Thread: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or self defense ?

Originally Posted by panama hat

Yet it isn't that simple, just like a finished meal in a restaurant isn't that simple.

You get yourself a gun, drive for hours to place yourself in the middle of a riot, scare people with your gun, act like you're God with Gun . . .

Morons like yourself make it sound like he was the only one with a gun. When a cursory look at the footage shows 5 to 10 gun carriers in any given camera location.

So, still no promised audio recording to support your usual baseless claims . . . or are you going to keep clinging onto the "The FBI/CIA/Mossad/MI5/BND" 'done eraised them there facts' defense?

Originally Posted by panama hat

So, still no promised audio recording?

Just you wait! It’s comin’ and it’s gonna be RAW!

Sorry, beachbound, I forgot the "RAW' part.

Ant has fallen silent, which can only mean one thing, that haven been educated on the matter, he's now in agreement with Backspin. Good to see.


Ah shure Ant would post if it was otherwise.

Edmond not catching any fish....

Originally Posted by Troy

Edmond not catching any fish....

Needs some actual bait.

Assault rifle, cocked and ready sounds like premeditated murder to me.

Originally Posted by Troy

Assault rifle, cocked and ready sounds like premeditated murder to me.

Except there was hundreds of cocked and ready guns out on the street that night. If you try and steal a cocked and ready gun out of the hands of someone , you will be shot

Originally Posted by panama hat

So, still no promised audio recording to support your usual baseless claims . . . or are you going to keep clinging onto the "The FBI/CIA/Mossad/MI5/BND" 'done eraised them there facts' defense?

And when I find it, you'll just pretend that I didn't anyway.

Originally Posted by Backspin

Except there was hundreds of cocked and ready guns out on the street that night. If you try and steal a cocked and ready gun out of the hands of someone , you will be shot

Who the fuck would try to do that moron?. Its not an I phone 12. JHC

Originally Posted by beachbound

Just you wait! It’s comin’ and it’s gonna be RAW!

You and Troy and your minions on this thread just simply don't believe in self defense laws do you...

That's all this is.

Btw even if I find the audio , you'll just cover your ears if the source isn't CNN. And you'll just pretend that its fake and double down on the sophistry that is plaguing this thread.

Originally Posted by aging one

Who the fuck would try to do that moron?. Its not an I phone 12. JHC

Who would try and do that ? Joseph Rosenbaum. That's who. Do you think the videos showing what happened are CGI or something ?

Originally Posted by Backspin

.

Here again , is the FBI night vision footage showing what happened.

Are ppl blind ?

Originally Posted by Backspin

Who would try and do that ? Joseph Rosenbaum.

And he is dead

Talk about not even taking a knife to a gunfight.

I know that I asked it before: What was this guy "on" ?

After having seen some more of the evidence supplied by the prosecution, Including infrared video footage video from the state that was never available to the public before.(from a helicopter or a drone). I'm leaning more every hour to absolute self defense.

I may have some bias, and I am clearly able to show that. But watching the testimony it is becoming more evident that Kyle was chased down because of his "baby face".

Originally Posted by Backspit

Btw even if I find the audio , you'll just cover your ears.

Ah, don’t give up now, backspit! I’m sure you believe there’s an audio clip out there (albeit, raw), and that’s all that really counts, isn’t it?

Originally Posted by havnfun

absolute self defense.

Of course.


Only a troll (or simpo-dimpo) would think differently.

Originally Posted by helge

I know that I asked it before: What was this guy "on" ?

He was on medication for Bipolar Disorder and had only been discharged from a psychiatric ward the same day he was killed. He was acting aggressively towards just about everyone with a gun but was ignored by all as a loud mouthed nutter. Everyone else just walked away, regarding him as a harmless nutter...until a scared little boy decided he'd had enough and shot him for no good reason.

I am not that happy with the McGinnis evidence, how he suddenly stopped filming (it suddenly went to photo) at the time of the shooting and then mysteriously started again when it was all over. Was it deliberately deleted, after all the guy is a reporter for right wing press.

Evidence from Ryan Balch, suggests that he and Kyle Rittenhouse had a predetermined rendezvous point if they became separated. This is where Rittenhouse should have been heading towards if he felt threatened.

I wonder if the prosecution will quote any studies that have been carried out showing how someone armed immediately increases tension and aggressive behaviour by others. That is, studies have been carried out showing that being armed in a public area provokes aggression and hence self defence is out of the question.

Originally Posted by Troy

He was on medication for Bipolar Disorder and had only been discharged from a psychiatric ward the same day he was killed. He was acting aggressively towards just about everyone with a gun but was ignored by all as a loud mouthed nutter. Everyone else just walked away, regarding him as a harmless nutter...until a scared little boy decided he'd had enough and shot him for no good reason.

Thankyou; didn't know that

Originally Posted by Troy

.until a scared little boy decided he'd had enough and shot him for no good reason.

Let's see about that

Why are your ‘thoughts’ so momentous that they couldn’t just be added to the thread already in existence?

This is one of the things about you that pisses people off.

I was only responding.

Don't be so modest
A First Responder

Has a nice ring to it

Originally Posted by Backspin

It's a fact that Rosenbaum made a death threat to Rittenhouse.

According to this week's testimony, Rosenbaum threatened Ryan Balch and Kyle Rittenhouse happened to be in earshot at the time. Not quite the same thing as a direct threat before "wrestling with the weapon" (your words), which there is no evidence of him ever touching.

You still haven't explained the use of 4 shots. Do you think that shooting 4 times was reasonable force against an unarmed man who was heading for the deck after missing the rifle barrel?

Originally Posted by Troy

You still haven't explained the use of 4 shots. Do you think that shooting 4 times was reasonable force against an unarmed man who was heading for the deck after missing the rifle barrel?

Its just self defense training 101. Cops usually shoot more than 4.

A 2019 study of the Dallas Police Department found that in more than 130 shootings, officers struck their targets 35% of the time.

If officers are using deadly force, they're usually trained to not pause their fire and to shoot in quick succession -- taking a break to assess the suspect they're shooting at could give that suspect time to harm them or others, he said.


And legally, the number of shots officers fire often doesn't matter, he said: Under the Fourth Amendment, officers must have had reason to believe the suspect they fired on was a threat who could've killed them or caused great bodily harm.

Why police shoot so many times to bring down a suspect - CNN

This suspect basically absorbs 7 to 8 shots and still is able to stand up and get a shot off.