When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

Miss Great Britain, Zara Holland, has been stripped of title after apparently having sex on ITV2's Love Island (although no explicit scenes were shown).

But here's the bit I don't get.

Beauty pageant organisers said they had “no problem with sex” but said they could not condone Holland’s relationship with 24-year-old scaffolder Alex Bowen.

:confused: Is is 'cuz he's a scaffolder?

In a statement, Miss Great Britain organisers said, “We pride ourselves on promoting the positivity of pageants in modern society and this includes the promotion of a strong, positive female role model in our winners,” they said.

:confused:

Surely a "strong, positive female" in 21st century Britain can shag who the hell she likes! What a great role model for emancipated adult females.

Here's a photo of her for those not sure.


https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1185.jpg

If I didn't know your posting history I'd guess this is all a cheap set up for morons.

Here's a better pic:)

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1189.jpg

Thanks, I didn't even know the pageant was still running, and surprise we have a Miss Great Britain.
I really don't care about her sex life, she's hotter than those ugly virgins that George Best hung out with, a low life drunken footballer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Surely a "strong, positive female" in 21st century Britain can shag who the hell she likes! What a great role model for emancipated adult females.

---

Absolutely. Burn the bra, knock him on the head with a club and drag him by his hair to her bedroom.
You go girl.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyrille

If I didn't know your posting history I'd guess this is all a cheap set up for morons.

---

:confused:

Sorry. I'm not sure what you mean. It's a news article from Friday.

Miss Great Britain loses title after having sex on ITV2's Love Island | Media | The Guardian

I am British and I fully support single British women's right to shag who they like. The point I was making (perhaps unsuccessfully) is that the pageant organisers say they are not against sex and that it is normal but they stripped Zara Holland of her title for having sex. Perhaps they would have preferred her not to or to pretend she didn't. But that's not what they are saying. They seem to be hypocrites.

I would like to have sex with her bottom.

:yup:

She's a cheap hoe, obviously

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJ Pat

She's a cheap hoe, obviously

---

That should help.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by withnallstoke

I would like to have sex with her bottom.

:yup:

---

Would you strip her of her Miss Teakdoor Lounge 2016 title if she let you?


(Or if she let Dillinger or Slap?) :spin:

Quote:

---

Surely a "strong, positive female" in 21st century Britain can shag who the hell she likes!

---

strong positive females dont seek the attention of either the gutter press or the ignorant pondlife that worship reality shows and the toerags that appear on them, neither do they have sexual intercourse on national tv.

strong positive females keep their bedroom activities in the bedroom where they belong and would not publicly demean themselves in the same way as this woman whose only positive attributes are a pair of silicone tits and an open all hours kunt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Would you strip her of her Miss Teakdoor Lounge 2016 title if she let you?

---

Definately not.









And who said anything about "letting" me? :ourrules:

I love when girls get so horny that they release all latches but if you are crowned Miss Great Britain then it is probably a good idea to not do that in public during that year.

Quote:

---

I love when girls get so horny

---

i doubt if she was in any way horny.

the talentless but manipulative slapper just saw it as a good career move in a society that has become so cheapened by "reality" that fucking a brickie on tv makes national headlines.

must say, the pic in post one, she looks like a scaffolders whore. fuck it pains me to say that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJ Pat

She's a cheap hoe, obviously

---

absolutely, would have to be pretty desperate to go after her

she probably goes after every guys actually,

she is a cow, so typically Brits I assume, no wonder all you Brits are fucking homos

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJ Pat

She's a cheap hoe, obviously

---

absolutely, would have to be pretty desperate to go after her

she probably goes after every guys actually,

she is a cow, so typically Brits I assume, no wonder all you Brits are fucking homos

---

Take note folks. The biggest shirtlifter on TD, the man who trawls dark back streets for a few mouthfuls of ladyboy jizz, is calling other people "homo".

:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

---

A woman being seen to be too free with her sexual favours is not being a strong positive role model; she is being a slag.

Having sex with a co-contestant on a reality TV show is advertising her promiscuity and is poor judgement.

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

If a woman is seen to be too free with her sexual favours society will shun her for disrupting the natural order.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lob

the pic in post one, she looks like a scaffolders ho

---

Or a brickie's hod. RIP DD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

---

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

---

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

---

No it hasn't it just likes to think it has.

did she strap on the plastic and ream the blokes arse ?

I could see how that may have tarnished some image

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

---

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

---

No it hasn't it just likes to think it has.

---

That's interesting. Perhaps some parts of Britain (or some people) have and some parts (or people) haven't. A divided society. Or perhaps individuals want to believe one thing but inwardly their emotions say something else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

---

A woman being seen to be too free with her sexual favours is not being a strong positive role model; she is being a slag.

Having sex with a co-contestant on a reality TV show is advertising her promiscuity and is poor judgement.

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

If a woman is seen to be too free with her sexual favours society will shun her for disrupting the natural order.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lob

the pic in post one, she looks like a scaffolders ho

---

Or a brickie's hod. RIP DD.

---

Wow, just like your views on rape, you are showing your out-dated attitude: "Natural order"....Woman should be chaste, demure, virginal, barefoot and in the kitchen.

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

A Trump voter, clearly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baldrick

did she strap on the plastic and ream the blokes arse ?

I could see how that may have tarnished some image

---

Yeah, but tarnished only amongst prudes.

^ I was thinking the scaffolder

he may have been the rough tough homophobe in front of his mates