OP said the father is the biological father... But what is important is whether or not the father registered himself as the father at the amphur.
No registration, no rights.
OP said the father is the biological father... But what is important is whether or not the father registered himself as the father at the amphur.
No registration, no rights.
Legitimizing the child at the Amphur can only take place once the child reaches the age of 7. Before that it can really only be done through a court. So Worrior you are correct in that until the father legitimizes the child he has no parental control.Originally Posted by Warrior
Edit: The father in this case obtained farang passports. I'll have to ask if he legitimized them also. He may think that by getting them farang passports they are legitamized.
Last edited by Pragmatic; 18-05-2017 at 03:22 PM.
Fluke's PM reply:
I will only give legal advice for cash.
Took grandkids to Singapore last year. Same process at both ends as well. Parental consent letter needed. Go prepared.Originally Posted by DrB0b
My kids travelled out of Thailand on UK passports with me and my surname, immigration didn't bat an eyelid either end.
I dont know how you managed that without a tug, unless you entered on British passports... surely they would be flagged straight away for not having an entry stamp.Originally Posted by Chittychangchang
I tried to use my daughters Brit one to leave and was taken to one side with the wife and made to use her Thai passport.
I flew to Malaysia then and wasnt allowed to use her Brit passport to enter, they said she had to use the same passport she left the last country on.
She has a few stamps in her Brit passport now though
This was back in 2010, might have changed since.
They have full English names, born in England and travelling on British passports in and out of the Kingdom.
Effectively and officially British so in theory and practice, no reason to question their travel with their parent.
Have heard this from others before. It all seems a little hit and miss.Originally Posted by Chittychangchang
Not if the kids were born in Thailand and obtained their first farang passport whilst here.Originally Posted by Dillinger
Yes if the kids were born in Thailand
Of course theyll be the ones to be held back
You idiot Flouncy.
This is about kids born in Thailand and leaving for the first time, ie, without an entry stamp in their Western passport.
Sorry, it's not. I was just pointing out to Dillinger where a child may have a farang passport on exit that doesn't have an 'entry stamp' in it.Originally Posted by Luigi
Which is what I did as we needed a passport for my son and I was unable to get married at the time (trying to divorce somebody I hadn't seen for 20 years )Originally Posted by Pragmatic
I don't know about that. I do know they've been out of the country in the past and returned. Both parents were with them at the time.Originally Posted by Luigi
What about a child who resides in Thailand, born to a foreign parent, but is classed as Stateless?
Not Rohingya, but thinking more Hill Tribe.
Child has never left Thailand, has a valid UK Passport obtained by his caring father who has got his shite together and finally organised one for him.
Mother doesn't agree to the egress, but she is Stateless, thus her voice is Mute under Thai Law? (question)
The child in question is not Thai, thus Thai Laws do not apply? (question)... asking on behalf of a Forum Friend
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)