Well it isn't as though you've magically developed a wit all of a sudden is it.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Nope, still not funny.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
^
It's a pump-action actually...![]()
Heh - where's Lily for this one:
MORE GUNS, LESS CRIME: Michigan sees fewer gun deaths — with more permits.
Six years after new rules made it much easier to get a license to carry concealed weapons, the number of Michiganders legally packing heat has increased more than six-fold.
But dire predictions about increased violence and bloodshed have largely gone unfulfilled, according to law enforcement officials and, to the extent they can be measured, crime statistics. The incidence of violent crime in Michigan in the six years since the law went into effect has been, on average, below the rate of the previous six years. The overall incidence of death from firearms, including suicide and accidents, also has declined.
More than 155,000 Michiganders -- about one in every 65 -- are now authorized to carry loaded guns as they go about their everyday affairs, according to Michigan State Police."
It's a fact, Jack, it doesn't work to take guns away from the folks.
Michigan sees fewer gun deaths -- with more permits
A Deplorable Bitter Clinger

So how many people were killed or injured through the abuse of handguns in Michigan?Originally Posted by Boon Mee
You have not shown that taking guns away from people doesn't work, but given an example of how regulated issuing to carry has not increased crime-rates. As for the decline of deaths from firearms, you have not provided any figures nor made a plausible argument about cause and effect.
Try again.
It's really extremely simple: someone without a gun can't shoot anyone.![]()

I think anyone who's been taught how to use a gun correctly and legally, and has common sense and decency, would never aim at a person (well, I might take out an intruder's nuts if he had a knife to my mom's throat). I'd rather die from a bullet than a knife slashing frenzy.
Smeg, bless him, posted the following in another thread. he was of course using it to illustrate just how crap Thailand is but I think it's relevant to this thread also:
One thing that's immediately apparent from that list is that the nations with stricter gun controls fall near the bottom.
End result's the same. Apparently being stabbed isn't as painful as one might think and neither is the pain associated with it (i.e a 'stabbing' pain) correct. I saw a documentary on it once and they interviewed surviours of stabbings and shootings and the stabbing victims said it was more like a dull, blunt, punch than 'stabbing' - can't recall what the gun-shot victims said though.Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon
You think, well, that's reassuring.Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon
Anyway, I take it you support stricter gun-control then?![]()
Yep, playing with guns is good for boys:
Gun Safety GuideBetween 1994 and 1998, 6,287 children committed suicide with a firearm and an additional 1,896 children were killed by unintentional gun injuries in the United States. All together, 23,776 children under age 19 died from a gun related injury during these years, which is equal to 13 children a day.

Is that to say if children didn't have access to guns there wouldn't have been 6,287 suicides ? If someone wants to kill themself then the method doesn't come into it, they'll kill themselves.Originally Posted by stroller
Less than there were before the issue of carry permits.Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog
Well how many children were killed in South Africa with bush knives during the same time?Originally Posted by Ivor Biggun


I dunno, Strolls. There are so many laws and controls now in the West, but are people any better for it? Fek, they even have trash police now.
If I grew up in a controlled state and couldn't fire a gun when I was 12, would I be a better person? Dunno. I didn't turn out to be a killer. I still like popping cans off the fencepost with the .22 when I go home.

I give up on that one. How many commited suicide with bush knives during the same time. The question is irrelevant. The same as yours.Originally Posted by blackgang
and all those kids who were kids BEFORE the gun was invented ?"BANNING boys from playing with toy guns is futile and may even damage their development, a leading child psychologist has warned"
what a lot of crap.
Well, how many? Why don't you look up the stats if you think it's relevant?Originally Posted by blackgang
Of course not. This isn't about making people "better persons", it's about preventing the use of guns for causing harm.Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon
Again: guns have a much larger attack range than knives and most other 'weapons', nobody will kill an entire classroom of students while standing in the doorway and yielding a knife, club or bow and arrow - no gun, less lethal power.
Someone who might get his gun and pull the trigger, would not necessarily use a knife or their bare hands if no gun was available - there is a distinctly different quality to being able to do harm with the motion of one finger, and from a (sometimes) safe distance.
Guns are offensive weapons.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
Pobly used what ever was the main weapon of the time, Bow and arrows, club, Rock on the end of a cord [mace] kids always make weapons for toys, just like most of us made play swords and spears.Originally Posted by Mid
Thats why most of us grew up fairly normal.
Seems tho that Krauts were not allowed to do those things.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)