President Donald Trump

**aging one** · 09-03-2017, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by CSFFan

The more intelligent among Trump's staff have to be realizing they're fucked...

Maybe 2 or 3 of them if they are anything like the Trump followers on TD.

**Cujo** · 09-03-2017, 05:02 PM

Rachel Maddows delivery annoys the shit out of me but her message is spot on.

**Topper** · 09-03-2017, 05:08 PM

Originally Posted by Cujo

Rachel Maddows delivery annoys the shit out of me but her message is spot on.

We should start a poll....which news agency will be the first to have incontrovertible evidence that Trump himself gave to the direction to soften the GOP's platform on Russia?

MSNBC?

**bsnub** · 09-03-2017, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by Cujo

Rachel Maddows delivery annoys the shit out of me but her message is spot on.

Ya we know that you hate gays. She is hot though you must admit.

**Storekeeper** · 09-03-2017, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by misskit

who ever sent me the green and told me to watch Rachael Maddow.

I think that was me...

Used to be I lumped her in with all the other talking heads. But watched her show recently and have started to have a change of heart ... for the positive. She just seems ... honest. And her educational background is impressive.

**harrybarracuda** · 09-03-2017, 07:55 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by Cujo

Rachel Maddows delivery annoys the shit out of me but her message is spot on.

Ya we know that you hate gays. She is hot though you must admit.

If you like butch carpet munchers.

**Cold Pizza** · 09-03-2017, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by misskit

who ever sent me the green and told me to watch Rachael Maddow.

I think that was me...

Used to be I lumped her in with all the other talking heads. But watched her show recently and have started to have a change of heart ... for the positive. She just seems ... honest. And her educational background is impressive.

Maddow is a political entertainer catering to a targeted market audience akin to other shills on the opposite side.

**Cujo** · 09-03-2017, 08:54 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by Cujo

Rachel Maddows delivery annoys the shit out of me but her message is spot on.

Ya we know that you hate gays. She is hot though you must admit.

Is she gay? I didn't know that.
And where did you get the idea I hate gays?

**Topper** · 09-03-2017, 08:55 PM

Originally Posted by Cold Pizza

Maddow is a political entertainer catering to a targeted market audience akin to other shills on the opposite side.

Much like my fantasy fuck, Kellyanne "I'm the Bomb!" Conway?

**raycarey** · 09-03-2017, 09:12 PM

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Much like my fantasy fuck, Kellyanne "I'm the Bomb!" Conway?

**Topper** · 09-03-2017, 09:17 PM

^ like you've not fantasized about banging her like a drum just to see if straw actually does come out her ears...

**UrbanMan** · 09-03-2017, 09:54 PM

Originally Posted by Farangrakthai

Originally Posted by UrbanMan

country-specific travel bans, overt racism, and the looming reconfiguring of the tax code largely in favor of the top 1%?

go on then urby,

which issue do you want to discuss first?

Tax code ...

1) All the promises about rebuilding infrastructure - don't you need money to do that? How does cutting Income Taxes fit in?

2) Does this look like something that is fair to all Americans?

**Cujo** · 09-03-2017, 09:58 PM

I hope he has a plan to make up the hole in the budget that will make. not to mention the cost of the wall.

**raycarey** · 09-03-2017, 10:22 PM

Originally Posted by Cujo

the cost of the wall.

oh yeah, let's not forget about that massive lie.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday threw cold water on President Donald Trump’s insistence that Mexico will pay for his proposed border wall.

“Uh, no,” McConnell said flatly, asked whether he thinks Mexico will foot the bill in an interview with POLITICO Playbook’s Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer.

McConnell on Mexico paying for the border wall: 'Uh, no' - POLITICO

**baldrick** · 09-03-2017, 11:17 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

a turnip

oi .. back off

**longway** · 10-03-2017, 06:17 AM

In real news. Consumer confidence the highest in 10 years.

https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/a...nomic-optimism

Consumer comfort index rose to 50.6 in the period ended March 5, the highest since March 2007, from 49.8
Measure has exceeded 50 just six times since April 2002

Looks like the people in the USA don't share the pessimism of the loons in lalaland.

**longway** · 10-03-2017, 06:27 AM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Breitbart is NOT a legitimate news source

I'll do your work for you:

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration

Ok so you were 'triggered'. So who gets to decide what is legitimate news? Breitbart is a WH accredited news source, just like many other outlets.

So care to point out how the breitbart article differs from the one you posted. Where is it misleading, what is in your link that shows the propaganda in the breitbart link?

**longway** · 10-03-2017, 06:30 AM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

You earned that red.

Got one from me too. Knocked off one of his gold bars. I plan to keep hammering away at him as long as he posts crap like that.

This guy is pitiful.

And he claims to be a 'CEO'.

**longway** · 10-03-2017, 06:34 AM

Originally Posted by misskit

Slowly, slowly, catchy monkey.

This from the website of Representative Eric Stalwell who sits on House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and is on the Subcommitte on the CIA.

Go to this link to read the entire write up.

https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/ru...tration-s-ties

This is brilliant, the further the dims dig themselves into a hole, the faster they dig.

And the loons claim that breitbart is a propaganda new site.

**longway** · 10-03-2017, 06:41 AM

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by longway

Yeah, I wonder why bother too. These guys are loons.

You and Jesus Jones saying we are loons. Two Alex Jones loving Hillary-has a-colostomy-bag nuts.

How much did the Russians pay you two to post up all that FAKE NEWS leading up to the election?

I think it should be noted this is the ONLY widely known rumour about Pissinabagillary that Snopes did not examine.

The only one, they looked at all the others, but not this one.

**tomcat** · 10-03-2017, 06:45 AM

...meanwhile, on a related front:

Trump Hotels Are Getting Hammered With Horrible Online Reviews
by Brad Tuttle, Money

President Donald Trump has been described as an Internet troll. Yet for months his critics have been trolling him right back, not just via social media but by bashing Trump hotels, restaurants, and resorts with bad online reviews—and the strategy could mean upwards of $100 million in lost revenues for Trump companies.

As Business Insider reported, a new study from the online rating market technology company Signpost shows that the average online ratings for Trump properties in the U.S. have declined about 40% since Trump became president. Researchers looked at three years of user review ratings at Yelp and Google to come up with the data, which indicate that 29 Trump properties now have an average rating of 3.7 stars out of 5. Around the 2016 election, the properties collectively had a 4-star rating.

The ratings dip may seem minor, but previous studies have shown that even a small decrease in online ratings can translate into a significant decrease in revenues. Signpost researchers estimate that the ratings drop would equate to a loss of at least $66 million over four years for Trump businesses, assuming the current review trends continue. “These calculations are conservative and according to the most recent revenue estimations,” the report stated. “The actual cost if these trends continue could be in excess of $100 million.”

It appears as if the lower ratings at Trump properties are mostly about politics. There is a long history of people attempting to manipulate online ratings by posting fake or ironic reviews on everything from Confederate flags to Paula Deen’s books to voice political opinions.

In December, the Trump Grill inside New York City’s Trump Tower lost a full Yelp star when online raters were inspired to bash the restaurant in the aftermath of a scathing Vanity Fair review. Similarly, the Mar-a-Lago Club, the Trump resort in Florida dubbed (by Trump) as “the winter White House,” has drawn the wrath of angry online reviews—as well as some supporting Trump that are just as fake—for weeks. At last check, Mar-a-Lago, which charges a $200,000 initiation fee for new members plus $14,000 in annual dues, has a 2-star rating on Yelp. This is so even though an alert on Yelp explains that the site has been actively removing “both positive and negative posts that appear to be motivated more by the news coverage itself than the reviewer’s personal consumer experience with the business.”

Interestingly, the Signpost study did not incorporate data from one of the biggest online review sites for hotels, TripAdvisor. In many cases, it appears as if Trump property ratings on the site are faring quite well. The Trump hotel in Las Vegas, for instance, gets 4.5 stars out of 5 based on 10,000+ reviews. Trump’s hotel in Washington, D.C., has a 4-star rating on TripAdvisor, which sounds good but actually makes it the #100 highest-ranked hotel in the nation’s capital out of 140 rated on the site.

For the sake of comparison, the Trump Hotel Washington, D.C., has just a 2.5-star rating on Yelp. “It’s too expensive for the average Trump chump to stay here, but I think there’s an RV park right outside the city for them with free water and sewer hook-ups,” one reviewer wrote of the property recently, awarding it a 1-star rating. “A tremendous, just tremendous, bigly bad experience,” another 1-star review mocks.

Finally, the Los Angeles Times recently reported that there are some bargain-hunting travelers who are voicing their opposition to Trump by refusing to stay in his hotels at even dirt-cheap rates. Hotwire and Priceline both have opaque bidding options that allow customers to get cut-rate reservations on hotels with two caveats: they cannot be changed, and you don’t know where you’re staying until a bid is accepted. Lately, many deal seekers have turned to the forum BetterBidding.com for help from fellow travelers to figure out the likelihood that a mystery property listed at a cheap price could be a Trump property.

“Help,” a typical message states. “I want to avoid Trump hotels.”

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/t...184639067.html

**Slick** · 10-03-2017, 06:53 AM

Originally Posted by tomcat

...meanwhile, on a related front:

This is the kind of thing libtards do. Troll.

**tomcat** · 10-03-2017, 07:04 AM

Originally Posted by Slick

This is the kind of thing libtards do

...repaying our debt to you, sensei...

**Humbert** · 10-03-2017, 07:12 AM

Trump supporters call for imprisonment and genocide against liberals. Fun group.

http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/t...-arizona-rally

**Maanaam** · 10-03-2017, 08:11 AM

Originally Posted by tomcat

Trump Hotel Washington, D.C., has just a 2.5-star rating on Yelp. “It’s too expensive for the average Trump chump to stay here, but I think there’s an RV park right outside the city for them with free water and sewer hook-ups,”

Thread: President Donald Trump

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions