Circumcision; Did we Fok up?

**Whiteshiva** · 15-01-2008, 03:43 PM

I am sure that if nature (or God/Allah, for that matter) had meant for us to go without foreskins, we would have been born without it.

It serves a purpose, it is easy to keep clean, fun to play with, and I for the life of me cannot understand why people are so obsessed with chopping it off.

Besides, circumcised people trying to convince the rest of us how wonderful it is, reminds me of vegetarians telling us how wonderful life is without meat.

**Rigger** · 15-01-2008, 03:55 PM

Originally Posted by Driventowin

report published in the British Journal of Urology assessed the type and amount of tissue missing from the adult circumcised penis by examining adult foreskins obtained at autopsy. Investigators found that circumcision removes about one-half of the erogenous tissue on the penile shaft. The foreskin, according to the study, protects the head of the penis and is comprised of unique zones with several kinds of specialized nerves that are important to optimum sexual sensitivity.

You are dening your son full pleasure
Really just because you where cut and a hygine problem that no longer exists.
Anyway your choice
Just rember it feels better getting my dick sucked than it does yours

**AntRobertson** · 15-01-2008, 03:59 PM

Originally Posted by Rigger

Just rember it feels better getting my dick sucked than it does yours

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

And as we all know it's a numbers game - quantity trumps quality everytime

**Driventowin** · 15-01-2008, 04:00 PM

The Almighty made us with a lot of things we don't really have a useful purpose for anymore. Just a few that come to mind, appendix, wisdom teeth, tails (which we lost some time ago) Ant (lawyers).. Oh! Damn...We still need them....But that's what evolution is, useless bits and pieces falling off or being removed when they are no longer useful or needed..

Damn Ant if I knew you were going to take that stance I wouldn't have included you in this post...

Originally Posted by Rigger

You are dening your son full pleasure
Really just because you where cut and a hygine problem that no longer exists.
Anyway your choice

Apparently you missed my more recent post where I stated that I was reconsidering his circumcision.....

Originally Posted by Rigger

Just rember it feels better getting my dick sucked than it does yours

Very presumptuous of you, I have never even thought about you once while I was getting a good BJ...

So I'm very sure it feels every bit as good...

**AntRobertson** · 15-01-2008, 04:02 PM

Originally Posted by Driventowin

The Almighty made us with a lot of things we no longer need... (lawyers).. Oh! Damn...We still need them

Some more than others, eh DTW. To explain difficult concepts like British cf. English. For example.

**Marmite the Dog** · 15-01-2008, 04:05 PM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

Utter rot.

**Rigger** · 15-01-2008, 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

We are in Thailand it doesnt matter cut or uncut just how fat your wallet is

**AntRobertson** · 15-01-2008, 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

Utter rot.

It's scientifically proven by science.

**Marmite the Dog** · 15-01-2008, 04:10 PM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

Utter rot.

It's scientifically proven by science.

No it isn't.

It's another excuse made up my fellows with incomplete tackle to justify it.

**AntRobertson** · 15-01-2008, 04:14 PM

I wouldn't be so dismissive of decades of scientific reasearch and study - the ladies find it to be more asthetically pleasing.

**Marmite the Dog** · 15-01-2008, 04:17 PM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I wouldn't be so dismissive of decades of scientific reasearch and study - the ladies find it to be more asthetically pleasing.

That's strange. Al the ladies I asked said they preferred a proper penis.

**Whiteshiva** · 15-01-2008, 04:19 PM

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes but circumsized men are more likely to receive a good knob-gobble than those with a foreskin.

Utter rot.

Why? - If Ant has a preference for circumcised men, we will just have to accept that.

**AntRobertson** · 15-01-2008, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I wouldn't be so dismissive of decades of scientific reasearch and study - the ladies find it to be more asthetically pleasing.

That's strange. Al the ladies I asked said they preferred a proper penis.

You sure those were ladies... ?

Perhaos they were uncircumsized men in another 'life'

**Marmite the Dog** · 15-01-2008, 04:47 PM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I wouldn't be so dismissive of decades of scientific reasearch and study - the ladies find it to be more asthetically pleasing.

That's strange. Al the ladies I asked said they preferred a proper penis.

You sure those were ladies... ?

Perhaos they were uncircumsized men in another 'life'

Do I look French to you?

Thread: Circumcision; Did we Fok up?

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions