Thread: Thai Police checking on foreigners, mainly teachers

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

^Why are reporters your fall guys?

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

....he'd buy out the assassination contract, but he can't because the reporter only earns a pittance,

I forgot it is just the "fourth rice paddy" here -but it is not like the internet hasn't allowed alot of information/allegations to roam free from the luddites

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

should I give a job

You looking for any more staff?

Originally Posted by dirtydog

^Hell most of it is made up and totally inaccurate anyway, why would a forum pay for crap like that

So why do you repost it if its so bollocky?


Anyway, if any of you feel strongly about an old codger banging a schoolgirl, don't wait for the press. Slap it on the internet ! Name names !

You're all journalists now.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Did he repent and pledge himself to the good lord?

lovely lad.
salt of the earth.
went camping with him up Inthanon a few years ago.

best we managed were a few beers.
bugger all drugs on display.

I’d like to know what your definition of pedophile is. Under 18? (one day under?). How about a willing 15 year old sexually active teenager—I won’t call her a ‘girl’ since she can get pregnant—should a man go to jail for years for having sex with a willing 15 year old teenager? 15 seems to be a cutoff age in Thailand below which the ‘crime’ is prosecuted more seriously, and the adult ‘offender’ seems to receive a longer sentence.

Wikipedia: “Pedophilia is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction by adults to prepubescent youths. …The term pedophile is also used colloquially to denote an adult who is sexually attracted to adolescents or youths below the local age of consent.”

So, the word can mean two different things, depending on what the agenda of the prosecutors/accusers is.

I understand why there are laws against having sex with children, children being defined as not having reached sexual maturity (‘prepubescent youths’ in Wikipedia’s terminology). I don’t understand the ‘foaming-at-the-mouth’ ‘string-em-up’ mentality when two people who aren’t children decide to have sex.

In the United States female teachers have sex with their male students and often only get slapped on the wrist. These female teachers are not met with the same kind of hysteria guaranteed to hit a man if he has sex with a 17 year old, or a 16 year old, or a 15 year old. I remember a couple of female teachers and other older women from my teenage years who I wished would have had sex with me! It would have been an educational experience.

A 16 year old boy can have sex with a 15 year old girl (I did when I was 16), and not worry about facing a long jail sentence. “Aw, look at the cute kids having sex.” But, watch out if you are a man over 21. “You monster! I hope you have lot of money for a defense attorney! Cause we’re gonna lock you up and throw away the key! Bad, bad man!”

Teachers, and others in positions of power and authority over teenagers, are understandably expected not to have sex with their students/underlings. But when there is no ‘power dynamic’, and the sex is consensual, willing, loving and joyful—and the youth is over 15, let’s say--then why throw a man in jail for years for this? (Isn’t 15 the age of consent in one or more states in the USA?)

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Anyway, should I give a job to a drug convict who was done for possession of a couple of spliffs 12 years ago and assume that the Thai Government are incapable of finding out or no

I haven't applied for any jobs with you.

Originally Posted by guyinthailand

I’d like to know what your definition of pedophile is. Under 18? (one day under?). How about a willing 15 year old sexually active teenager—I won’t call her a ‘girl’ since she can get pregnant—should a man go to jail for years for having sex with a willing 15 year old teenager? 15 seems to be a cutoff age in Thailand below which the ‘crime’ is prosecuted more seriously, and the adult ‘offender’ seems to receive a longer sentence.

Wikipedia: “Pedophilia is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction by adults to prepubescent youths. …The term pedophile is also used colloquially to denote an adult who is sexually attracted to adolescents or youths below the local age of consent.”

So, the word can mean two different things, depending on what the agenda of the prosecutors/accusers is.

I understand why there are laws against having sex with children, children being defined as not having reached sexual maturity (‘prepubescent youths’ in Wikipedia’s terminology). I don’t understand the ‘foaming-at-the-mouth’ ‘string-em-up’ mentality when two people who aren’t children decide to have sex.

In the United States female teachers have sex with their male students and often only get slapped on the wrist. These female teachers are not met with the same kind of hysteria guaranteed to hit a man if he has sex with a 17 year old, or a 16 year old, or a 15 year old. I remember a couple of female teachers and other older women from my teenage years who I wished would have had sex with me! It would have been an educational experience.

A 16 year old boy can have sex with a 15 year old girl (I did when I was 16), and not worry about facing a long jail sentence. “Aw, look at the cute kids having sex.” But, watch out if you are a man over 21. “You monster! I hope you have lot of money for a defense attorney! Cause we’re gonna lock you up and throw away the key! Bad, bad man!”

Teachers, and others in positions of power and authority over teenagers, are understandably expected not to have sex with their students/underlings. But when there is no ‘power dynamic’, and the sex is consensual, willing, loving and joyful—and the youth is over 15, let’s say--then why throw a man in jail for years for this? (Isn’t 15 the age of consent in one or more states in the USA?)

"Aw, look at the cute kids having sex. " ......(er, that statement is disturbing on so many levels!)

"But, watch out if you are a man over 21".....(or 61 even! )

Still....

Here we go! Here we go! Here we go !

Welcome perv-guests to Dirty Dog's 'succes de scandale'

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

[quote

"Aw, look at the cute kids having sex. " ......(er, that statement is disturbing on so many levels!)

"But, watch out if you are a man over 21".....(or 61 even! )

Still....

Here we go! Here we go! Here we go !

Welcome perv-guests to Dirty Dog's 'succes de scandale'

You have taken my statement out of context, something someone such as yourself who has harped on journalistic principles, should know better than to do. My writing speaks for itself so I won’t bother to defend in detail your post.

Regarding your statements elsewhere that Teakdoor could be interpreted as ‘promoting’ pedophilia by its numerous posts on the subject, and could ‘help’ pedophiles in their search for prey—I think the opposite is true: would-be pedophiles reading Teakdoor will surely be sobered by what awaits them in Thailand if they are caught. They will actually be less likely to come to Thailand to attempt sex with prepubescent youths. In other words, Teakdoor serves as a deterrent to this type of behavior. The Thai authorities should give Teakdoor a medal for crime awareness and prevention—not shut them down as you hysterically have suggested elsewhere may happen.