ascribing human characteristics to barbaric savages.

    We really need to be more tolerant here.

    Shouldn't we just mind our own business?

  25. #25
    Thailand Expat
    chassamui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bali
    Posts
    11,678
    Get the fuck out of here. This is absolutely the most appalling, disgusting and pointless, unecessary torture. The people who continue this heathen, barbaric practice are simply inhuman. How can anyone subject another human being to this kind of depraved punishment.
    I am all for live and let live, particularly where religious beliefs are concerned, but this serves no purpose other than undue suffering and the infliction of pain to satisfy some archaic and ridiculous ritual.
    Those who perpetuate this kind of suffering should be rounded up and cut to pieces, with a blunt pen knife.
    I am lost for words now. It's just not right.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •