Thread: Run, Baby!

To be fair and unbiased (please take note DJ) this was a poor policy introduced by the GOVERNMENT.

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

Notice the date...almost 2 years ago

They are chasing this couple now though.

Nothing's changed.

this was a poor policy introduced by the GOVERNMENT

With some cash incentives that they jumped on like vultures.

Where are their morals?

I rip people off all day every day & feel bad about it sometimes, but I would never steal a baby for cash.

I'm not that bad!

Well your link suggests the policy was to be scrapped, almost 2 years ago. Ergo, that policy no longer exists and can not be applied to this current situation.

Ars logica.

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

Ars logica.

is that "clever arse"?

Yeah, something like that

that policy no longer exists and can not be applied to this current situation

It's the same situation, a different flavour of policy.

You have absolutely no connection to anything you claim to have.

At best you did the degree, maybe did a bit of work-experience & that's where your role ended.

Ok, but the evidence you supplied clearly shows the policy was scrapped after being in operation for only 3 years. That was 2 years ago.

Please supply evidence to support your statement that a new policy exists, which does the same thing as you claim.

Again (and again and again), I was a psychologist. I worked i both the public and private sectors, with a large range of clients, all of them highly dangerous or damaged.

I hope one day you'll remember accurately information clearly delivered to you.

Originally Posted by Don Juan

Quote: Originally Posted by StrontiumDog Notice the date...almost 2 years ago
They are chasing this couple now though. Nothing's changed.

yes, but maybe for a different reason

Social services have removed two young children from the care of their grandparents and arranged for them to be adopted by a homosexual couple

28 Jan 2009

Forty-six is considered 'too old' to keep the baby.

When he protested to social workers, the grandfather alleges he was told: "You can either accept it and there's a chance you'll see the children twice a year, or you can take that stance and never see them again"

Sinister.

Sounds to me like a new 'gay adoption' target is doing the rounds nowadays.

"The grandfather is a farmhand who has angina while his wife is receiving medication for diabetes."

I'd have concerns about long term care, wouldn't you? The children are only 4 and 5.

I think this piece says more about your prejudices than anything else.

It also doesn't support your previous points in the slightest.

Still waiting for the evidence to support your grand conspiracy against the original couple on the run....

Two young children are snatched from the bosom of their family.

Their grandparents are warned menacingly by the kidnap gang that if they try to resist or go to the police, they will never see their grandson and granddaughter again.

It emerges that the brother and sister are believed to have been stolen to order and handed over to a homosexual couple biologically incapable of having babies of their own.

The story leads every national newspaper and television news bulletin in the land.

There is 24-hour rolling coverage, with TV trucks parked outside the scene of the crime. Pictures of the missing boy and girl are plastered over every front page, every shop window, every tree and lamp-post, and across the internet.

Footage of tearful, distraught family members is replayed every 15 minutes, along with heart-rending home video of the five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister blowing out the candles on their birthday cakes, singing nursery rhymes and playing in the park.

Solemn-faced detectives appeal for witnesses.

A huge reward is offered for any information which leads to their safe return.

Messages of support flood in — everyone from the Prime Minister to little old ladies sending a £5 postal order for the fund set up to secure the children’s release.

Meanwhile, in Edinburgh, a five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister are snatched from their grandparents and given to a gay couple and there’s barely a peep outside the pages of the Daily Mail.

No police appeals, no Panorama special, no public outcry.

Why?

Because they’ve been taken by social workers, not paedophiles. So that’s all right, then.

The grandparents stepped in when their daughter, a 26-year-old recovering heroin addict, was unable to care for her children.

But social services refused to let them adopt because they were ‘too old’ and had ‘health issues’.

The 59-year-old grandfather has angina and his 46-year-old wife has diabetes.

So what?

Angina hasn’t stopped him holding down a job as a farm labourer.

And if the department of health is to be believed, half the country is suffering from diabetes.

Are they suggesting that anyone with either ailment should have their children taken into care?

It’s been difficult piecing together this story, because it has all been carried in secret to ‘protect’ the children.

The truth is that it’s been kept secret to protect the identities of the social workers involved and conceal the extent of their wickedness.

This has only come to light because the grandfather had the courage to speak out.

And now he’s been told that because he spoke to the Daily Mail, he may never see his grandchildren again.

That was the same threat used against him if he didn’t drop his opposition to them being adopted by homosexuals.

He was branded a bigot and a ‘homophobe’, simply because he believes children should be raised by a man and a woman.

And unless he recanted, his punishment was to be excommunicated from his grandchildren for life.

I deliberately use this religious analogy, because official Britain and the homosexual lobby rigidly enforces the gay ‘rights’ agenda with a righteous zeal not seen since the Spanish Inquisition.

For what it’s worth, I’ve always supported equality for gays in terms of housing, employment and civil partnerships. But when it comes to adoption, children should be placed with a man and a woman.

And in this case, there were plenty of heterosexual couples in Edinburgh willing to offer a loving, secure home.

The children’s own mother wanted them raised by a proper mum and dad, ideally her own parents.

Just because she’s a recovering addict, it doesn’t mean her views should be ignored in such callous fashion.

But the social workers were motivated by ideology and, almost certainly, by deliberate policy.

They will have a quota of gay adoptive parents to meet.

These unfortunate children gave them a golden opportunity to tick another box and flaunt their doctrinaire ‘diversity’ credentials. They may even have been rewarded with a nice little bonus in their wage packets.

Job done.

And to hell with the consequences and the human misery inflicted.

Were it not for the grandfather speaking to the Mail, they’d have got away with it.

Actually, they will still get away with it, which only serves to compound the scandal.

These simple grandparents are powerless against the sadistic, Stalinist might of the social services system and the family courts.

But there’s another aspect of this appalling human horror story which has not been explored.

That’s the role of the couple being given the children.

We don’t know anything about them — how old they are, how long they’ve been together, whether they’ve got any medical conditions.

What makes them better prospective parents than any other heterosexual couples on the list?

More to the point, what kind of selfish individuals would even consider accepting for adoption children who don’t want to be adopted and who would rather live with their own natural grandparents, who are perfectly willing and able to offer them a loving home?

They would have to be familiar with the background.

If they weren’t, they are now. If they had a shred of decency they would tell Edinburgh social services: thanks, but no thanks.

As for anonymity, does anyone really think that two gay men, living together in an Edinburgh suburb, who suddenly start playing Happy Families with a five-year-old boy and a four-year-old girl, are going to go unnoticed?

Coincidentally, this story emerged in the week in which details were revealed of the millions spent in the search for little Maddie McCann, who was abducted almost two years ago and is still missing.

On the face of it, the cases have nothing in common.

But stolen children are at the heart of both.

Does it matter whether your child or grandchild has been taken by a complete stranger or by social workers?

What’s worse: not knowing, or knowing — and being utterly unable to do anything to get them back, after being told that if you try, you will never, ever see them again?

In each case, the key question is the same: what kind of monsters could do something like this?

End of

Oh dear.

Ok, so you have some big fucking issues with social services.

I wonder what they did to you?

In my experience, people who usually go around with massive chips on their shoulders, spouting off irrelevant bullshit about social services, do so because they had something bad happen to them.

SS may make mistakes, as they are very overworked and hard pressed

but it is a bit like highlighting terrible motor accidents and saying that you should tear up all the roads, DJ, the way you are playing it

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

people who usually go around with massive chips on their shoulders, spouting off irrelevant bullshit

That describes you to perfection.

may make mistakes

These 'mistakes' seem to match up perfectly with their targets.

Originally Posted by Don Juan

These 'mistakes' seem to match up perfectly with their targets.

seem to?

Originally Posted by Don Juan

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

people who usually go around with massive chips on their shoulders, spouting off irrelevant bullshit

That describes you to perfection.

Oh dear, it appears DJ has lapsed into childish insult mode, next he'll be saying "no you are".


Oh, he did that already.

There was another story recently about a women who the ss deemed was too fat to look after a new baby having it taken into care. I would look it up but i'm too stupid, it's getting scary having kids in the UK, you aint even allowed to smack the little buggers.

I agree the UK has gone PC crazy. Far too much of this crap lately.