Thread: Military intervention in Syria

The UK must not follow the US

It's clearly set up for another war... The Syrian government seem to be winning, the Iranians are not playing ball; bomb (and invade?)...

stupid Holland is falling for it too, he is a traitor, same as Sarko

Originally Posted by Butterfly

stupid Holland is falling for it too, he is a traitor, same as Sarko

There is too much that we don't know. I supported the over throw of Saddam but Im not sure if I support this.

The thing is, Assad is an Iran ally and Iran is the chief sponsor of Hezbo and Hamas.

Oh good. Just what we needed *ANOTHER* Syria thread.....

Originally Posted by Gerbil

Oh good. Just what we needed *ANOTHER* Syria thread.....

Another war that we do not want.

As sad as it all is ( orphans, dead babies, limbs blown off, burns, etc.etc.etc.) it is through violent unrest that democracies are eventually forged, so best let them get on with it until a winner is declared.

Then, and only then, if the winner is not to the wests liking, should the west intervene.

I don't get it. Yep, poison gas sucks. But why is it the US's obligation to once again jump in. I didn't get it for Iraq, I don't get it for Syria, and whateverthefuck Afghanistan was meant to prove, that was doomed from the beginning. It's not like the US doesn't have several thousand vats of malodorous shit on its own shores to clean up. I don't get it.

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I don't get it. Yep, poison gas sucks. But why is it the US's obligation to once again jump in. I didn't get it for Iraq, I don't get it for Syria, and whateverthefuck Afghanistan was meant to prove, that was doomed from the beginning. It's not like the US doesn't have several thousand vats of malodorous shit on its own shores to clean up. I don't get it.

Oil.......what else. I do not see the Americans and British running off to the Congo to sort out the problems there and many millions have been killed there but I guess that the Congo does not have the huge oil reserves that Iran has. This Syria gig is all about Iran and the strategic/economic interests of the west,it has nothing whatsoever to do with a humanitarian crisis,if it did then the west would have bombed the crap out of Israel /Congo/North Korea years ago.

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I don't get it. Yep, poison gas sucks. But why is it the US's obligation to once again jump in. I didn't get it for Iraq, I don't get it for Syria, and whateverthefuck Afghanistan was meant to prove, that was doomed from the beginning. It's not like the US doesn't have several thousand vats of malodorous shit on its own shores to clean up. I don't get it.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a United Nations Security Council resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolution 660, Resolution 661, Resolution 678, Resolution 686, Resolution 687, Resolution 688, Resolution 707, Resolution 715, Resolution 986, and Resolution 1284). [1]


On 8 November 2002, the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous 15–0 vote; Russia, China, France, and Arab countries such as Syria voted in favor, giving Resolution 1441 wider support than even the 1990 Gulf War resolution.

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I don't get it. Yep, poison gas sucks. But why is it the US's obligation to once again jump in. I didn't get it for Iraq, I don't get it for Syria, and whateverthefuck Afghanistan was meant to prove, that was doomed from the beginning. It's not like the US doesn't have several thousand vats of malodorous shit on its own shores to clean up. I don't get it.

Jump in? They forged it along with the UN!

Next stop Iran!

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I don't get it. Yep, poison gas sucks. But why is it the US's obligation to once again jump in. I didn't get it for Iraq, I don't get it for Syria, and whateverthefuck Afghanistan was meant to prove, that was doomed from the beginning. It's not like the US doesn't have several thousand vats of malodorous shit on its own shores to clean up. I don't get it.

Don't forget Bosnia.

The US has yet to learn anything since Vietnam. Too quick to go where we are not wanted and wind up with nothing but more dead soldiers.

Here's an idea..why don't we just let all the mutherfucken middleasterners kill each other and then we could just walk in an take the oil?

I,m not very happy about this at all !

3 years ago I bought an L E D telly to reduce my carbon footprint ,, I do hope when Iran releases the bombs its not gonna wipe out all the good work I have done

Would have been a fantastic run for our US+UK military if we were still in Iraq.

Imagine it all those tanks crossing the border.
Our tech is infinity superior - Tanks + Attack Helos with infrared sensors, guided missiles, all connected via data link.

It's like playing a computer game on cheat mode!

Originally Posted by ShrewedPunter

Would have been a fantastic run for our US+UK military if we were still in Iraq.

Imagine it all those tanks crossing the border.
Our tech is infinity superior - Tanks + Attack Helos with infrared sensors, guided missiles, all connected via data link.

It's like playing a computer game on cheat mode!

Thats right. Abrams tanks have a touch screen in them for the kill. Pretty fucking cool eh.



Might as well put some of this hardware to work

Originally Posted by poorfalang

the reason for the US wanting to go in is the Chemi bomb?
i am really worried about this,
if they think they will just go there and fuck the place like iraq and afgha, they are wrong, they will get a much stronger response from Syria,
Iran and Russia has sold them earlier this year missile defense systems and also jets,
Russia and Iran will not be drawn in at all, they are waiting for the day the US is at it's weakest point and then strike and kill that NWO, for good

Assad is scared shitless of Israel and the US. He's a pussy. He didn't do anything when Israel bombed them in 2007.

Originally Posted by socal

Thats right. Abrams tanks have a touch screen in them for the kill. Pretty fucking cool eh.

Oh so cool is it? kontt

Originally Posted by socal

Might as well put some of this hardware to work

YOur day will come, the chinese and russians will take care of you lot, just when you though this NWO is ready to take place

Sorry for all the innocents getting killed but it is not in our national security interest so why get involved, let Russia sort it out even if it means helping Assad kill all the opposition who are probably mostly Islamic nut jobs

DOES OBAMA KNOW HE'S FIGHTING ON AL-QAEDA'S SIDE?

FLASHBACK: Biden Wanted to Impeach Bush for Attack w/o Congress...



What a sorry lot these people are...

Just call it a big win for McCain. He goaded Obama into his stupid 'red line' remarks and now he is being shamed into action over an issue of no strategic importance to US interests. There can be no good outcome from US retaliation. Let it burn itself out without the US mucking things up even more.

I find it incredulous that UK parliament should be recalled because of a civil/religious war in a far off land.
Did the Assyrians offer help in 1644?