^&^^&^^^&^^^^
What a truly spectacular spectacle of complete and utter disassociation with reality.
Truly a gathering of clowns.
Perhaps Trump's next reality show; "The Clown".
The above is what I wrote......I've taken the liberty of bolding Jared Kushner.....and Jew supporting Israels interests.......just to help you out a bit with comprehension....Originally Posted by koman
You clearly are out of your freekin mind if you think that someone actually naming the particular person we were talking about is making some kind of "generalization".......Originally Posted by Humbert
I believe any normal person would read it the way it was intended, but that's your style. Twist what others write and attempt to turn into something it was clearly not intended to be, or quote completely out of context, just to try and provoke some kind of over reaction.... of course this exchange happened as a result of YOU bitching about Kuchner being a "fierce Israeli hawk" ...and he does happen to be Jewish so my comment about a Jew supporting Israel should not be too hard to connect with....
Oh and BTW; I'm no fan of Israel or expanding settlements either......I expect a balancing green from you for stating this.....
Originally Posted by longwayBolton as Deputy SecState is still up in the air...seems like mostly Republican opposition. I hope they succeed in keeping Bolton out of the State Dept.Originally Posted by misskit
G.O.P. Resistance Builds to John Bolton as State Dept. Deputy
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/14/u...puty.html?_r=0
continued at link...WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump’s extended deliberations over assembling a team to run the State Department are reviving some of the same debates that consumed the years of war and strife in the administration of George W. Bush. And in some cases, the cast of rivals is even the same.
The conflict has come to a head over choosing a deputy to serve under Rex W. Tillerson, the Exxon Mobil chief executive whom Mr. Trump selected this week to be secretary of state. Mr. Trump is weighing whether to choose John R. Bolton, a combative and strident advocate for an expansive American foreign policy who was closely aligned with Vice President Dick Cheney in the Bush administration.
Mr. Bolton’s nomination as deputy secretary of state would be subject to a vote in the Senate, and it is not clear whether he would survive his confirmation hearing. Senator Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, has said privately that he has misgivings, according to a person who has spoken with him. And Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, another Republican on the committee, has promised to block the nomination.
“There is something to be said,” Mr. Paul said Wednesday, “for one of the top diplomats in the country being diplomatic.”
Mr. Bolton, a State Department official under Mr. Bush who also served for a short time as United Nations ambassador, is also facing stiff resistance from some of the Republican Party’s best-known leaders in world affairs — some of them veterans of the Bush White House who often found themselves at odds with him during that period.
As for Kushner and Israel here's Phillip Weiss'(MondoWeiss) thoughts:
Jared Kushner fired me over Israel ten years ago
excerpt:
But I managed to get a frank description of apartheid in Hebron into the pages of the Observer.
This couldn’t last. In February 2007 Kaplan closed his office door and said he was a Zionist, Kushner was a Zionist, Kempner was a Zionist, and the janitor was a Zionist, too, and the newspaper would not pay for me to blog, as I was demanding (at that time I was only paid for published columns). It was fitting; I was gone.
My interactions with Jared were limited, but they don’t give me hope about his ability to achieve peace in the Middle East. He lived in a deeply-Zionist-patriarchal mental space then; I never saw him take a step out of it. There was a provincial element to his commitment. As Peter said, he didn’t know what he didn’t know. The guy who replaced Kaplan was even more of a Zionist than Kaplan, while the nimble-footed Kempner went on to work in the Kushner real estate firm. Kushner’s ambition and political shrewdness were evident to us, but I never saw any worldliness or largeness of spirit. He was very impressed by his own family. The big asterisk is that he was 25 and 26. I wouldn’t want anyone to judge me on the basis of stuff I said at that age . . .
Lastly, I bear no ill will to Jared Kushner. He paid for my first trip to Israel and Palestine (at 50!); he paid for me to see the occupation. My firing was also a blessing; he cut me loose from the paternalist mainstream media, and I was forced to sink or swim on the internet. To some smaller or bigger degree, I can thank Jared for this website, and the wonderful relationships I have formed through the internet with people of strong hearts and principle, qualities prestige media culture does not select for. For the sake of all of us, I can only hope Kushner gets to enter a larger world too.
Eat the Elephant...
In lalaland, it is Trump's (the literally hitler, white nationalist, putin puppet) problem to reconcile his strong support of the jewish state and his choice of hardliners on iran with your contention he is a nazi and a russian stooge.
That's called getting your tard on.
I have a couple of questions...
1. Wouldn't a president-elect have meetings with his cabinet picks to discuss their views on the position they are going to hold to see if they match his so there's not a disconnect between them and the president during the confirmation hearings?
2. Since trump's cabinet picks have wildly different views than trump's on what the US is going to do once trump gains the oval office, who's running the show?
^^Both religious and ideological reasons exist for supporting Israel but not Jewish people.
Besides, the Jewish State is living out the dreams of white nationalists; abusing Muslims, demolishing their homes, evicting them from the land....
^ Who is running the show? The Republicans of the hard right, it would seem.
Good we need more hard right leaders as the libtard agenda has been an absolute failure especially in Europe.
^^ You have reached into skull, and with a pair of tweezers, have twisted your tiny tiny brain into the shape of a pretzel to accommodate your nonsensical viewpoint.
And his son-in-law and close advisor being jewish and his daughter converted to judaism, along with his grandchildren? Quite a predicament for literally hitler.
This would be the pro-russian hard right faction of the republican party right?
It sure doesn't seem like it's Trump.Originally Posted by misskit
I'm still waiting to hear how posters think chump will handle Putins disapproval of the deployment of US troops on the Polish Russian border.
^^^ you are scum. It is clear that your are a lemming of RT and the russian government.
Originally Posted by longwaylongway is having a meltdown.Originally Posted by longway
Trump will have a Russian prostitute piss on him to say he's sorry for America doing that....Originally Posted by Cujo
This show is currently being broadcast.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Suddenly diversity is a bad thing in lalaland.
This a good sign imo, he is allowing a variety of viewpoints to be put forward, its important that both sides (or more) of a position are heard, something libtards, for all their fabled diversity ( and it is fabled as it doesn't exist) don't allow. For them diversity is all about gentilia, bizarre pronouns and skin hue, but having a hive-mind.
Speaking of diversity, Ben Carson had his hearing today, and did extremely well imo. I am really excited by this pick; its a bold one and I wish Carson every success - I think his heart is in the right place and he is a very accomplished guy; he could do very well, and I hope he does.
He was put through the wringer by Elizabeth 'Fauxohontas' Warren who pretends to have native american ancestry and defrauded her university by getting a scholarship on that basis. This fraud of course is one of the stars, a sacred vagina even, of the dims.
Libtards are comedy gold at the moment. Been 2 months since the election and they are still cratered.
You do understand these are not "viewpoints" but are the policies the next cabinet will be acting upon, right?Originally Posted by longway
^ I think you are the one who doesn't understand, or are trying your very best not to. This is what you wrote:
Wouldn't a president-elect have meetings with his cabinet picks to discuss their views on the position
How so?Originally Posted by longway
The people who voted for Trump all know he's just winging it and hasn't got a clue what he's going to do, they all accept that. Yet the libtards who didn't vote for him and hate him to the point they wish he was dead are constantly the ones all up in arms because they have no clarity from a man who hasn't even assumed the job yet.
^^ Updated the post.
Yep, we shouldn't expect clarity in America's policies from the next president or his cabinet members during their confirmation hearings.Originally Posted by buriramboy
So how would you explain the things Trump has said about his policies not even coming close to his cabinet members opinions on policy?Originally Posted by longway
^^Not if you hate America and want to see it fail.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)