^ Well, I've tried to reason with you BB. It appears you wont be reasoned with. You are desperately trying to win an argument that you lost a long time back. Nice of you to resort to insults. I guess that proves that you are losing the argument....!
You appear to fail to comprehend the meaning implicit in what I have written, taking things out of context and looking to twist the meaning, I presume as some lame defense mechanism. So be it.
I agree with your conclusion...
"1) Get the PAD off their back.
2) Attack PT any which way."
But then again, that wasn't the point was it...It is just something you added having failed to address the news article that I posted which supports my original contention. Oh well, never mind.