I really don't understand how an immigration lawyer could have made such an error.
I don't know what to believe now
I really don't understand how an immigration lawyer could have made such an error.
I don't know what to believe now
Thats what it was for the last year or so, supposedly now it has been changed to husband only.Originally Posted by gjbkk
I have looked at their website and I cannot see anything new, best if I look in the morning with less whiskey in my blood, but nothing on google except TV forum
The Thai Immigration website is pretty useless and presents little information in English.
These new rules, if true, have not been officially translated into English yet so confirmation will be a while coming
The translation wont make much difference anyway, as always it will be how each immigration office reads, understands and implements them.
One presumes it is the drink talking here? Either that or you are an idiot.
The order is clearly dated 25/11/08 and supersedes the previous relevant orders notably that of 2006.
Husbands can now qualify for a visa of 12 months with a deposit of 400k baht held in a local Thai bank for at least 2 months prior to application. Good news for those under 50 without an income but who do have a bit of dosh.
My status, as someone who was granted a mariage visa (just) before Oct. 2006, is that I only have to show 400K + in the bank- no income requirement, no 2 month requirement for the 400K.
Has that changed?
I might have had a drink last night but at least I am civil - however from your post you are nothing more than a คนเส็งเคร็งOriginally Posted by thegent
The order might be dated but there is no reference to it like a National Police Order as far as i can see.
if it has been change then I think thats good, it will help a lot of people.
Last edited by gjbkk; 05-12-2008 at 01:04 PM.
You mean "extension of stay" not visaOriginally Posted by thegent
does it not apply to a new visa also?Originally Posted by Thetyim
The discussion is about the new regulations 777/2551 which concerns extensions only
title needs changing then.Originally Posted by Thetyim
Immigration Bureau
nothing new here
Jack Golf confirmed by phone today that 30 days has been reduced to 15 days but the 3 entries rule has been deleted...so if you're from a country which had 30 before you now get 15 days but can enter as many times as you like in a year...Originally Posted by watterinja
rough with the smooth I suppose.Originally Posted by klongmaster
With all the faffing paperwork fees, etc, my yearly extension probably costs 12K each year, seems like I can now go across the border 24 times at equivalent cost - 500 baht or $10 each time.
But that money goes to Burma.
^^yea give a little take a little...certainly will bump the 'new arrivals' figures so Thailand can show the world that they are not hurting the way other countries are...
plus the cost of getting there and back...Originally Posted by CharleyFarley
might move to Mae Sai in a few years time.Originally Posted by klongmaster
is the border crossing only 500 baht to Burma?
I can envisage some farang ghettos appearing near the Myanmar and Malaysia borders soon
Hmm, I think there are other more important factors affecting tourism than the new 14 day regulations.Originally Posted by klongmaster
World wide economic crises, the exchange rate, and the recent turmoil comes to mind.
Don't forget that the majority of tourist arrives by air and stays 2 or 3 weeks.
Samui for instance, has (had) 1 million yearly visitors.
Compare that to an estimate (from one of the visa runs companies here) of around
1100 border runs being done monthly from Samui, and some of them not being visa exempt runs.
Will it have an impact on tourism?
No, I don't think so.
That sounds like a reasonable figure but the TAT figures for all tourist arrivals quote a very low average stay.Originally Posted by lom
Something like 5 days, which would mean that land border arrivals are very short stayers.
How do they sort the tourists from the smugglers ?
^also Tetters arrival by air still gets you 30 days which kind of fcks Lom's theory...
^Care to explain which theory it fokks?
If the average tourist stays for 5 days, then 14 days visa exempt is more than enough and 30 days is very generous
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)