Thread: Iraq News
View Single Post
Old 17-12-2008, 03:51 AM   #862 (permalink)
spiff
Impregnator
 
Last Online: 31-07-2009 02:13 PM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: amidst dogs and ducks
Posts: 2,735
spiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expatspiff Thailand Expat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat
But it won't stop him from putting that feather in his hat -- despite being against it at every turn
A bit off-topic here, but this is not correct:
Quote:
Originally Posted by March'07
...But a review of Obama's record during his 26 months in Congress reveals that he has taken a more nuanced and cautious position on the war than the full-bore opposition.
Campaigning for the Illinois Senate seat in 2003 and 2004, Obama scolded Bush for invading Iraq and vowed he would "unequivocally" vote against an additional $87 billion to pay for it. Yet since taking office in January 2005, he has voted for four separate war appropriations, totaling more than $300 billion.
Last June, Obama voted no to Senator John F. Kerry's proposal to remove most combat troops from Iraq by July 2007, warning that an "arbitrary deadline" could "compound" the Bush administration's mistake. And last week, he voted for a Republican-sponsored resolution that stated the Senate would not cut off funding for troops in Iraq.
Though liberals want Congress to stop funding the war in order to end it, Obama has indicated that he will vote for the latest $95.5 billion Iraq appropriation when it comes before the Senate this spring. ...
spiff is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07344 seconds with 16 queries