Thread: Top Judge Declares Global Warming a Myth (from CL)

Originally Posted by stroller

Originally Posted by britmaveric

Well there happens to be 50% of scientists that don't buy global warming.

50% of all scientists, or of those working in relevant fields, or what?
Link?
-don't worry, I won't hold my breath...

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's a few for starters. Come on Stroll, you can google like the rest of us.

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

He may not have said it in those words, but to make a legal ruling that the information contained in it is bullshit he is implying it, no doubt.

Oh dear, nor did he make a "legal ruling" that the information was "bullshit".

It really is quite gobsmacking at how you're distorting this to fit your own preconceived notions, truly a case or reading only what you want to believe.

Originally Posted by britmaveric

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Here's a few for starters. Come on Stroll, you can google like the rest of us.

There are, at most, 50 names on that list. And not only that, but they are catergorised into camps that only disbelieve one or more certain aspects of global warming not the entire theory.

Those that catergorically "believe global warming is not occuring", one. That's your 50% of scientists today!?! That's the trouble with simply repeating something, it doesn't always make it come true.

^

A judge is not a scientist. He can make a ruling that a video featuring a prominent politician is inappropriate for schoolchildren, but it's certainly not proof global warming isn't real; it is.

It's a natural cyclical process except this time there are unprecedented high levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases that appear to be speeding up the process.

Time will tell; preventing schoolchildren from getting all the facts won't help.

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

This is just a Class War.

Exactly.
Gore and his latte-liberal friends/Hollywood bleeding-hearts etc jetting about in their Gulfstreams...give. me. a. break...........

So, which "class" represents for and which against Global Warming, you geniuses?

Originally Posted by stroller

So, which "class" represents for and which against Global Warming, you geniuses?

It's not a 'for' or 'against' issue, Headmaster.
Everyone admits that the globe is geting warmer it's just the hype involved in how much man has influenced it or possibly the sun is stronger or possibly it's a cyclical thing and on and on...

So, which "class" is involved in the hype?

The revolutionary united workers front in alliance with pinko fairy fake scientists who want to disown all car-owners?
Or what conspiracy theory is at work here?

Working-class people know it is a scam to get the cash out of our wallet.

The middle class just like to bully the working class & will use any old stick to beat them with - like banning smoking in pubs. They have a superiority complex (as we have seen on this thread) & can't fathom the basic fact that global warming or not, there are bigger problems facing the world today.

Look at what's happening in Burma & some people are bothered about what light bulbs we use & stuff? They have opinions but no hearts.

Interesting, usually it goes the other way, like the commies are using the green movement for their grass-roots networking. Hmm...

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

Working-class people know it is a scam to get the cash out of our wallet.

Some believe it's a scam, many don't.

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

Look at what's happening in Burma & some people are bothered about what light bulbs we use & stuff? They have opinions but no hearts.

One doesn't exclude the other, one is an acute crisis, the other an ongoing issue which may well affect our children.

Originally Posted by stroller

one is an acute crisis

The other is a fantasy. There is a hundred grand on offer to anyone who can prove climate change is man made & nobody has stepped up to claim it.

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

Originally Posted by stroller

one is an acute crisis

The other is a fantasy. There is a hundred grand on offer to anyone who can prove climate change is man made & nobody has stepped up to claim it.

It's up to 125K now

Heh...

But what if there were a £100,000 to prove it isn't man made, nobody would be able to claim that either.

So without conclusive proof, one way or another, you're convinced your side of the argument is the right one?

There is no conclusive proof for either argument, but you are more vehement and scathing in your own defence, almost to the point of religious fervor.

The weight of evidence says that global warming/climate change is a reality and that man's contribution to enviromental degredation cannot be ignored, you can argue the toss all you like, but you just come across as selfish, ignorant and gullible. Erm yeh, just like a Daily Mail reader.

Actually I think it is better to do something than to do nothing, just in case.. you know for the future.
In fact Europe is very enviromentaly pro active anyway, the main objections to what would seem overwhelmingly obvious outcomes come from the US establishment and those who's interests lay in continuing deregulation of carbon emissions and pollutants.

Originally Posted by Robski

There is no conclusive proof for either argument

Then you don't have a case.

You may as well be arguing about the existence of God.

It is very telling that the surface temperature of Mars is rising at an identical rate as the Earth. Little green men in little green Range Rovers, or an event that is out of our hands?

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

Originally Posted by Robski

There is no conclusive proof for either argument

Then you don't have a case.

QED; after nearly 24 hours of your moronic ramblings, neither do you.

What will the Daily Mail have in store for you tomorrow?

Originally Posted by Robski

neither do you

Great way to win an argument after over twenty posts on the matter. You can't prove what you are saying so you tell me to show you're talking bullshit? It is not the position of person being told something to be the one to prove it & you know it.

At least you have finally admitted defeat - in a way.

Here - this is yours

Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are?

One of my few ventures into Issues is when I see something about Global warming. Is there global warming ? I say yes but to the cause who knows. One day you will read in a report in the paper that something is contributing to this and the day after another report will conteract this.

Unfortunately to many people and organisations are jumping and the bandwagon of green issues and global warning. It is also a way for Governments to take extra tax from us under the pretext that it will be used to combat the effects of global warming.

I reckon a poll in the Captains Lounge (to give it more coverage) would be interesting. Two questions 1. Is there Global warming 2. In your opinion what has caused this. Will set this up tomorrow.

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

Originally Posted by Robski

neither do you

Great way to win an argument after over twenty posts on the matter. You can't prove what you are saying so you tell me to show you're talking bullshit? It is not the position of person being told something to be the one to prove it & you know it.

And there's me thinking English was your first language.

Originally Posted by Robski

And there's me thinking...

Don't bother ski, Richard owns you - admit it...

Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn

So without conclusive proof, one way or another, you're convinced your side of the argument is the right one?

Yet you've manage to extrapolate from an article that actually says no such thing: "Top Judge Declares Global Warming a Myth"?

Who is trying to convince who? There is clearly a debate on the existence and causes of global warming and it's even more clear where you stand on that issue. However 'citing' articles such as this help your case not one jot.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Robski

And there's me thinking...

Don't bother ski, Richard owns you - admit it...

Yeh I give up, he's worn me down and I am now a firm believer in anything he says.... I'VE BEEN OWNED!!

Originally Posted by Robski

Yeh I give up, he's worn me down and I am now a firm believer in anything he says.... I'VE BEEN OWNED!!

Go ahead and try to make a joke out of it,, but BM is correct,, RL has you by the balls with a downhill pull.