Marmite the Dog

I've read an awful lot of opinions, facts, lies, etc., about all the warzones happening around the world and in many cases my first reaction has been 'oh no - those poor people' or 'those fucking American kunts have been screwing things up again', but there are still some unresolved, nagging questions that I'm uncertain about.

I'll try to explain what I mean as simply as possible for the non-English posters.

Since man first left Africa (or the alien spaceship) we have been killing each other over the best waterholes, animals, women, land, religion, ideals, politics or just simply for the hell of it.

Are we better than that or is killing the true nature of mankind?

Is peace on Earth something we will ever achieve or is it unattainable, and unwelcome?

Is the survival of the fittest, strongest, smartest the natural order of things and the extermination of the sickly, weak and stupid just Mother Nature's way of advancement within the human race?

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

--

I'm not sure that there is a right or wrong answer.

Many westerners would argue that if the Muslims were wiped out, the Earth would be a much nicer place to be. I'm also sure that many Muslims would say the same about the extermination of the 'white man' too, but the Muslim nations are not 'the strongest' in present times, so that is not what I am discussing.

Most great civilisations have conquered and enslaved the weak. Should the West, or just the US, give in to the natural order of things and just wipe out those that don't 'fit', or are we above all that now?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I will meet the blackness and the blackness will be eternal