^
It seems that you've got a wrong picture to the news:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2017/09/90.jpg
Printable View
^
It seems that you've got a wrong picture to the news:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2017/09/90.jpg
Why is it a surprise that they would get rid of cold war chemical weapons?Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
No mention of the new ones they've probably developed, however.
A lesson in a logical conclusion:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
if something was planned in 2020, but finished now, while not minding that his adversary has not made any effort: that's a surprise.
BTW, Harry, while you are so well informed about the new development of Vlad's chemical weapons, enlighten us about the current production of the US chemical weapons, or have the factories been already demolished? (or perhaps modified to a Tilenol production?). You surely know something, don't you?
(Please forgive my poor ThEnglisch)
If you think all the major powers haven't got their own Porton Downs, you are a bigger imbecile than I thought, and trust me that's big.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
What do you think about my imbecilness is not so interesting - and it has nothing brought to the topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
The topic is the surprising statement. And the point is that something like this has not been (sofar) issued by another peace-loving superpower.
The surprise is that you are actually dumb enough to believe this shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
Yet another one of your useless fucking cut and pastes.
Harry, you are used to the fact that your establishment always lies to you (and to others). So, it's quite a shock the discovering that there are others who do not.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
However, after all, why they should play fairly, anyway...
Fuck me, I wish there was a Google Translate language for fucking idiotic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
I'm sure somewhere in the world the production is still ongoing.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
I hope his horse has been given an extra ration of oats.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverna
Just listening to dangerous Mr. Putin - and others - who are live on RT at panel talk of a Energy Conference in Moscow.
Wondering whether Harry has not missed it to know more about thoughts of his friend Vlad? :)
I don't watch RT, it's a propaganda channel like VOA and Press TV you idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
How do you know, when you do not watch it, you i....? Perhaps from hearsay?Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
(Do not worry about the i-word, it is not idiot, it is something worse, it starts on s, ending on gnorant...)
Again, since perhaps it didn't sink in:Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
You idiot.
and the rest of the news channels are good and mighty and tell you the truth ... always? You are living in La La land like many that is tQuote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
The rest of the news channels (or most of them) are not state-controlled propaganda and have editorial independence.Quote:
Originally Posted by global
Well, except to whackjobs like yourself anyway.
This is what earns Emmys in Russia
If you don’t watch Russian television, perhaps you’ve never heard of Pervyi Kanal’s evening news broadcast “Vremya” or Rossiya-1’s weekend review show “Vesti Nedeli,” but they’re two of the most watched and influential news programs in the country.
This year, the Russian Academy of Sciences awarded TEFIs to both these largely pro-government TV shows, which air on state-owned networks. As a kind of retrospective, Anna Krasnoperova at The Insider reviewed five of the most notorious fake stories these programs reported in recent years.
1: Alexey Navalny works for the CIA
In April 2016, Dmitry Kiselyov’s “Vesti Nedeli” show aired a report accusing oppositionist and anti-corruption activist Alexey Navalny of cooperating with British and American intelligence agencies. The report was littered with oddities that raise serious questions about its credibility: supposed intelligence agents wrote in poor, bizarre English; an audiotape didn’t match Navalny's real voice; and, on two occasions, Navalny apparently time traveled, based on the timestamps found on “secret correspondence.”
The report also featured comments by three notoriously unreliable figures: Pavel Karpov, the police investigator who opened the criminal case that was ultimately used to arrest Sergey Magnitsky; Oleg Lurye, a journalist previously imprisoned for blackmailing the wife of a senator; and Alexander Mercouris, a disgraced, disbarred British lawyer who frequently appears in pro-Kremlin media, sometimes identified as a “Greek political analyst” or an “international affairs expert.”
2: The “rape” of Little Lisa
On January 11, 2016, Pervyi Kanal reported a fake story that would later be used in case studies of “Russian disinformation.” When a 13-year-old Russian-German girl named Lisa F. reappeared in Berlin after going missing for three days, she initially claimed that she’d been kidnapped and raped by three Arab migrants. Further investigation debunked this story, however, and Lisa later admitted that she went hiding voluntarily and wasn’t raped.
Even after police refuted the rumors about Lisa’s case, Pervyi Kanal continued airing news segments about her supposed rape. Apparently reacting to the coverage on Russian television, some Russian Germans even staged demonstrations in several parts of Germany to protest what Russian Foreign Ministry Sergey Lavrov called the German authorities’ tendency “to paint over reality in a politically correct manner for domestic reasons.”
A magazine run by NATO later called the Russian media’s coverage of the “Lisa case” a “wake up call for German political elites.”
3: Germany's Syrian refugee welfare king
Pervyi Kanal was one of many media outlets to report the fake story of a Syrian refugee named “Ghazia A.” living in Germany with his four wives and 23 kids, supposedly pulling down almost half a million bucks in welfare checks. In this same news report, Pervyi Kanal also recycled phony claims (later deleted from its website) that Austria’s Supreme Court acquitted an Iraqi refugee for raping a 10-year-old boy. (In fact, the man was sentenced to several years in prison.)
The report about Ghazia A., which first appeared in the German newspaper Rhein-Zeitung, was based on mostly false information. No German government official ever verified that a Syrian refugee was collecting so much money in benefits, and the “360,000 euros” figure actually comes from a financial expert named Hubert Königsstein, who merely speculated that a man in Ghazia A.’s situation could claim such benefits.
A municipality spokesperson told the German news service Deutsche Welle, however, that this isn’t how benefits work in Germany, where polygamy is prohibited, meaning that the Syrian refugee would have had to select one wife and claim her respective children for any social assistance.
At the end of the segment, Pervyi Kanal’s reporter even intentionally mispronounced Ghazia A.’s name to make a joke.
4: Refugees terrorize the Swedish city of Malmö
On February 19, Pervyi Kanal aired a report from Malmö, describing Sweden’s third biggest city as a “remote corner” of the country transformed into a dystopian hellhole by a “criminal wave” of Arab migrants. The report claimed incorrectly that Muslim immigrants make up 43 percent of the city’s population (in fact, only 32 percent of the city’s residents were born abroad, and far from all of them are Muslim).
Pervyi Kanal also presented Fridhem, a neighborhood in Malmö, as a particularly dangerous area, though local sources told The Insider that it’s actually a generally peaceful place. According to the crowd-sourced global database Numbeo, Malmö’s overall level of crime is “moderate,” scoring it significantly higher than American metropolises like Baltimore and Chicago.
As it happens, a day before Pervyi Kanal's report on Malmö, U.S. President Donald Trump made headlines by alluding to a nonexistent terrorist attack in Sweden. “Sweden, who would believe this?” Trump asked a crowd of supporters in Florida.
The president later explained that he was referring to a segment aired on Fox News, where filmmaker Ami Horowitz claimed that migrants in Sweden are responsible for a new crime wave. Two Swedish police officers interviewed in Horowitz’s documentary later told reporters that their comments were edited selectively and taken out of context.
5: Creative dubbing in France
On May 15, “Vesti Nedeli” aired a segment about “the political situation in Europe,” focusing on the “growing Euroskeptic movement in France.” The show’s correspondent interviewed several activists who demonstrated against a new labor law, but the Russian dubbing completely changed their comments, rewriting what they said from start to finish as a rant against immigrants.
Needless to say, French television ridiculed the news report, and even tracked down the protesters interviewed by “Vesti Nedeli,” who were horrified to learn how their comments had been mistranslated for Russian viewers.
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2017/10...mmys-in-russia
You don't half spout a load of shite Harry.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
:smileylaughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Stop it man, you're killing me.
The "independence" strictly supervized by Rupert Murdoch and his "friends"...Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Funny how idiots like you and albert would rather believe dictator-controlled state media than any other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
Pair of morons.
And funny how schmucks like you actually believe the blinkered, myopic, partisan shite your favoured propaganda leads you to believe.
FOH
Unlike you Albert, I tend to read a plethora of subjects from across the political and cultural spectrum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
As opposed to watching RT and believing every piece of Vlad's shit like the gullible little fool that you are.
Nah..you're a one-trick pony.
Yeah, that's the "little fool" part of "gullible little fool" speaking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
:smileylaughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
they decry the " mainstream media " but are happy to latch onto every story about arab rape gangs etc
those who are admiring vlads empire I suggest they should read - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/...ng-is-possible
Like I said, gullible.Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
Not to irritate the nation ( and Harry as well) listening to the independent media not controled by state
the RT will be pulled
Does anyone know what this idiot is on about?Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
Happy Birthday Putin, today you are 65
If you actually read some of the items posted here, by at least me and possibly others, you might find some differences in quoting facts and named sources, less possibles, uncertainties and responsibilities for accuracy.Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
There are differences in the quality of "reporting", fact checking, accountability, a more thorough, more detailed analysis and possible outcomes. All of which tends to increase ones ability to "swallow" the proffered morsel.
A hundred page contract or legal agreement as opposed to a 140 letter tweet? I suppose it all depends on ones attention span.
Happy birthday to The LORD and Russia.
https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...tid=2505&stc=1
Sputnik 1 was launched on October 4, 1957, from the Baikonur Cosmodrome aboard a modified R-7 Semerka, the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile.
I've not read the book so far. Is it purely on The LORDS period of leadership or more historical? Has The LORD improved the situation or just carried on as prior leaders?Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
Correct. There is a big difference between reputable news sources and the fucking dross you post all the time from Vlad's personal TV station or other whackjob websites.Quote:
Originally Posted by OhOh
A news source may be "reputable", when reputing only the negative about the adversaries, whilst the negative about himself will be "humbly" omitted.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Red Scare redux? US imposes World War II-era ‘foreign agents’ designation on Russia mediaQuote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
The Soviet-era McCarthyism that swept America in the mid-20th century was mere child's play compared to the Russophobic hysteria now running amok in the land, where Russian media is even being required to identify itself with a Nazi-era designation.
This week, during a session of the Russian Federation Council’s Interim Committee on the Protection of Sovereignty, RT’s Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan explained that according to the channel’s lawyers, the US branch staff could face harsh penalties if RT fails to follow through with the demands.
“We received a letter from the US Department of Justice, demanding that we register as a foreign agent. By October 17 we must ‘whip ourselves’ and say that we are a foreign agent,” Simonyan said, adding that “[our] lawyers tell us that if we [RT’s American branch] do not register as a foreign agent, arrests of our employees, seizure of property will follow – absolutely serious things.”
As was the case with the expulsion of Russian diplomats in the US, which led to tit-for-tat actions, Moscow may have no choice but to impose retaliatory measures against US news outlets operating on Russian territory.
“Our [Russian] legislation envisages a possibility of imposing retaliatory restrictions against the… media of the states that have restrictive [regulations] specifically limiting the professional activities of Russian journalists,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said at the meeting.
What is especially disconcerting about these latest developments is that they were decidedly unnecessary and avoidable.
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/405940-ru...oreign-agents/
Some empire our Vlad has now, control of Russia and the USA. Really should get more credit for winning the game of thrones.
And Crimea.Quote:
Originally Posted by buriramboy
And the Saudi Arabia as well...Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Vlad is the dragon lady in Games of Throne
Trump is Tyrion Lannister :)
and Hillary is of course Cersei Lannister :p
One could include China, India, Vietnam, Venezuela and DPRK as all are on very good terms with The LORD and his government. Possibly Turkey as well, although some see ongoing difficulties.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
In fact there appears, in some media, that more countries see Russia in a more favourable light than most western countries. :) On a % of world population count, I suspect The LORD is continuing his "World Domination" on a miniscule budget and less internal angst compared to many of the alleged more sophisticated or developed countries.
How much were those adds, US$50k. How much does ameristan spend on its 17 "intelligence agencies" :confused: ? One of which has even admitted Russian "manipulation" is a fake phantasy.Quote:
Originally Posted by buriramboy
Normal TV programming follows this Part Political Programme. Game of Thrones, is that a Japanese scat candid camera channel I am missing?
One wonders how ameristani/UK/democratic free press/TV/newspapers/Global News providers" would survive without their "exclusive briefings" from "unnamed" and therefore fake, official services members".Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Because everything RT says is true eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by OhOh
Gullible fool.
:rofl: