Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    My kind of town
    chitown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,520

    Obama takes presidential oath again after stumble

    Obama takes presidential oath again after stumble - Yahoo! News

    Obama off to a great start already

    Obama takes presidential oath again after stumble

    After the flub heard around the world, President Barack Obama has taken the oath of office. Again. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the oath to Obama on Wednesday night at the White House — a rare do-over. The surprise moment came in response to Tuesday's much-noticed stumble, when Roberts got the words of the oath a little off, which prompted Obama to do so, too. Don't worry, the White House says: Obama has still been president since noon on Inauguration Day.
    Nevertheless, Obama and Roberts went through the drill again out of what White House counsel Greg Craig called "an abundance of caution."
    This time, the scene was the White House Map Room in front of a small group of reporters, not the Capitol platform before the whole watching world.
    "We decided that because it was so much fun ...," Obama joked to reporters who followed press secretary Robert Gibbs into the room. No TV camera crews or news photographers were allowed in. A few of Obama's closest aides were there, along with a White House photographer.
    Roberts put on his black robe.
    "Are you ready to take the oath?" he said.
    "Yes, I am," Obama said. "And we're going to do it very slowly."
    Roberts then led Obama through the oath without any missteps.
    The president said he did not have his Bible with him, but that the oath was binding anyway.
    The original, bungled version on Tuesday caught observers by surprise and then got replayed on cable news shows.
    It happened when Obama interrupted Roberts midway through the opening line, in which the president repeats his name and solemnly swears.
    Next in the oath is the phrase " ... that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States." But Roberts rearranged the order of the words, not saying "faithfully" until after "president of the United States."
    That appeared to throw Obama off. He stopped abruptly at the word "execute."
    Recognizing something was off, Roberts then repeated the phrase, putting "faithfully" in the right place but without repeating "execute."
    But Obama then repeated Roberts' original, incorrect version: "... the office of president of the United States faithfully."
    Craig, the White House lawyer, said in a statement Wednesday evening: "We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time."
    The Constitution is clear about the exact wording of the oath and as a result, some constitutional experts have said that a do-over probably wasn't necessary but also couldn't hurt. Two other previous presidents have repeated the oath because of similar issues, Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur.

  2. #2
    Whopping Member
    benbaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    28-09-2024 @ 08:52 AM
    Location
    In the comfy chair
    Posts
    5,549
    Incidentally, why is the VP oath not the same as the P oath?

  3. #3
    nid aur yw popeth melyn
    britmaveric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Pattaya
    Posts
    4,319
    separate office I think. If for some reason VP becomes pressie, I think they have to swear him in with the pressie oath.

  4. #4
    Days Work Done!
    Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:32 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    36,068
    Quote Originally Posted by chitown
    Obama takes presidential oath again after stumble
    Seems the redo was driven by a let's make sure all is "legal". Even though the constitution clearly states the new president takes off ice at noon Jan 20 with or without the oath, likely the redo was to make sure no law suits could be brought challenging Obama's right to the Presidency.


    Quote Originally Posted by britmaveric
    If for some reason VP becomes pressie, I think they have to swear him in with the pressie oath.
    Correct.
    "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"

  5. #5
    Luckydog
    Guest
    Mind Blowing!
    The great Black hope of the so called 'Free World' and the top
    Judge in the USA, cannot even get the Bluddy Oath right!!!

    God help us if that is any indication of what will happen from now on......

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat Texpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    13,063
    Oaf: It's just window dressing. Legally, there's no requirement for it.

    He should have recited it in Ebonics or عَرَبيْ.

  7. #7
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Luckydog View Post
    Mind Blowing!
    The great Black hope of the so called 'Free World' and the top
    Judge in the USA, cannot even get the Bluddy Oath right!!!
    Incorrect.

    It was Justice Roberts who made the error. He also didn't brink a note card with him. This is a non-issue, really. This thread could have been put in the "Obama news thread."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •