Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    I'm in Jail
    attaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    11-12-2013 @ 11:30 AM
    Posts
    4,042
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang View Post
    Israeli airplanes first attacked the Liberty with missiles and cannons, disabling it. It was before this that communications were sent to Israeli command identifying the ship as US, but the attack was told to commence. Fifteen minutes later, Israeli navy arrived and finished the job. During this time, US warplanes were scrambled to assist the Liberty, and ordered back to base- that order emanating from the Secretary of Defence, McNamara.

    The Liberty was a communications ship- a spy vessel. It was also very close to Egypt, and the scene of several Israeli actions there. To state the obvious, it would have sent several Maydays out while being attacked. Yet the order to specifically not assist it came fromk the Defence Department, and no action was taken to call off the attack from either Israel or the US- in fact the order was given for the attack to continue.

    So they must have intercepted something real sensitive methinks, which senior US and Israeli defence, intelligence and government personnel absolutely did not want released. To the point the US was willing to let an ally sink one of it's ships, with corresponding loss of life. I doubt we will ever know what that information was.
    What would that be and how would it be kept quiet? The US did not want to escalate an incident and have that incident further escalated in the media. It would show weakness in unity, something the Soviets and their allies might try to exploit. It appears the US went well out of its way not to raise a stink about friendly fire.

    Did some senior US politicians consent to the Liberty being sunk, and if so why?
    I'm still not sure what you mean. They really couldn't stop it from sinking. There was nothing close enough to stop the Israelis and no one had any idea the Israelis were going to attack.

  2. #27
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Officially it wasn't anywhere near where it was, and the bigger question is not why the Israelis attacked it but why it was there in the first place.

  3. #28
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    04-06-2013 @ 09:51 AM
    Posts
    1,888
    The USS Liberty was never sunk, or is that another cover up ? It actually made it to Malta under it's own steam. Just shows you that when someone writes a book in the US, conspiricey theories jump to the fore making it an automatic best seller.

  4. #29
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Could be the IDF just wanted to seriously distract the crew from whatever info they were transmitting or gathering. If they wanted it sunk it wouldn't have reached Malta.

  5. #30
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    40,667
    It's true that the Liberty was not sunk, it made it to port and was scrapped.
    Really though, why would the Secretary of Defence specifically turn back a rescue mission.
    Why would the Secretary of Defence even know?

  6. #31
    I'm in Jail
    attaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    11-12-2013 @ 11:30 AM
    Posts
    4,042
    I don't know what the rescue mission was made up of.

  7. #32
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    40,667
    In the first instance, jets were scrambled. It all goes hazy after that- it appears the Liberty limped to port alone, but not sure. Surely the dead and wounded were evacuated?

  8. #33
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    40,667
    Quote Originally Posted by keda View Post
    Officially it wasn't anywhere near where it was, and the bigger question is not why the Israelis attacked it but why it was there in the first place.
    Indeed. Accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, but I believe the attack was deliberate. For whatever reason, the NSA sent the ship where the Defence people & top politicians absolutely did not want it to go, namely off Sinai (international waters notwithstanding).
    It will remain theory- stuff at this level does not get released, and information that is released will only tell you what they will let you know.

  9. #34
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    04-06-2013 @ 09:51 AM
    Posts
    1,888
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang View Post
    It's true that the Liberty was not sunk, it made it to port and was scrapped.
    Really though, why would the Secretary of Defence specifically turn back a rescue mission.
    Why would the Secretary of Defence even know?
    Perhaps to save face. Or because America believed whole heartedly that they had no ships within 350 miles of the battle and the ship under attack wasn't theirs. Looks as if one department wasn't playing by the rules and letting other departments know what they were upto. The USS liberty wasn't under the control of the Navy so the original statement "the US has no ships within 350 miles of the battle" was true. But the ship was under the command of The National Security Agencey and therefore didn't form part of the said statement. There's your fuck up.
    Last edited by Ivor Biggun; 09-10-2007 at 11:26 AM.

  10. #35
    Not again!
    machangezi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    13-05-2022 @ 04:22 PM
    Location
    Out there!
    Posts
    7,695
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Some released documents not only indicate the Israelis knew they were attacking an American ship, and the U.S. government covered it up.
    New revelations in attack on American spy ship

    Veterans, documents suggest U.S., Israel didn't tell full story of deadly '67 incident

    By John Crewdson |Tribune senior correspondent October 2, 2007 Article tools

    Bryce Lockwood, Marine staff sergeant, Russian-language expert, recipient of the Silver Star for heroism, ordained Baptist minister, is shouting into the phone.

    "I'm angry! I'm seething with anger! Forty years, and I'm seething with anger!"

    Lockwood was aboard the USS Liberty, a super-secret spy ship on station in the eastern Mediterranean, when four Israeli fighter jets flew out of the afternoon sun to strafe and bomb the virtually defenseless vessel on June 8, 1967, the fourth day of what would become known as the Six-Day War.


    Related links
    For Lockwood and many other survivors, the anger is mixed with incredulity: that Israel would attack an important ally, then attribute the attack to a case of mistaken identity by Israeli pilots who had confused the U.S. Navy's most distinctive ship with an Egyptian horse-cavalry transport that was half its size and had a dissimilar profile. And they're also incredulous that, for years, their own government would reject their calls for a thorough investigation.

    "They tried to lie their way out of it!" Lockwood shouts. "I don't believe that for a minute! You just don't shoot at a ship at sea without identifying it, making sure of your target!"

    Four decades later, many of the more than two dozen Liberty survivors located and interviewed by the Tribune cannot talk about the attack without shouting or weeping.

    Their anger has been stoked by the declassification of government documents and the recollections of former military personnel, including some quoted in this article for the first time, which strengthen doubts about the U.S. National Security Agency's position that it never intercepted the communications of the attacking Israeli pilots -- communications, according to those who remember seeing them, that showed the Israelis knew they were attacking an American naval vessel.

    ....The documents also suggest that the U.S. government, anxious to spare Israel's reputation and preserve its alliance with the U.S., closed the case with what even some of its participants now say was a hasty and seriously flawed investigation.
    Link: New revelations in attack on American spy ship -- baltimoresun.com
    Milky USS Liberty's one of the so many screw ups.

    Does anyone remember or ever heard about Lavon affair where Israeli agents planted bombs, 1954, in American library and some other spots where the chances of Western casualty was high? The aim was to paint Egyptians as terrorists and to fock up the Egyptian relations with the West. The Israelies never denied this!!!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair

    http://www.mideastweb.org/lavon.htm

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/lavon.html

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/lavon.html

    Also in early 50s the Israelies played another dirty game when they targeted their own Jews in Iraq in order to get their arse to newly occupied Israel.
    http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/ameu_iraqjews.html


    The list goes on! I can't be arsed to search info on this matter.

    But hey Israelies can't kill anyone.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •