When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

---

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

---

Long term sustainable solutions to society's perceived ills (such as sexual discrimination against women) need to take into account human nature. The better we understand why we have tendencies to act the way we do the better we can establish social and legal frameworks to manage behaviour and set expectations correctly. There is nothing inherently 'good' about trying to deny human nature. A woman who is too free with her sexual favours will likely always be seen as morally wanting due to the evolved nature of the sexual game. Her harshest critics in this context are likely to be other women.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

---

Prostitution being a female occupation rather than a male occupation is a clear indicator that what I am saying about the sexual equation is correct. Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexuality since it represents a constrained reproductive resource. Men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex. That is why the economic equation works for prostitution.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Prostitution being a female occupation rather than a male occupation

---

seriously ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_prostitution

^What would you estimate is the ratio of female to male heterosexual prostitution in the world?

More or less than 99.9% ?

Reality TV demeans society far more than a young woman giving in to hormonal influences. How many posters on here would have spurned her advances?

Quote:

---

a young woman giving in to hormonal influences

---

nothing to do with hormones, all to do with increasing her "profile" and maximising her fees for future promotions.

it was a calculated business move, nothing else.

she is a woman whose talent lies not in her intelligence or personality, but in her tits and snatch, and she is making the most of her 15 minutes of fame by degrading herself like this.

thousands do reality stunts, most make money, but only a small minority manage to retain their dignity.

An interesting opinion, Tax. So she's a strong female businesswoman.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by taxexile

but in her tits and snatch

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by taxexile

degrading herself like this.

---

you need to make up your mind

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

male heterosexual prostitution

---

why did you qualify it ?

Quote:

---

An interesting opinion, Tax. So she's a strong female businesswoman.

---

well, hardly, but she is a chancer, and although there are many who would jump to be in her position, few would consider her a suitable role model for their wives, sisters or daughters to look up to.

it is sadly possible these days to achieve much in the way of fame and financial success by having little or no talent whatsoever and just dumbing yourself down to the lowest possible common denominators in society, casting off all pride, dignity and self worth, jumping through the low hoops conveniently provided by slavering agents and media producers and feeling no shame at being gawped at by a disbelieving and equally stupid public.


the person who comes up with a cure for cancer will get 2 lines on an inside page and nobody will remember their name after 5 minutes, but an airheaded gobshite slapper with cartoon tits who fucks a brickie on tv is in the news for days and will be making £££££££ from public appearances and photoshoots for the next few years and will be hero to thousands of other airheaded gobshite slappers.

the world has truly gone mad.

:smileylaughing:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baldrick

^ I was thinking the scaffolder

he may have been the rough tough homophobe in front of his mates

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baldrick

why did you qualify it ?

---

Because we are discussing the politics around female heterosexual promiscuity.

The direction of business in which heterosexual prostitution goes sheds light on the nature of the evolved sexual relationship between men and women so it is relevant.

Male homosexual prostitution is not a very relevant issue by comparison.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

An interesting opinion, Tax. So she's a strong female businesswoman.

---

Maybe not a very savvy businesswoman if she has lost the prestige and fame associated with a miss world UK title and an appearance at the finals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

---

.... Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexuality since it represents a constrained reproductive resource. Men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex. ....

---

So, all the women I've had sex with without marrying or paying them are less evolved?
Men (gay or not) who don't chase women are less evolved?

^Individual men or women are not more or less evolved than other individual men or women. That is not how evolution works.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

^Individual men or women are not more or less evolved than other individual men or women. That is not how evolution works.

---

It's exactly how evolution works: natural selection implies some individuals (more evolved) are different and more likely to survive than the less evolved individuals.


But put that aside.....you have stated (twice) that woman have evolved to guard their sexuality (bad grammar, but I get what you mean). My question is, if you are right, why do so many women NOT "guard their sexuality", as evidenced by the hundreds I've scored, and I'm just one average bloke....extrapolating, it gives us that MOST women do not "guard their sexuality".

What has 'evolved' are the societal mores over the centuries, not to be confused with biological evolution.

Female prostitution has even less to do with evolution.

What a weird argument. lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stroller

are the societal mores over the centuries,

---

In California you go on the sex register for being caught having a piss in public. :rofl:

She didn't play the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by taxexile

most make money, but only a small minority manage to retain their dignity.

---

Especially after i've been sniffing around their backsides.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stroller

What has 'evolved' are the societal mores over the centuries, not to be confused with biological evolution.

Female prostitution has even less to do with evolution.

What a weird argument. lol

---

Good point, and you are right. Our esteemed fellow member, though is actually talking about biological (Darwinian) evolution....fallaciously.

Its a tad deep this thread.

Do you old cnuts remember the days where the conversation was just- Would you nail that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dillinger

Its a tad deep this thread.

---

Yeah.

Soz about that Dill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dillinger

Do you old cnuts remember the days where the conversation was just- Would you nail that?

---

That's why I posted the picture in the OP, Dill.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1185.jpg

I probably would, Dillinger, casting off all my pride, risking the loss of my dignity and self-worth, and possibly even being called a slapper for my moment of weakness. :sad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dillinger

Do you old cnuts remember the days where the conversation was just- Would you nail that?

---

That's why I posted the picture in the OP, Dill.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1185.jpg

I probably would, Dillinger, casting off all my pride, risking the loss of my dignity and self-worth, and possibly even being called a slapper for my moment of weakness. :sad:

---

I would. After several bourbons. But sober, I doubt I'd chase it unless she was clearly putting out and I hadn't had one in a while.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dillinger

Do you old cnuts remember the days where the conversation was just- Would you nail that?

---

That's why I posted the picture in the OP, Dill.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1185.jpg

I probably would, Dillinger, casting off all my pride, risking the loss of my dignity and self-worth, and possibly even being called a slapper for my moment of weakness. :sad:

---

I would. After several bourbons. But sober, I doubt I'd chase it unless she was clearly putting out and I hadn't had one in a while.

---

Oh, I wouldn't chase her either, but if she wanted to satisfy her lust with me, I wouldn't knock her back (so long as we were both 'single' at the time).

^ Anybody who wouldn't nail that up the trumper is a shifter.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/213.jpg

^ Touche. :)