Special Counsel Mueller’s report paints a disturbing picture of a president who has been weaving a web of deceit, lies and improper behavior and acting as if the law doesn’t apply to him,”
Special Counsel Mueller’s report paints a disturbing picture of a president who has been weaving a web of deceit, lies and improper behavior and acting as if the law doesn’t apply to him,”
"Special Counsel Mueller’s report paints a disturbing picture of a president who has been weaving a web of deceit, lies and improper behavior and acting as if the law doesn’t apply to him,”
Oh my god, this is terrible. This is the end of my presidency, I'm f***ed," Mr Trump reportedly said when he first heard the Mueller inquiry was being set up.
---
Mr Mueller's team details 10 specific episodes in which Mr Trump attacked the inquiry, sought to control it and tried to encourage witnesses not to cooperate.
For example, the report says that Mr Trump called White House Counsel Don McGahn at home and "directed him to call the Acting Attorney-General and say that the special counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed".
Mr McGahn decided he would rather resign than carry out the deed.
So, the President asked two other officials to intervene on his behalf. Both refused.
Oh, and when the press found out about the incident with Mr McGahn, Mr Trump personally asked Mr McGahn to dispute the story.
https://www.xxx.xxx.xx/news/2019-04-...76?pfmredir=sm
Last edited by Cujo; 19-04-2019 at 09:45 PM.
“If we stop testing right now we’d have very few cases, if any.” Donald J Trump.
Watch this you tard.
Last edited by Cujo; 20-04-2019 at 06:05 AM.
Stands to reason and is consistent with how they've always operated; keeping their sources anonymous. Thus any reading of what Assange said (or ominously didn't deny) about Rich being interpreted that Rich was the source is not a reasonable reading. On the contrary, if Assange seemed to imply Rich did it, then we would know that Rich didn't.
Hannity is not very bright.
^because they're not very bright either.
He was right.
He's fucked.
https://news.yahoo.com/mueller-repor...172513001.html
The interesting part to me is how Trump directed his own aides and underlings to lie and otherwise interfere with the investigation and they refused.
Makes the whole 'I only higher the best people' thing all types of ironic. Bet Trumptards continue with the myth of Trump as great leader though.
In a scathing statement posted to Twitter, Romney became one of the first Republican members of Congress, and the most prominent, to criticize the Trump administration and the president for the behavior detailed by Mueller.
It is good news that there was insufficient evidence to charge the President of the United States with having conspired with a foreign adversary or with having obstructed justice. The alternative would have taken us through a wrenching process with the potential for constitutional crisis. The business of government can move on,” Romney wrote. “Even so, I am sickened at the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection by individuals in the highest office of the land, including the President. I am also appalled that, among other things, fellow citizens working in a campaign for president welcomed help from Russia —
including information that had been illegally obtained; that none of them acted to inform American law enforcement; and that the campaign chairman was actively promoting Russian interests in Ukraine.”
https://news.yahoo.com/romney-sicken...204630561.html
Last edited by Cujo; 20-04-2019 at 10:33 AM.
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.”
Read the report. Redacted version.
https://thebulwark.com/read-the-mueller-report-here/
From what I see 45 is pretty much off the hook for the moment.
Should Congress be successful in getting the full report probably something there to worry 45 but no way the AG is going to indict a sitting Prez.
The only viable path Congress has is to impeach. To do that they will need a lot more Reps to vote to impeach. Politicians being a cover their ass politically might moveto support impeachment but atm, I don't see the votes are there.
Think Elizabeth Warren is right. A waste of time.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"
My understanding is that only a majority is needed in the House of Representatives to impeach, but two-thirds in the Senate to convict. To get all 47 Democratic senators and 20 Republicans on board is unlikely.
there's no way they'll get 20 republican senators.
impeachment is not the best strategy for ending this abomination.
of course it's a waste of time, and if they really wanted to get him, they would have done it differently, he is exposed on all front
I think everyone is happy to see him to be where he is, so stupid policies can be carried out under his name
he has no fooking idea what he doing or what he is supporting anyhow, and his base is happy, so what's not to like
You're wrong Norton. Clinton was impeached. He was not removed from office by trial in the Senate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)