Proof that some people are dumb enough to believe that man has been on the moon

**dirtydog** · 23-09-2008, 07:43 PM

fake moon landing

ACTUAL PROOF THAT THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKED!

**pai nai ma** · 23-09-2008, 07:46 PM

cue cmn ....

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 07:49 PM

I am content in my belief.

the proof is legion.

no need to justify myself a la kerux.

**pai nai ma** · 23-09-2008, 07:51 PM

what took you 3 minutes?

**buriramboy** · 23-09-2008, 07:51 PM

I've never believed that man set foot on the moon back in 1969, i mean people didn't even have microwaves and dishwashers back then, yet they had the technology to go to the moon and back, course they did!!!

Plus the Ruskies were miles ahead of the Americans in terms of space technology and they said at the time it couldn't be done and i agree with them. Oh yeah and also something to do with the Van Allen (spelling) radiation belt, apparantly you'd need a space ship about 20 meters thick built out of lead to pass through it and live to tell the tale.

**barbaro** · 23-09-2008, 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by buriramboy

I've never believed that man set foot on the moon back in 1969, i mean people didn't even have microwaves and dishwashers back then, yet they had the technology to go to the moon and back, course they did!!!

Plus the Ruskies were miles ahead of the Americans in terms of space technology and they said at the time it couldn't be done and i agree with them. Oh yeah and also something to do with the Van Allen (spelling) radiation belt, apparantly you'd need a space ship about 20 meters thick built out of lead to pass through it and live to tell the tale.

I've read about and seen the radiation issue in documentaries.

I too, am skeptical. I am open for any opinions on this both pro and con.

During the Cold War, and after the USSR got Sputnik in space, first, the Moon landing could have been a propaganda ploy.

But....could so many people keep this hoax a secret? Over all of the years.

Regardless, I'm open to it.

**nidhogg** · 24-09-2008, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by buriramboy

I've never believed that man set foot on the moon back in 1969, i mean people didn't even have microwaves and dishwashers back then, yet they had the technology to go to the moon and back, course they did!!!

Plus the Ruskies were miles ahead of the Americans in terms of space technology and they said at the time it couldn't be done and i agree with them. Oh yeah and also something to do with the Van Allen (spelling) radiation belt, apparantly you'd need a space ship about 20 meters thick built out of lead to pass through it and live to tell the tale.

I know I am wasting my time here, but what the hell. I am only waiting to knock off work to start a weeks leave, so what the hey.

1. The Van Allen radiation belt is passed through in about 1 hour. During that time, astronauts pick up 1/25th or so of the federal legal limit of radiation eposure. Astronauts have quite high levels of permissible (occupational) radiation exposure, but there are definate exposure limits. This is increasingly a problem with long stay trips (space station etc).

2. The REAL proof of the moon landings is in moon rocks collected on the many missions. These are on earth and have been examined by THOUSANDS of scientists from many, many countries. The rocks are undeniably unique and their veracity has NEVER been questioned by any scientist. Ever. Anywhere.

**dirtydog** · 23-09-2008, 07:52 PM

While we are dispelling myths I have proof here that aliens and UFO's exist, and that they visited the New York WTC, yep weren't no araaabs there that day.

**dirtydog** · 23-09-2008, 07:55 PM

UFO at the Twin Towers on 9-11

Asian video recorded on 9-11 that shows a UFO spiraling out of the clouds and going in between the WTC towers at the moment of impact of the second aircraft. Is it real? What is going on? The UFO appears to spiral out of the clouds a moment before impact of the plane.

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 07:56 PM

sadly, this is just a DD take the piss thread.

i expect the issues mods to rid themselves of this junk.

**pai nai ma** · 23-09-2008, 07:59 PM

start a real one. you got buriam boy on the hook already.

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:06 PM

what's your evidence for believing man went to the moon?

can't be that grainy tv footage.
that would be laughable.

**DrAndy** · 23-09-2008, 10:29 PM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

what's your evidence for believing man went to the moon?

can't be that grainy tv footage.
that would be laughable.

when I was a student, one of our courses was Lunar Geology

we had some rock samples which we examined under microscopes

they were nothing like any rocks seen before by us, or the various professors; very different crystalline structure

I suppose that a new type of rock could have been found and used, but unlikely

**buriramboy** · 23-09-2008, 08:08 PM

^^Ok then answer these 9 points................

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?

3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.

**Looper** · 23-09-2008, 10:53 PM

Originally Posted by buriramboy

^^Ok then answer these 9 points................

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?

3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.

10. Where is the Soup-Dragon?

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:09 PM

Originally Posted by Milkman

But....could so many people keep this hoax a secret? Over all of the years.

need to know basis.

sure they could,

and that's assuming they have kept it quiet, they haven't.

**barbaro** · 24-09-2008, 03:08 PM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by Milkman

But....could so many people keep this hoax a secret? Over all of the years.

need to know basis.

sure they could,

and that's assuming they have kept it quiet, they haven't.

Who are "they?"

The only people talking about this are off-the-wall conspiracy theorists.

**britmaveric** · 23-09-2008, 08:11 PM

MOON LANDINGS WERE REAL

**pai nai ma** · 23-09-2008, 08:12 PM

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:12 PM

^^
trust you to fall for them.

again obs.
where is your evidence?

**dirtydog** · 23-09-2008, 08:13 PM

Bigfoot? Did somebody mention Bigfoot? Plenty of videos of them to prove that they are alive and well, what more proof could you want?

Bigfoot attacks and kills people. (maybe the wrong video)

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by buriramboy

et it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath.

not a trace.

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:16 PM

by showing clips of hoaxes DD, you are merely supporting the ease of creating a hoax.

bigfoot was a pretty cheap job, cost a couple of dollars I think.
moon landing film can't have cost a great deal more.

very cheap hoax.

**dirtydog** · 23-09-2008, 08:17 PM

These are not hoaxes, I am helping the rights of idiots to allow them to be idiots

**ChiangMai noon** · 23-09-2008, 08:20 PM

WT building 7.

definitely caused by the fire.

Thread: Proof that some people are dumb enough to believe that man has been on the moon

Thread Tools

Display

Hybrid View

Proof that some people are dumb enough to believe that man has been on the moon

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions